PeterParker wrote:The hacker Pinto will have a press conference at 18 saying ”more to follow”.
I would avoid social media tonight, fellas, the red agenda will be in full motion again. No need to ruin your weekend.
Not sure he has anything
PeterParker wrote:The hacker Pinto will have a press conference at 18 saying ”more to follow”.
I would avoid social media tonight, fellas, the red agenda will be in full motion again. No need to ruin your weekend.
Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though

TrueBlue4610 wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
Well I for one am!
IF, and it is still a big if, SM has put his own money in, so what? And if it was the AD government, also so what? Since the dawn of football, clubs have been funded by benefactor owners, usually also local and a (rich) fan, supplementing the club's earnings to better the club. That's why clubs are important parts of their community.
That only changed with FFP, which we all know was only devised to keep the cartel clubs at the top table getting fatter with no one able to challenge them. FFP has nothing to do with "protecting clubs", or football integrity.
An unjust rule will always be unjust, until someone is brave enough to stand up and fight the rule-makers. Without that mindset we'd still be living under a feudal system!
That someone is Manchester City. And we all know good always prevails over evil...


TrueBlue4610 wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
Well I for one am!
IF, and it is still a big if, SM has put his own money in, so what? And if it was the AD government, also so what? Since the dawn of football, clubs have been funded by benefactor owners, usually also local and a (rich) fan, supplementing the club's earnings to better the club. That's why clubs are important parts of their community.
That only changed with FFP, which we all know was only devised to keep the cartel clubs at the top table getting fatter with no one able to challenge them. FFP has nothing to do with "protecting clubs", or football integrity.
An unjust rule will always be unjust, until someone is brave enough to stand up and fight the rule-makers. Without that mindset we'd still be living under a feudal system!
That someone is Manchester City. And we all know good always prevails over evil...
patrickblue wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.
TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.
Scatman wrote:patrickblue wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.
TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.
It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.

Scatman wrote:patrickblue wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.
TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.
It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusion that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.



carl_feedthegoat wrote:Scatman wrote:patrickblue wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.
TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.
It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.
Hence, their final decision was based on 'just their opinion' due to the emails and ignored factual wires from the Abu Dabi government.
Scatman wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Scatman wrote:patrickblue wrote:Wooders wrote:Not sure I’m too fond of this “loophole” use to justify no rule breaking though
It's not a loophole, it's allowable under the rules. If it was illegal Arse couldn't be sponsored by a state owned airline.
TBH, I can't imagine why the Sheik would pay City and not City's sponsors when one is legal and the other isn't. Makes no sense at all.
It must be the case that the money didn't come directly from the sheik (as you say that would be idiotic) but they have used the emails and whatever else as evidence to come to the conclusi that it came to city from him but through the sponsors.
Hence, their final decision was based on 'just their opinion' due to the emails and ignored factual wires from the Abu Dabi government.
Certainly looks that way.
But then the decision handed down by a jury in any trial is essentially just an opinion.
nottsblue wrote:https://www.skysports.com/football/news/13594421/man-city-owners-cannot-retain-status-if-guilty-verdict-stands-after-appeal-says-gary-neville
Hope we ban this cunt forever
Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’
Scatman wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’
UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row
salford city wrote:Scatman wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’
UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row
Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence

sheblue wrote:salford city wrote:Scatman wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’
UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row
Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence
There are no morals in a bitter dog fight.
I dont give a fuck what anyone thinks we should use all means possible to defend ourselves against the cartel league and their masses of media cronies.
We are facing a tsunami of bitter hate, lies, resentment and misinformation. Make no mistske they want to kill us.
Keep the gloves off.
I for one sincerely hope tge league burns. It is what has to happen
sheblue wrote:salford city wrote:Scatman wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Telegraph this is getting very messy!!’
UAE threatens Burnham over Man City: We’ll pull billions out of UK
Prime Minister under pressure as Gulf state warns it will withdraw investment in retaliation for Premier League row
Love this. Saw something yesterday saying we should not be able to exert political power over the outcome - ha, fuck that. Its okfor the media to push the agenda of the red cartel though I guess. You can see the exit strategy for the PL and it's supporters forming - loophole and political influence
There are no morals in a bitter dog fight.
I dont give a fuck what anyone thinks we should use all means possible to defend ourselves against the cartel league and their masses of media cronies.
We are facing a tsunami of bitter hate, lies, resentment and misinformation. Make no mistske they want to kill us.
Keep the gloves off.
I for one sincerely hope tge league burns. It is what has to happen
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mase, patrickblue, Swales4ever, TrueBlue4610 and 1445 guests