Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Im From Manchester wrote:F*ck me ! With friends like these who needs enemies.
Alan Hanson is a c*ck of the highest order who likes to pretend he is the fount of all knowledge whilst never actually being prepared to put his money where his mouth is and go into management.
Never have I seen such a character assassination of one player. F*ck me every time a team concede a goal you can make some case for someonebeing at fault somewhere.
From what I could see for the second goal Bridge was caught out of position because Barry lost the ball when it looked like we were on a break away.
9 times out of 10 the mistake for the third wouldn't have led to a goal and therefore wouldn't be highlighted.
Yes, Bridge had a bad game, it happens, but the hysteria and OTT reactions to our so called 'crap' defence are frankly laughable. There are only 3 teams with a better goals against column than us in the Premier League !! If that's crap then heaven help the rest of the premier league teams!
Its about time some of our fans actually started to stick up for the club against the snipers and I'm pleased that Hughes has done just that.
Im From Manchester wrote:F*ck me ! With friends like these who needs enemies.
Alan Hanson is a c*ck of the highest order who likes to pretend he is the fount of all knowledge whilst never actually being prepared to put his money where his mouth is and go into management.
Never have I seen such a character assassination of one player. F*ck me every time a team concede a goal you can make some case for someonebeing at fault somewhere.
From what I could see for the second goal Bridge was caught out of position because Barry lost the ball when it looked like we were on a break away.
9 times out of 10 the mistake for the third wouldn't have led to a goal and therefore wouldn't be highlighted.
Yes, Bridge had a bad game, it happens, but the hysteria and OTT reactions to our so called 'crap' defence are frankly laughable. There are only 3 teams with a better goals against column than us in the Premier League !! If that's crap then heaven help the rest of the premier league teams!
Its about time some of our fans actually started to stick up for the club against the snipers and I'm pleased that Hughes has done just that.
Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
10.Goater_Legend wrote:I think Hughes is just taking the spotlight of the team who have been getting a bashing for the shite defending from the media (& rightly so). Ferguson has been at it for years after the Rags have played shite, well played Hughes.
CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:I think he is a first class dickhead.
What exactly was his problem ?, his problem was that he cant handle the truth, I think this City job has gone to his head, refusing to speak to the media criticizing respected TV pundits.
He reminds me of baconface.
Original Dub wrote:CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:I think he is a first class dickhead.
What exactly was his problem ?, his problem was that he cant handle the truth, I think this City job has gone to his head, refusing to speak to the media criticizing respected TV pundits.
He reminds me of baconface.
Anti hughes post?
No way?!
Mate, add something else and people might appreciate you more - we all ready have a member who does what you're trying to do.
Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
unfortunatly if hughes had kept stum on this one no one would have remembered anything about it - i didnt notice any big threads about match of the day...
But now its headline news again - putting it back in the limelight which has completly the oposite affect of removing player pressure.
I do think that our defense isnt 100% down to the players not being good enough but it does look like the balance of the back 4 is all to cock! Perhaps Toure and Lescott will never form a good partnership because theyre too similar?
Original Dub wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Anti-Hughes post?
No way?!!
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Original Dub wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Anti-Hughes post?
No way?!!
What a waste of thread space your comments on this forum are....
NOT ANTI-HUGHES post at all, but with you being the main blueprint for building an idiot, I thought I would explain that it is a ANTI-SHIT DEFENDING post instead.
Try listening to your hero on Sky occasionally when your not tossing off over pictures of him in his suit waving his arms around, and you will hear him say that he won't be bringing any big name signings or spending much in January, put 2 and 2 together and get 4 for once you pillock, the owner is loaded, yet no money available can only mean one thing.....they don't trust him to spend it wisely enough after seeing what £200m has bought them (a side who panic when under the cosh and scrape draws against the top class opposition of Burnley, Fulham, Wigan and Birmingham).
And for someone to liken Hughes to Mourinho, well even you must see that is a little stupid a comparison to make, it's like comparing Harrods to Poundland, the only comparrison that Hughes has with Mourinho, is they both wear suits and stand on the side of a pitch come matchday......from there on one of them is lost without a clue, the other is Mourinho.
Wonderwall wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Original Dub wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Anti-Hughes post?
No way?!!
What a waste of thread space your comments on this forum are....
NOT ANTI-HUGHES post at all, but with you being the main blueprint for building an idiot, I thought I would explain that it is a ANTI-SHIT DEFENDING post instead.
Try listening to your hero on Sky occasionally when your not tossing off over pictures of him in his suit waving his arms around, and you will hear him say that he won't be bringing any big name signings or spending much in January, put 2 and 2 together and get 4 for once you pillock, the owner is loaded, yet no money available can only mean one thing.....they don't trust him to spend it wisely enough after seeing what £200m has bought them (a side who panic when under the cosh and scrape draws against the top class opposition of Burnley, Fulham, Wigan and Birmingham).
