Rag_hater wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Rag_hater wrote:
Alright Stalinist then.
Dont you not understand if somone is prepared to undertake whatever consequences may arise through the non-fulfilment of a contract then it does not matter what people say.And whatever draconian measures people dream up whether it be a ten game ban or even kiddnapping a players family fuckall will make a man back down if you rile him.Now Javier whether right or wrong has made his mind up.
Stalinist, eh?
And rest of that crap makes no fucking sense to me. He is FREE to walk out of his contract and never to play professional football again. Absolutely free. No one can or will stop him if that's what he wants to do. But that's not the case here is it? He wants sunnier climate and probably even more wages and THAT is why he isn't honouring his contract. Out of pure greed.
And as someone already said to you, contract is LEGALLY binding document. Similar to any other contract you make in your life. Surely if you own your house, you wouldn't be best pleased if the person who sold you the house came one day and threw your family out and still kept the money? But he can't do that because you have a contract. Even if "he makes his mind about it".
But yeah, I think you are just winding people up for the sake of it.
Get real.
avoidconfusion wrote:It is funny how at some point during ANY kind of discussion on WHATEVER topic on the Internet... someone will ALWAYS draw a comparison to Hitler....
Rag_hater wrote:avoidconfusion wrote:It is funny how at some point during ANY kind of discussion on WHATEVER topic on the Internet... someone will ALWAYS draw a comparison to Hitler....
I think its cos some on here have said that a dictator type wouldn't be bad for us.
They are all up in arms though when someone does something they dont like.Hypocrites.
Rag_hater wrote:avoidconfusion wrote:It is funny how at some point during ANY kind of discussion on WHATEVER topic on the Internet... someone will ALWAYS draw a comparison to Hitler....
I think its cos some on here have said that a dictator type wouldn't be bad for us.
They are all up in arms though when someone does something they dont like.Hypocrites.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Rag_hater wrote:avoidconfusion wrote:It is funny how at some point during ANY kind of discussion on WHATEVER topic on the Internet... someone will ALWAYS draw a comparison to Hitler....
I think its cos some on here have said that a dictator type wouldn't be bad for us.
They are all up in arms though when someone does something they dont like.Hypocrites.
So people, me included, think that in football club at operational level strong leadership is needed. And when a player is being out of order and needs a telling to, you think these people are "hypocrites". Do you even know what the word means?
Rag_hater wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Rag_hater wrote:avoidconfusion wrote:It is funny how at some point during ANY kind of discussion on WHATEVER topic on the Internet... someone will ALWAYS draw a comparison to Hitler....
I think its cos some on here have said that a dictator type wouldn't be bad for us.
They are all up in arms though when someone does something they dont like.Hypocrites.
So people, me included, think that in football club at operational level strong leadership is needed. And when a player is being out of order and needs a telling to, you think these people are "hypocrites". Do you even know what the word means?
So when the leader of a club has to show strong leadership by being dictatorial he is doing something in your opinion that is beneficial,but when a player show the same strength of mind for you that is a cause to get your knickers in a twist.Thats hypocrsy to me.
Your attitude to St.Cregg ,first you called him a woman beater and few other things, then lauding him and now coming full circle and your back to calling him.That has been hypocritical.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Rag_hater wrote:avoidconfusion wrote:It is funny how at some point during ANY kind of discussion on WHATEVER topic on the Internet... someone will ALWAYS draw a comparison to Hitler....
I think its cos some on here have said that a dictator type wouldn't be bad for us.
They are all up in arms though when someone does something they dont like.Hypocrites.
So people, me included, think that in football club at operational level strong leadership is needed. And when a player is being out of order and needs a telling to, you think these people are "hypocrites". Do you even know what the word means?
So when the leader of a club has to show strong leadership by being dictatorial he is doing something in your opinion that is beneficial,but when a player show the same strength of mind for you that is a cause to get your knickers in a twist.Thats hypocrsy to me.
