Page 19 of 19

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 6:38 pm
by South Stand Balti
zuricity wrote:
South Stand Balti wrote:
zuricity wrote:
South Stand Balti wrote:
zuricity wrote:was it that bad? not one mention of the game on the BBC site, yet several for the rags on the same page.

No it wasn't bad mate. He wasn't looking at the Boro player. He just crouched slightly and put his arm out as he was shielding the ball. No intent. Sane dove for the penalty though but I'm genuinely glad as its about time we got something off an official.


No wonder some get all hot under the collar on here!

I meant "The game" , where did i mention any foul by anyone?

Doh! Sorry, I'd been discussing the Dhino hand off and assumed you meant that. The first half was poor but we were better in the second half after the subs and change in set up. We didn't have anyone running the game though in the absence of Yaya and Silva


Thanks !

I was just amazed this morning to go to the Beeb website and not find a report on the game alongside other game reports ,but several about different rag topics . I mean , a basic match report isn't too much to ask of your national tv provider is it ?

No it's not. I'm pretty sure they would have had one if we'd lost!

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2017 6:52 pm
by zuricity
^^^

Or had a player sent off !

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 6:47 pm
by nottsblue
Middlesboro charged with failing to keep their players in control after the award of our penalty. Bit of justice

Re: ***boro vs City official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2017 8:42 pm
by Dameerto
nottsblue wrote:Middlesboro charged with failing to keep their players in control after the award of our penalty. Bit of justice

I should think so - I was ready to brick the FA's windows if they didn't act.