Goaters 103 wrote:As an asie, how bloody huge were those two Leicester centre halves last night/ Jesus, they looked like cavemen.
Set pieces may be where their threat comes from in the return leg.
If we get past this, then the impression I got from from the recent game I saw; Spurs are basically the same thing, but possibly a bit more pressing & quicker on the break. Perhaps more like Leicester played 2nd half than first; occasionally going forward before re forming the 9. Spurs were at home though!
They looked enormous v Chelsea & coached to fuck. All lined up in walls. I expect them to win v Chelsea but y never know I suppose.
It's a waste of fucking time imo, playing like that. It gets the coach a badge of honour, if he wins a cup, that's all. It's supposed to be about producing players; footballers. It's not supposed to be about avoiding defeat & hoping to nick a competition. There is a fair bit of it in the Premier League.
Sure, you want to win stuff, but imagine Wilcox/Vieira lined City up like that ? What do the players learn ? How to stand in two lines & move across ? So if one of them one day manages to play for Tony Pulis, they will be well drilled ? What would our team line up be ? Half the creative players dropped ? More big lads coming through ? Exactly that. And then we question why there are few quality English footballers, & loads of runners. Well duh!
What City are doing at this level is fantastic, win lose or draw. And it's not freedom without responsibility for these creative players, it's the opposite. They have to work their bollocks off to play this way & most of the creative players have to do it moreso than they would in a jogging, boring, 4-6 formation.
Our first team often can't/won't do it, but PSG did it with ten men last night. Mourinho is more of a jogging, boring, coach & his tactics & his team, got their arses kicked by a side playing football & working hard. That's how City will play in the future, but probably better.