Page 19 of 88

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:47 pm
by john@staustell
Out of his depth on this one

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:56 pm
by Beefymcfc
john@staustell wrote:Out of his depth on this one

Didn't he used to be one of the Elite ref's then relegated for probably giving a foul to a team playing against the Sky 4.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:14 pm
by Original Dub
Sterling kicked when through. But as danny mills said

"If that was at a more crucial stage of the match, it would have been given"

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:24 pm
by mr_nool
Original Dub wrote:Sterling kicked when through. But as danny mills said

"If that was at a more crucial stage of the match, it would have been given"


Danny Murphy, not Mills. And he said that it should have been given and that Sterling probably would have been more upset if it were in a more crucial stage of the game.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:46 pm
by Original Dub
Apologies, I knew it was murphy obviously.

So...

Great performance by the team. Horrible, horrible performance by the ref and that's what this thread is for.

If it wasn't highlighted when we win, then it wouldn't be fair to highlight it when we lose.

It's important no matter what the outcome.

I think nacho was off?

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:52 pm
by iwasthere2012
Original Dub wrote:Apologies, I knew it was murphy obviously.

So...

Great performance by the team. Horrible, horrible performance by the ref and that's what this thread is for.

If it wasn't highlighted when we win, then it wouldn't be fair to highlight it when we lose.

It's important no matter what the outcome.

I think nacho was off?

Thought it came of the defenders toe before reaching him.
If not he was definitely off.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:11 pm
by Beefymcfc
I thought that after the shit decisions, the ref did alright. He'd obviously been given the brief to not allow us anything that could be classed as contentious (hanging on with nails) but realised he couldn't please his masters forever as it would compromise his so called 'Integrity'.

Reminded me of the Wolves game where the ref tried but realised it wasn't going to work, we were just that good. Oh, and Carlos needed to square his swing, he was a bit loose.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:56 pm
by carolina-blue
iwasthere2012 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:Apologies, I knew it was murphy obviously.

So...

Great performance by the team. Horrible, horrible performance by the ref and that's what this thread is for.

If it wasn't highlighted when we win, then it wouldn't be fair to highlight it when we lose.

It's important no matter what the outcome.

I think nacho was off?

Thought it came of the defenders toe before reaching him.
If not he was definitely off.


I thought it came off the defender as well
Nacho does have a knack of right place right time

And yes you are dead right we have to highlight the Bad even when we win . I liked the way Sane
Told the ref that was 3 on his way by lol

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:32 am
by mr_nool
carolina-blue wrote:
iwasthere2012 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:Apologies, I knew it was murphy obviously.

So...

Great performance by the team. Horrible, horrible performance by the ref and that's what this thread is for.

If it wasn't highlighted when we win, then it wouldn't be fair to highlight it when we lose.

It's important no matter what the outcome.

I think nacho was off?

Thought it came of the defenders toe before reaching him.
If not he was definitely off.


I thought it came off the defender as well
Nacho does have a knack of right place right time

And yes you are dead right we have to highlight the Bad even when we win . I liked the way Sane
Told the ref that was 3 on his way by lol


It doesn't matter if it came off the defender if he was offside when the pass was made. It's still offside.
For me it was borderline, but the general rule is to give the attacking player the benefit of the doubt.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:22 am
by Original Dub
I'm amazed Sane isn't all over ssn for the pointing out the 3 penalties to the ref.

Honestly very surprised.

Not surprised about the penalty decisions though. How could you be at this stage?

Same again on sunday. Watch this space

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:24 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Original Dub wrote:I'm amazed Sane isn't all over ssn for the pointing out the 3 penalties to the ref.

Honestly very surprised.

Not surprised about the penalty decisions though. How could you be at this stage?

Same again on sunday. Watch this space


That would only serve to highlight the fact that we were denied, again, not in their interests.

I was surprised Leroy wasn't carded for it though.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 10:36 am
by blue b4 the moon
Beefymcfc wrote:I thought that after the shit decisions, the ref did alright. He'd obviously been given the brief to not allow us anything that could be classed as contentious (hanging on with nails) but realised he couldn't please his masters forever as it would compromise his so called 'Integrity'.

Reminded me of the Wolves game where the ref tried but realised it wasn't going to work, we were just that good. Oh, and Carlos needed to square his swing, he was a bit loose.



Norwich game mate, Foy was indeed bent as fuck that game, his change of style when we were in control should have sen him sacked.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:10 pm
by Original Dub

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:39 pm
by john@staustell
Original Dub wrote:http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-news-sane-referee-12679507


United fans outraged. Great that they all watch us these days

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:50 pm
by carolina-blue
john@staustell wrote:
Original Dub wrote:http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-news-sane-referee-12679507


United fans outraged. Great that they all watch us these days


That is way to funny talk about wearing rose
Tinted Glasses . All the horrible shit Wiggy
Has got up to in refs faces Down the years hypocritical wankers

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:21 pm
by Beefymcfc
blue b4 the moon wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:I thought that after the shit decisions, the ref did alright. He'd obviously been given the brief to not allow us anything that could be classed as contentious (hanging on with nails) but realised he couldn't please his masters forever as it would compromise his so called 'Integrity'.

Reminded me of the Wolves game where the ref tried but realised it wasn't going to work, we were just that good. Oh, and Carlos needed to square his swing, he was a bit loose.



Norwich game mate, Foy was indeed bent as fuck that game, his change of style when we were in control should have sen him sacked.

Cheers mate, yellow, orange, it's all amber to me ;-)

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 8:52 pm
by Mikhail Chigorin
mr_nool wrote:
carolina-blue wrote:
iwasthere2012 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:Apologies, I knew it was murphy obviously.

So...

Great performance by the team. Horrible, horrible performance by the ref and that's what this thread is for.

If it wasn't highlighted when we win, then it wouldn't be fair to highlight it when we lose.

It's important no matter what the outcome.

I think nacho was off?

Thought it came of the defenders toe before reaching him.
If not he was definitely off.


I thought it came off the defender as well
Nacho does have a knack of right place right time

And yes you are dead right we have to highlight the Bad even when we win . I liked the way Sane
Told the ref that was 3 on his way by lol


It doesn't matter if it came off the defender if he was offside when the pass was made. It's still offside.
For me it was borderline, but the general rule is to give the attacking player the benefit of the doubt.


Is this an example of the revolutionary "on the edge of offside" rule in action ??

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 8:56 pm
by City64
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
mr_nool wrote:
carolina-blue wrote:
iwasthere2012 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:Apologies, I knew it was murphy obviously.

So...

Great performance by the team. Horrible, horrible performance by the ref and that's what this thread is for.

If it wasn't highlighted when we win, then it wouldn't be fair to highlight it when we lose.

It's important no matter what the outcome.

I think nacho was off?

Thought it came of the defenders toe before reaching him.
If not he was definitely off.


I thought it came off the defender as well
Nacho does have a knack of right place right time

And yes you are dead right we have to highlight the Bad even when we win . I liked the way Sane
Told the ref that was 3 on his way by lol


It doesn't matter if it came off the defender if he was offside when the pass was made. It's still offside.
For me it was borderline, but the general rule is to give the attacking player the benefit of the doubt.


Is this an example of the revolutionary "on the edge of offside" rule in action ??

Fact is if he was wearing a red shirt he would have been miles onside .

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:04 pm
by Mikhail Chigorin
^^ Without question 64.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:24 pm
by johnny crossan
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:^^ Without question 64.

I exploded with geriatric rage on several occasions before our second goal. Very unhealthy.