Page 18 of 19

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:54 pm
by Original Dub
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one :roll:


And there's the other one I was referring to.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:54 pm
by Slim
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Mase wrote:
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one :roll:


Hmmmm been missing for about 3 months of us getting fucked over then BAM! out of nowhere back when we get a favourable decision. Interesting.


Hes the fuckign pioneer of the ''No agenda here ,move on movement''...a sly cunt who stays under his rock when the bias is at fever pitch then slithers out like the slimy reptile he is when we get a decision for us.

Utter cunt.


So he obviously mentioned the fact Forshaw should have been sent off for that horrid tackle on Kev or that Fabio should have walked for shoving the ref. I mean, he wouldn't want to appear like HE has an agenda after all.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 12:04 am
by freshie

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 1:16 am
by edge275
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one :roll:


Well I consider you and a few others 'the deluded braindeads'.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 1:41 am
by Tokyo Blue
Mase wrote:
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:That Fenandinho elbow could easily of been a red. Obviously the conspiracy lunatics missed this one :roll:


Hmmmm been missing for about 3 months of us getting fucked over then BAM! out of nowhere back when we get a favourable decision. Interesting.

Doesn't mean he is wrong though. Fernandinho was lucky not to get sent off for that. They'll get him on Tuesday, I suspect, although how the ref can say he has not seen it (and he will, let's not piss about) is beyond belief when he was right next to it.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 3:49 am
by zuricity
was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 3:54 am
by dazby
Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 7:13 am
by johnny crossan
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 7:32 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
johnny crossan wrote:
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)


Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".

Daz, you have been reported for foul language.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 8:45 am
by carl_feedthegoat
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)


Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".

Daz, you have been reported for foul language.


Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.

You get 9 out of 10 from me.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 10:02 am
by City64
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)


Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".

Daz, you have been reported for foul language.


Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.

You get 9 out of 10 from me.

Your easily pleased Carl , maybe now Vinny is back to his best your attention span has wained ??? :lol:

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 10:08 am
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

He stuck his arm out as he was expecting the Boro player to come flying into him. It didn't happen but didn't look that bad despite the commentators' best efforts.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 10:55 am
by Sparklehorse
Beefymcfc wrote:MC, do you think Pep wants the Knuckler in midfield or does he want the Passer there? Personally, I'm with you, I'd want an enforcer in there but I'm not sure if PG would look at that.

Interesting that you mention the forwards, we went from 4 to 1 and I'm still not sure if we've still got 2 out and out strikers. Was this caused by us knowing what Pep wanted, and accorded early?

We need a knuckler who can pass ??

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 10:59 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)


Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".

Daz, you have been reported for foul language.


Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.

You get 9 out of 10 from me.


I knew you'd nod approvingly. Though you yourself have become soft as fuck grandfather figure. What the hell happened to capitals, calling every fucking cunt cunt and having multiple rows going on at the same time?

To be fair, I apologized to Beefy last night via PM as I might've been slightly out of order after couple of beers and absolutely terrible result.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 11:20 am
by carl_feedthegoat
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)


Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".

Daz, you have been reported for foul language.


Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.

You get 9 out of 10 from me.


I knew you'd nod approvingly. Though you yourself have become soft as fuck grandfather figure. What the hell happened to capitals, calling every fucking cunt cunt and having multiple rows going on at the same time?

To be fair, I apologized to Beefy last night via PM as I might've been slightly out of order after couple of beers and absolutely terrible result.


I wouldn't say soft as fuck , maybe more chilled as Im less stressed these days....probably living under a coconut tree these last few years has done that.

I will tell you one thing , if PeP doesnt finish at least 4th the fuckign site will explode.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 11:22 am
by carl_feedthegoat
City64 wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
dazby wrote:Bravo NQDP. What a performance!

He's singlehandedly bringing back the drama.

not a happy juxtaposition perhaps ;)


Over the years I've been insulted (and I have insulted people) with just about every way imaginable however that really is out of order. Why not contonue it with "well Lahm NQDP, Hughes to have you back".

Daz, you have been reported for foul language.


Must admit - it was a great comeback , much better than just bimbling back on the site......all guns blazing.

You get 9 out of 10 from me.

Your easily pleased Carl , maybe now Vinny is back to his best your attention span has wained ??? :lol:


Vinny back to his best ??? last week he fouled just out the area and they scored from it and yesterday the ball ricocheted off him like a fuckign pin ball machine and they scored from it...........back to his best you say????

I only want stones in that defence next season...plus 3 newbies.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 4:31 pm
by South Stand Balti
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 4:40 pm
by zuricity
South Stand Balti wrote:
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.


No wonder some get all hot under the collar on here!

I meant "The game" , where did i mention any foul by anyone?

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 4:47 pm
by South Stand Balti
zuricity wrote:
South Stand Balti wrote:
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.


No wonder some get all hot under the collar on here!

I meant "The game" , where did i mention any foul by anyone?

Doh! Sorry, I'd been discussing the Dhino hand off and assumed you meant that. The first half was poor but we were better in the second half after the subs and change in set up. We didn't have anyone running the game though in the absence of Yaya and Silva

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 5:27 pm
by zuricity
South Stand Balti wrote:
zuricity wrote:
South Stand Balti wrote:
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.


No wonder some get all hot under the collar on here!

I meant "The game" , where did i mention any foul by anyone?

Doh! Sorry, I'd been discussing the Dhino hand off and assumed you meant that. The first half was poor but we were better in the second half after the subs and change in set up. We didn't have anyone running the game though in the absence of Yaya and Silva


Thanks !

I was just amazed this morning to go to the Beeb website and not find a report on the game alongside other game reports ,but several about different rag topics . I mean , a basic match report isn't too much to ask of your national tv provider is it ?