And for someone to liken Hughes to Mourinho, well even you must see that is a little stupid a comparison to make, it's like comparing Harrods to Poundland, the only comparrison that Hughes has with Mourinho, is they both wear suits and stand on the side of a pitch come matchday......from there on one of them is lost without a clue, the other is Mourinho.
rig have you ever posted anything positive? EVER?
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Original Dub wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Anti-Hughes post?
No way?!!
What a waste of thread space your comments on this forum are....
NOT ANTI-HUGHES post at all, but with you being the main blueprint for building an idiot, I thought I would explain that it is a ANTI-SHIT DEFENDING post instead.
Try listening to your hero on Sky occasionally when your not tossing off over pictures of him in his suit waving his arms around, and you will hear him say that he won't be bringing any big name signings or spending much in January, put 2 and 2 together and get 4 for once you pillock, the owner is loaded, yet no money available can only mean one thing.....they don't trust him to spend it wisely enough after seeing what £200m has bought them (a side who panic when under the cosh and scrape draws against the top class opposition of Burnley, Fulham, Wigan and Birmingham).
And for someone to liken Hughes to Mourinho, well even you must see that is a little stupid a comparison to make, it's like comparing Harrods to Poundland, the only comparrison that Hughes has with Mourinho, is they both wear suits and stand on the side of a pitch come matchday......from there on one of them is lost without a clue, the other is Mourinho.
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Original Dub wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Anti-Hughes post?
No way?!!
What a waste of thread space your comments on this forum are....
NOT ANTI-HUGHES post at all, but with you being the main blueprint for building an idiot, I thought I would explain that it is a ANTI-SHIT DEFENDING post instead.
Try listening to your hero on Sky occasionally when your not tossing off over pictures of him in his suit waving his arms around, and you will hear him say that he won't be bringing any big name signings or spending much in January, put 2 and 2 together and get 4 for once you pillock, the owner is loaded, yet no money available can only mean one thing.....they don't trust him to spend it wisely enough after seeing what £200m has bought them (a side who panic when under the cosh and scrape draws against the top class opposition of Burnley, Fulham, Wigan and Birmingham).
And for someone to liken Hughes to Mourinho, well even you must see that is a little stupid a comparison to make, it's like comparing Harrods to Poundland, the only comparrison that Hughes has with Mourinho, is they both wear suits and stand on the side of a pitch come matchday......from there on one of them is lost without a clue, the other is Mourinho.
Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Original Dub wrote:Robinho_Is_GOD wrote:Dameerto wrote:Twobob wrote:Bridge was shit? - Correct
Lescott was shit? - Correct
Is the defense too soft and leaks easy goals? - Correct
Hughes, Instead of barrating people who will pounce on any mistakes our team makes (which is allways going to happen) concentrate on sorting out the crap of a defence we have (or havent got)...
Or maybe he's doing a Mourinho and trying to focus the media on him rather than his players? If my team was playing shite and there were a few signs of players being singled out on TV that's what I'd do.
I wish he would and win something but we all know even Hughes supporters thats not going to happen, all m.o.t.d. did was emphasize what Hughes could not see.
When you have WON something you have the right to defend your players Hughes instead should be trying to put his defence right Hughes said what he said because he can not see past his nose,some managers get the best out of mediocrity Hughes his capable of getting mediocrity out of good players, he just said on tv no big name players coming in January looking between the lines he may have been told they don't trust him with money.
Anti-Hughes post?
No way?!!
What a waste of thread space your comments on this forum are....
NOT ANTI-HUGHES post at all, but with you being the main blueprint for building an idiot, I thought I would explain that it is a ANTI-SHIT DEFENDING post instead.
Try listening to your hero on Sky occasionally when your not tossing off over pictures of him in his suit waving his arms around, and you will hear him say that he won't be bringing any big name signings or spending much in January, put 2 and 2 together and get 4 for once you pillock, the owner is loaded, yet no money available can only mean one thing.....they don't trust him to spend it wisely enough after seeing what £200m has bought them (a side who panic when under the cosh and scrape draws against the top class opposition of Burnley, Fulham, Wigan and Birmingham).
And for someone to liken Hughes to Mourinho, well even you must see that is a little stupid a comparison to make, it's like comparing Harrods to Poundland, the only comparrison that Hughes has with Mourinho, is they both wear suits and stand on the side of a pitch come matchday......from there on one of them is lost without a clue, the other is Mourinho.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, Bluemoon4610, city72 and 100 guests