Your attitude to St.Cregg ,first you called him a woman beater and few other things, then lauding him and now coming full circle and your back to calling him.That has been hypocritical.
manager = paid to give players orders
player = paid to follow managers orders
is that concept of hierarchy and decision making completely alien to you?
Rag_hater wrote:Does the concept of go swivel not mean anything to you.
Cos if the grass seemed greener to me elsewhere or my boss had pissed me of regardless of what I had signed I would do one.
mr_nool wrote:Steve wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:http://www.teamtalk.com/news/2483/6338285/-Depressed-Masch-done-with-Reds-Messi
That got my fucking head boiling again. Not that I give two shits about Scousepool or Macherano but how fucking far away these modern players are from real life.
I mean, you sign a fucking multimega billion pound contract that will set you up for life. In exchange you may have to do certain things for limited period in your life like move to new country and learn a new language. And for your average 26 year old those would be very exiting things. But not for these fucking fannies. Many people would give their arm and leg to get to taste life like that. But these jokers have been brought up to "footballers lifestyle" and have no idea whatsoever how priviledged they are.
On top of that it has become a trend now that player "goes on strike" to force a move. That is absolutely fucking disgusting. Fair enough, you want to move elsewhere or better club but you should at least show some professionality and respect towards people who pay your wages, supporters, by doing your job as you always do.
The one thing I don't like is, when that player goes on strike, and behaves like a cunt, refusing to do his 'job'. The buying club still want to sign him (and invariably do), despite now being aware of his ill discipline. This player may well behave in the same way for them in the future. I don't think in the real world people could behave like that at their jobs, and still get a move to a better job elsewhere.
Yet you see people shacking up with people who are cheating on their husbands/wives ... It's a pretty good analogy imo. It's up to you/to the buying club to work out whether it's a personality trait or if there are enough mitigating circumstances (the husband/wife lost interest in sex years ago/drinks and is abusive/there's no love left/I'm not gonna win any trophies if I stay with this shit club)
ronk wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Does the concept of go swivel not mean anything to you.
Cos if the grass seemed greener to me elsewhere or my boss had pissed me of regardless of what I had signed I would do one.
And that's exactly why there are rules and contracts and all that sort of thing. We're not all Stuart Pearce.
Rag_hater wrote:ronk wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Does the concept of go swivel not mean anything to you.
Cos if the grass seemed greener to me elsewhere or my boss had pissed me of regardless of what I had signed I would do one.
And that's exactly why there are rules and contracts and all that sort of thing. We're not all Stuart Pearce.
Rules are often broken and contracts.There may be legal implications but nontheless thats the case.Always has been ,always will be.
Beefymcfc wrote:Rag_hater wrote:ronk wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Does the concept of go swivel not mean anything to you.
Cos if the grass seemed greener to me elsewhere or my boss had pissed me of regardless of what I had signed I would do one.
And that's exactly why there are rules and contracts and all that sort of thing. We're not all Stuart Pearce.
Rules are often broken and contracts.There may be legal implications but nontheless thats the case.Always has been ,always will be.
So mate, can you explain to me the consequences of breaking the contract?
Rag_hater wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Rag_hater wrote:ronk wrote:Rag_hater wrote:Does the concept of go swivel not mean anything to you.
Cos if the grass seemed greener to me elsewhere or my boss had pissed me of regardless of what I had signed I would do one.
And that's exactly why there are rules and contracts and all that sort of thing. We're not all Stuart Pearce.
Rules are often broken and contracts.There may be legal implications but nontheless thats the case.Always has been ,always will be.
So mate, can you explain to me the consequences of breaking the contract?
Dont know in this case.Something for the courts to decide.All the fans can do is moan at what a c*nt he is.
As if there has never been any c*nts before.
And I think estate agents do a job that has to be done and have no problem with gazzumping.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, nottsblue, salford city, stupot and 114 guests