The mancityfans.net football forum

johnpb78 wrote:Well, seeing as it has been requested in other threads, here it is. Lets stop skirting around it, it is fucking shit

I am generally mild mannered about our football, but this is withouot doubt, the worst football I have ever had the misfortune to see.

I was ambivalent, but who knows, this cunt may be for real

Mark Garrett wrote:Really is ridiculous, what do some fans on here want? A successful side? Or style of play with some inconsistent results?

King Kev wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:Well, seeing as it has been requested in other threads, here it is. Lets stop skirting around it, it is fucking shit

I am generally mild mannered about our football, but this is withouot doubt, the worst football I have ever had the misfortune to see.

I was ambivalent, but who knows, this cunt may be for real

You weren't following City during the Stuart Pearce era then?

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:This thread was started with a smile because in another thread somebody asked if it was the first Mancini out thread. Maybe it's a fair debate but it aint going to happen end of story. Mancini is the man even though he clearly has a lot of work to do based on the last 6 or so games as there is no escaping that we have been poor.

He will know only too well that performances haven't been good enough and that the next bunch of games are critical. We really don't want to go out of the FA cup and we really musn't lose the next 2 league games or the natives will be more than restless. We can if we want make all kinds of excuses but that's all they would be , excuses and meaningless. He has to be brave with team selections and style of play if we are to win the games that matter. He has the ability and the players have the ability , but have the fans got the ability during difficult times to support the team unreservedly?

Stoke at home is a really tough challenge but we have a great chance to win there even if we have to grind out a dirty scruffy 1 nil win. That's what I would call a top result not playing well. They don't have Ethers and we will have 2 or 3 back so will be stronger.So it's 1 nil for me and smiling again.:):)

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
No point saying that, he IS apparently Italian Stuart Pearce. Fair few posters have already made a case for that.

ant london wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
No point saying that, he IS apparently Italian Stuart Pearce. Fair few posters have already made a case for that.

fuck off Antti....he's no Stuart Pearce

clueless you are

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

King Kev wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:Well, seeing as it has been requested in other threads, here it is. Lets stop skirting around it, it is fucking shit

I am generally mild mannered about our football, but this is withouot doubt, the worst football I have ever had the misfortune to see.

I was ambivalent, but who knows, this cunt may be for real

You weren't following City during the Stuart Pearce era then?

No point saying that, he IS apparently Italian Stuart Pearce. Fair few posters have already made a case for that.

Ted Hughes wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

King Kev wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:Well, seeing as it has been requested in other threads, here it is. Lets stop skirting around it, it is fucking shit

I am generally mild mannered about our football, but this is withouot doubt, the worst football I have ever had the misfortune to see.

I was ambivalent, but who knows, this cunt may be for real

You weren't following City during the Stuart Pearce era then?

No point saying that, he IS apparently Italian Stuart Pearce. Fair few posters have already made a case for that.

Are you sure Pearce would be so much less entertaining if he had these players? I'm not. When he had SWP in his team we played much better than this. The fact that Mancini has managed to be so mind numbingly awful with so many attacking players available & yet is obviously a talented young manager has made me wonder whether Pearce was unlucky to be sacked.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

King Kev wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:Well, seeing as it has been requested in other threads, here it is. Lets stop skirting around it, it is fucking shit

I am generally mild mannered about our football, but this is withouot doubt, the worst football I have ever had the misfortune to see.

I was ambivalent, but who knows, this cunt may be for real

You weren't following City during the Stuart Pearce era then?

No point saying that, he IS apparently Italian Stuart Pearce. Fair few posters have already made a case for that.

Are you sure Pearce would be so much less entertaining if he had these players? I'm not. When he had SWP in his team we played much better than this. The fact that Mancini has managed to be so mind numbingly awful with so many attacking players available & yet is obviously a talented young manager has made me wonder whether Pearce was unlucky to be sacked.

Oh come ON. No need to go overboard.

