Ted Hughes wrote:Slim wrote:Because there is 3 of Carroll and they will all sign with him?
£30M is a joke and Newcastle are beyond fools to reject that amount for a player who has been good for 6 months and has potential. Potentially he could end up being more like Carlton Cole than Andy, I would say it's more likely when you look at the percentage of players who fail vs those who succeed at this level.
Carroll is a different proposition to Carlton Cole. He's a different proposition to Drogba or Dzeko too. He is what he is; a proper old school centre forward. The only one of his kind who's any good. Some of you have probably never seen one. He doesn't have the class touch of a Drogba or a Dzeko but he's a good footballer & just as difficult, if not worse to play against & in his own way, just as effective. It may be that he'll stop scoring & become nothing more than a battering ram or a Kevin Davies. I'll be very surprised if that happens however. I recon the only thing that can stop Carroll is his stupid Geordie mentality. If he can rise above that & not get 'homesick' , pissed, etc then if he signs for a top club, he'll be scaring the fucking shit out of big lads like Vinny K, for years to come. It's all up to him being dedicated enough.
I'd love to have him at City & would swap half our squad for him but we wouldn't have a clue how to use him.
Duncan Ferguson.
Carroll's good but not in that top class bracket of forwards. Torres, Drogba, Anelka, Dzeko, Ibrahimovic, Berbatov, Adebayor, Klose etc have bridged the gap between quick feet and upper body strength. That's where the game's at these days. At a top side Carroll would be a dangerous option from the bench when reverting to longabll and set-pieces in need of a late goal. He's not sharp enough to lead the line of a fluid attack in my opinion (though I agree he is a good player and wouldn't mind us signing him.)