brite blu sky wrote:This thread shows up quite a lot of the differences in expectations. Why would the club treat the Europa any different from the CL ?
The only argument coming in is that it is not worth it.. due to it being less prestigious. Well let's accept that and take another angle.
How many of us really thought that City would get to the CL final.. I'd guess not many benny. So that then leaves what people thought the intention was... perhaps just doing ourselves credit and doing well. fair enough if so.
When asked to choose it seems fans were slightly more for concentrating on the Prem, rightly so imo.
So that again leaves the question what was the intention for the CL ? My own conclusion is what i thought going into it, purely experience of the challenges on offer and ramping things up in the squad to cope with 2 must win games a week.
Now prestige aside the same is still apparent in the Europa. Ok not top teams, but still difficult teams with different styles. The loss of experience against the very best is balanced out by the idea that City are good enough without the experience to reach the final and win it.
It is a fuckup that City didn't perform in the CL and got beat by teams that they should be giving a much harder game to. But the conclusion has to be that they were not ready.. therefore the Europa gives them a chance to sort the shit out and learn how to perform against continental teams.
The club needs to take it seriously and imo there is no doubt it will. Aside from the smack to pride I don't see why fans should not man up and realise this and also take it seriously.
Apparently Razak has been recalled to play v Arsenal, so he may get in the Europa team too.
brite blu sky wrote:hmm i rekon the club and even Mancini will be more sanguine about the diff between CL and Europa in terms of where the club is... and still take it as seriously. Wouldn't read too much into Bob saying it was important.. of course it was.
anyway we will differ on that i'm sure.
off topicApparently Razak has been recalled to play v Arsenal, so he may get in the Europa team too.
If that is the sole reason then this will do Razak a power of good.. I likes this.
Crossie wrote:We would be instant favourites. I dont like that.
Ted Hughes wrote:I shouild imagine the rags will be favourites.
lets all have a disco wrote:That for me is one of the worst aspects going back to Sunday games it WILL affect our league form as were always playing catch up.
brite blu sky wrote:This thread shows up quite a lot of the differences in expectations. Why would the club treat the Europa any different from the CL ?
The only argument coming in is that it is not worth it.. due to it being less prestigious. Well let's accept that and take another angle.
How many of us really thought that City would get to the CL final.. I'd guess not many benny. So that then leaves what people thought the intention was... perhaps just doing ourselves credit and doing well. fair enough if so.
When asked to choose it seems fans were slightly more for concentrating on the Prem, rightly so imo.
So that again leaves the question what was the intention for the CL ? My own conclusion is what i thought going into it, purely experience of the challenges on offer and ramping things up in the squad to cope with 2 must win games a week.
Now prestige aside the same is still apparent in the Europa. Ok not top teams, but still difficult teams with different styles. The loss of experience against the very best is balanced out by the idea that City are good enough without the experience to reach the final and win it.
It is a fuckup that City didn't perform in the CL and got beat by teams that they should be giving a much harder game to. But the conclusion has to be that they were not ready.. therefore the Europa gives them a chance to sort the shit out and learn how to perform against continental teams.
The club needs to take it seriously and imo there is no doubt it will. Aside from the smack to pride I don't see why fans should not man up and realise this and also take it seriously.
brite blu sky wrote:It is true there is a hit on the financial side.. I don't know what the difference would be between last 16 of the CL and getting to the final of the Europa.. even winning it ? Supercup?
As for the future and co-efficients, ideally we would have wanted to improve to avoid groups like we got this time, but I also have something ringing in my head about If you are going to try and win something then you have to beat the best teams.
Perhaps a question to ask ourselves is how many attempts would we see as being acceptable before really getting somewhere in the CL ?
brite blu sky wrote:I have a sneaky there is a bit more to it than that. Read somewhere City will 'gain' 20-23mil just from being in the CL group stage. I presume that is a grand total of TV, prize, match day revenue and sponsor extras and whatever else.. merchandise?
If there is fucl all for winning the Europa, there is still all the matchday and TV etc etc, although that too will be less obviously but would start to add up if you get as far as the final.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:brite blu sky wrote:I have a sneaky there is a bit more to it than that. Read somewhere City will 'gain' 20-23mil just from being in the CL group stage. I presume that is a grand total of TV, prize, match day revenue and sponsor extras and whatever else.. merchandise?
If there is fucl all for winning the Europa, there is still all the matchday and TV etc etc, although that too will be less obviously but would start to add up if you get as far as the final.
Blatter and his pet monkey fucked up the Europa league.....the Premiership is far more important to focus on than that Cup.We should only field our number 1 side if we get to the semi final..games before that we should send our B team a sno way do I want Aguero et al to get injured playing against a team from Lithuania.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, carolina-blue, city72, Majestic-12 [Bot], salford city and 201 guests