Page 19 of 19

Re: ***Official Match Thread|Shakhtar Donetsk v City***

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:19 am
by mr_nool
zuricity wrote:The way i see it with "Missed chances" is that the figures themselves don't really explain it, perhaps a further breakdown is necessary ?

One on ones with the goalie we really should convert.

Shots from outside the box, nearby the post or corner flag miss ?

under pressure to shoot or a free run like fern last weekend.

Ball on the floor or bouncing awkwardly when shooting ?


Clear header on goal or obstructed jumping for the ball and get a shoulder to it ? (Laportes was a Shampoo (head and shoulders ) on Tuesday)

So many factors. At least we are making lots of attempts and for most of the game are around the oppositions penalty box and not ours.

It's bound to create some chances - and make defending easier too.


That's what they're trying to do with the xG (expected goal) stats that have been a rage the last year. This tool has drawbacks as well, but does give a more nuanced picture.

Re: ***Official Match Thread|Shakhtar Donetsk v City***

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 9:34 am
by iwasthere2012
mr_nool wrote:
zuricity wrote:The way i see it with "Missed chances" is that the figures themselves don't really explain it, perhaps a further breakdown is necessary ?

One on ones with the goalie we really should convert.

Shots from outside the box, nearby the post or corner flag miss ?

under pressure to shoot or a free run like fern last weekend.

Ball on the floor or bouncing awkwardly when shooting ?


Clear header on goal or obstructed jumping for the ball and get a shoulder to it ? (Laportes was a Shampoo (head and shoulders ) on Tuesday)

So many factors. At least we are making lots of attempts and for most of the game are around the oppositions penalty box and not ours.

It's bound to create some chances - and make defending easier too.


That's what they're trying to do with the xG (expected goal) stats that have been a rage the last year. This tool has drawbacks as well, but does give a more nuanced picture.


Let's not resort to name calling.

Re: ***Official Match Thread|Shakhtar Donetsk v City***

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:18 pm
by john@staustell
iwasthere2012 wrote:
mr_nool wrote:
zuricity wrote:The way i see it with "Missed chances" is that the figures themselves don't really explain it, perhaps a further breakdown is necessary ?

One on ones with the goalie we really should convert.

Shots from outside the box, nearby the post or corner flag miss ?

under pressure to shoot or a free run like fern last weekend.

Ball on the floor or bouncing awkwardly when shooting ?


Clear header on goal or obstructed jumping for the ball and get a shoulder to it ? (Laportes was a Shampoo (head and shoulders ) on Tuesday)

So many factors. At least we are making lots of attempts and for most of the game are around the oppositions penalty box and not ours.

It's bound to create some chances - and make defending easier too.


That's what they're trying to do with the xG (expected goal) stats that have been a rage the last year. This tool has drawbacks as well, but does give a more nuanced picture.


Let's not resort to name calling.


Isn't there another thread on Merson?