carl_feedthegoat wrote:Incredible how all the anger is aimed at the guy that didnt cost us the game.
ONE LAST TIME...KOMPANY COST US THE GAME....PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
You changed the partnership son, where alse do we go?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Incredible how all the anger is aimed at the guy that didnt cost us the game.
ONE LAST TIME...KOMPANY COST US THE GAME....PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
Beefymcfc wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Incredible how all the anger is aimed at the guy that didnt cost us the game.
ONE LAST TIME...KOMPANY COST US THE GAME....PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
You changed the partnership son, where alse do we go?
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:Looked good apart from the time he got spun for the Benzema goal.
Still no need the break up a great partnership on a night like tonight. You can't look at one guy and say "Yeah, he played well but everyone around him was shit". It's the whole make up of a team, and the fact that this guy was drafted in can easily affect others.
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:Looked good apart from the time he got spun for the Benzema goal.
Still no need the break up a great partnership on a night like tonight. You can't look at one guy and say "Yeah, he played well but everyone around him was shit". It's the whole make up of a team, and the fact that this guy was drafted in can easily affect others.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:the new (old) kompany
not perfect but a very decent performance on debut vs real fucking madrid
I thought he did ok considering.There were a few mistakes
carl_feedthegoat wrote:mr_nool wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:mr_nool wrote:PeterParker wrote:He played the second best team in the world for his debut at City facing Benzema and Higuain and that spastic di Maria.
He has done well. Big games will take him to the next level.
I agree on that. Given the circumstances he did well. But I don't think it was the right decision to play him. It didn't make life easier for Kompany either.
Fuck me your a biggger tit than I thought..........now Nasti gets the blame for Kompanys fuck ups.
Listen stupid....Mancini thought that Nasti ahead of Lescott (who has fucked up all season) was the way to go...and he was right..so your opinion is like you..worthless.
do one.
I'M NOT BLAMING NASTI FOR KOMPANY'S MISTAKES YOU STOOOOPID FUCKING CUNT.
But why the hell give an already shaky Kompany two new (I count Maicon as new) partners? Away. At Bernabeu. Against Real Madrid?
Try to see past individual performances and mistakes just for once!
what you and your ilk cannot understand is WHY MANCINI MADE THE CHANGES today???? he made them because we have leaked in goals galore with lescott/Kompany partnership since the latter of last season....its not a change he made willy fucking nilly.
KOMPANY LOST US THE GAME TODAY..HE WAS AT FAULT FOR 2 GOALS......WATCH THE BASTID HIGHLIGHTS.
Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Bobby has a bad habit of every now and again dropping lescott for a big game and no matter how many numpties bang on about it being the right call, until we win one of them it's bullshit.
V Arsenal - dropped for boyata, lost 3-0
V Liverpool - dropped for kolo, lucky to draw 2-2
V Madrid - dropped for Nasti, lost 3-2
When one of these dropping lescott master strokes results in 3 pts I'll join Carl's band wagon, until then we are chopping last seasons best (and championship) defense and not once has it worked.
Dubciteh wrote:
You forgot Bayern last season away too but your point stands.
Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.
A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.
Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.
All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.
Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.
Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.
A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.
Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.
All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.
Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.
I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.
Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide
Ted Hughes wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.
A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.
Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.
All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.
Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.
I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.
Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide
Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.
Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.
A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.
Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.
All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.
Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.
I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.
Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide
Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.
Not in Europe Kolo wouldn't
Ted Hughes wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.
A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.
Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.
All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.
Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.
I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.
Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide
Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.
Not in Europe Kolo wouldn't
Not ideal but better than a 19 year old kid imo & better than most club's backup cb.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Nickyboy, nottsblue and 100 guests