You know what, I've never felt more stupid here in this site than after about two years of sticking up to him finally realising he was tactically complete clown. No Hughes argument or Mancini turning out to be shit or anything would be nothing at all compared to that. I SO desperately wanted Pearce to be the man for us as I love him as a character and prsonality that I just closed my eyes from all his weaknesses. I furiously defended him on numerous of occasions and in the end realised what a clown I had been.

ant london wrote:Pearce was terrible, the football was staggeringly bad. It's not too clever under Roberto at the moment, but honestly, under Stuart Pearce it was not safe to leave me with rasor blades, warm gin or paracetamol

And so naive (always refusing to criticise players, refs, other managers being cunts). Too nice by half.

I love Psycho as a bloke and hope that he does one day really make it as a manager but we were staggeringly bad (to watch) under him

Ted Hughes wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

King Kev wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:Well, seeing as it has been requested in other threads, here it is. Lets stop skirting around it, it is fucking shit

I am generally mild mannered about our football, but this is withouot doubt, the worst football I have ever had the misfortune to see.

I was ambivalent, but who knows, this cunt may be for real

You weren't following City during the Stuart Pearce era then?

No point saying that, he IS apparently Italian Stuart Pearce. Fair few posters have already made a case for that.

Are you sure Pearce would be so much less entertaining if he had these players? I'm not. When he had SWP in his team we played much better than this. The fact that Mancini has managed to be so mind numbingly awful with so many attacking players available & yet is obviously a talented young manager has made me wonder whether Pearce was unlucky to be sacked.

Ted Hughes wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:This thread was started with a smile because in another thread somebody asked if it was the first Mancini out thread. Maybe it's a fair debate but it aint going to happen end of story. Mancini is the man even though he clearly has a lot of work to do based on the last 6 or so games as there is no escaping that we have been poor.

He will know only too well that performances haven't been good enough and that the next bunch of games are critical. We really don't want to go out of the FA cup and we really musn't lose the next 2 league games or the natives will be more than restless. We can if we want make all kinds of excuses but that's all they would be , excuses and meaningless. He has to be brave with team selections and style of play if we are to win the games that matter. He has the ability and the players have the ability , but have the fans got the ability during difficult times to support the team unreservedly?

Stoke at home is a really tough challenge but we have a great chance to win there even if we have to grind out a dirty scruffy 1 nil win. That's what I would call a top result not playing well. They don't have Ethers and we will have 2 or 3 back so will be stronger.So it's 1 nil for me and smiling again.:):)

That would do me too. Those are the kind of games where the soul destroying crap we've been playing is justified rather than Portsmouth at home which should be 5 forwards & 5 goals. I don't care if we have a team full of defenders at Stoke so long as he's got a good plan for winning & they don't fall apart at the 1st long throw.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:You know what, I was watching some old season videos last summer and went through the trouble of watching of watching 06/07 season video bluntly named "Blues Review". I don't think I had watched it once since getting it that summer and watching it once. Anyone who claims that Mancini is ANYTHING like Pearce should watch it just for reference. Even after all that time I had to be put on suicide watch for next week or so.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

ant london wrote:Pearce was terrible, the football was staggeringly bad. It's not too clever under Roberto at the moment, but honestly, under Stuart Pearce it was not safe to leave me with rasor blades, warm gin or paracetamol

And so naive (always refusing to criticise players, refs, other managers being cunts). Too nice by half.

I love Psycho as a bloke and hope that he does one day really make it as a manager but we were staggeringly bad (to watch) under him

Absolutely.

You know what, I was watching some old season videos last summer and went through the trouble of watching of watching 06/07 season video bluntly named "Blues Review". I don't think I had watched it once since getting it that summer and watching it once. Anyone who claims that Mancini is ANYTHING like Pearce should watch it just for reference. Even after all that time I had to be put on suicide watch for next week or so.

johnpb78 wrote:nobody has called me a cunt yet for starting the thread. speaks volumes about our manager.

I really dont want or expect him to be sacked, it was more a tongue in cheek thread, but some interesting response