Slim wrote:Mr Miyagi wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Mr Miyagi wrote:Forgot to address the OP....
Personally, I find the idea of a "Hughes-only thread" a bad idea. Not sure that things are that clear cut. There are lots of issues to discuss that would touch on the idea of whether the manager is doing the right thing. And it is legitimate to ask if the manager is the right person for the job to do various things. For example: our defence currently has problems leaking goals. If I pose the question of whether Hughes (an ex-striker) knows enough about defensive coaching does that mean I have breached the rules and should have used the "Hughes-only" thread..... just some thoughts.... although I understand why the posters have driven you to consider it....
This place has got really bad during you exile and something needed to be done for the sanity of this place. I totally agree and it will be very difficult, which is why I am asking for common sense and if you all help with this, it will succeed. Several topics will touch on certain hughes traits, but dont get drawn into a hughes debate, that is why the thread is there.
It got worse than members trying to arrange a pre-game punch up in a car park? That's the lowest point I remember. I didn't realise things carried on being so bad..... well, desperate times as they say
Pretty sure we had one member threaten to stab another member as well. I can see how the Hughes out posts would be as bad, when he got appointed I felt like I had been stabbed.
The problem isn't the Hughes Out threads, its the 20-30 people who just slag off the poster for it. Either...
a) Ignore the thread
b) Address the post
I recommend a).
Colin the King wrote:My problem with the Hughes debate is that it's become very rigid. It's like there are two factions, both of whom are blind to the possibility of the other side being right. We've had so many discussions turn into stupid arguments and it takes away completely from what was, or might have been, an otherwise good debate. I've seen threads over the last few months where there might be four or five very good posts and a decent debate building up, only for someone to come on and moan and bitch about the poster/topic. Keep that shit to PM.
Saying that the site still has plenty going for it and even in the worst of times since I joined, there's always been that core group of regulars adding good points, whichever side of the fence you sit on. When I think of my favourite posters, there's 100% behind Hughes ones, 100% against Hughes ones and a few stuck in the middle. If all sides could agree to talk football in the main forum, it'd be the best forum in the land again. If and when that happens I'm sure the guys who've left would get involved again.
ruralblue wrote:I dont envy what you do WW at all mate, it must take a lot of time and effort, keep it up fella. Miss King Kev and Dans posts though hope they will come back. I would imagine all sites get this way once in a while.
rural
dick dastardley wrote:i dont post that much on here now, basically the forums gone down the shitter the past few months
Colin the King wrote:My problem with the Hughes debate is that it's become very rigid. It's like there are two factions, both of whom are blind to the possibility of the other side being right. We've had so many discussions turn into stupid arguments and it takes away completely from what was, or might have been, an otherwise good debate. I've seen threads over the last few months where there might be four or five very good posts and a decent debate building up, only for someone to come on and moan and bitch about the poster/topic. Keep that shit to PM.
Saying that the site still has plenty going for it and even in the worst of times since I joined, there's always been that core group of regulars adding good points, whichever side of the fence you sit on. When I think of my favourite posters, there's 100% behind Hughes ones, 100% against Hughes ones and a few stuck in the middle. If all sides could agree to talk football in the main forum, it'd be the best forum in the land again. If and when that happens I'm sure the guys who've left would get involved again.
sandman wrote:I dont even think winning the champs league would win over some now?
CityGer wrote:See here for context :
----------------
viewtopic.php?f=119&t=28213
----------------
Eh?? Why aim your comments at 'the site' rather than fidel??
I don't agree with him but if I felt strongly enough about it to challenge him then I would challenge him. I would not aim a dig at the site as a whole. Debate each point with the individual who has made it, ffs.
This is the main issue with the site at the moment imo. Those who are negative (or honest) about our current situation are being blamed with all that's wrong on the board. In actual fact, those who want everything to appear rosey are more to blame imo. The above being a prime example. Any Negative comments seem to be challenged as such........ "Site's shit" "Gone down hill" "Shit on here these days" "Rag" "You're ruining the place".
There are faults on both sides but this is a prime example of someone doing what seems to have become cool on here of late - Blaming all the board's faults on those who don't think that all is hunky dory with our team/club at the moment.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:sandman wrote:I dont even think winning the champs league would win over some now?
dazby wrote:Great idea with the Hughes thread. I've not read a word of it and the rest of the board has been great. Top stuff WW.
shawzy wrote:The sites gone way up in my estimation.
No personal insults and respecting peoples opinions even if you dont agree has been the norm this past week.
Well done to all.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 303 guests