nasti

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: nasti

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:00 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Incredible how all the anger is aimed at the guy that didnt cost us the game.


ONE LAST TIME...KOMPANY COST US THE GAME....PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

You changed the partnership son, where alse do we go?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: nasti

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:10 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Incredible how all the anger is aimed at the guy that didnt cost us the game.


ONE LAST TIME...KOMPANY COST US THE GAME....PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

You changed the partnership son, where alse do we go?


Im busy disecting the performance , Ill get back to you.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32252
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: nasti

Postby LookMumImOnMCF.net » Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:14 pm

Looked good apart from the time he got spun for the Benzema goal.

Still no need the break up a great partnership on a night like tonight. You can't look at one guy and say "Yeah, he played well but everyone around him was shit". It's the whole make up of a team, and the fact that this guy was drafted in can easily affect others.
LookMumImOnMCF.net
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9316
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:49 pm
Supporter of: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net
My favourite player is: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net

Re: nasti

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:17 pm

LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:Looked good apart from the time he got spun for the Benzema goal.

Still no need the break up a great partnership on a night like tonight. You can't look at one guy and say "Yeah, he played well but everyone around him was shit". It's the whole make up of a team, and the fact that this guy was drafted in can easily affect others.


Our defence was shit prior to anyone coming in tonight..whats Mancini supposed to do? carry on with both lescott and Kompany and hope it clicks?????

Bolloks....he had to make a change and it would have worked out if kompany had done his job..fuck all to do with anyone else with that 3rd goal...second he just let him pass by...but the 3rd was his fault and his alone 100%.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32252
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: nasti

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:07 am

Bobby has a bad habit of every now and again dropping lescott for a big game and no matter how many numpties bang on about it being the right call, until we win one of them it's bullshit.

V Arsenal - dropped for boyata, lost 3-0

V Liverpool - dropped for kolo, lucky to draw 2-2

V Madrid - dropped for Nasti, lost 3-2

When one of these dropping lescott master strokes results in 3 pts I'll join Carl's band wagon, until then we are chopping last seasons best (and championship) defense and not once has it worked.
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13382
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: nasti

Postby bluej » Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:25 am

LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:Looked good apart from the time he got spun for the Benzema goal.

Still no need the break up a great partnership on a night like tonight. You can't look at one guy and say "Yeah, he played well but everyone around him was shit". It's the whole make up of a team, and the fact that this guy was drafted in can easily affect others.


Glad to see a voice of reason amongst the usual others who make sense (Ted etc). If the defensive unit is struggling for form, dropping a regular starter for someone making their debut, alongside someone making their second appearance isn't going to help.
bluej
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:11 am
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: nasti

Postby phips » Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:53 am

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Nigels Tackle wrote:the new (old) kompany

not perfect but a very decent performance on debut vs real fucking madrid


I thought he did ok considering.There were a few mistakes

I thought the same...dont think he can be blamed for Benzema's goal. That was a great striker's goal.
I'm not really a City fan. I'm just here for attention.

Barclays Premier League 2011-2012 CHAMP1-6NS
Barclays Premier League 2013-2014 CHAMP156NS
Barclays Premier League 2017-2018 CHAMP100NS
Barclays Premier League 2018-2019 CHAMP14ONS
Barclays Premier League 2020-2021 CHAM21ONS
Barclays Premier League 2021-2022 CHAM93ONS
Barclays Premier League 2022-2023 CHAM3XIONS
2022-2023 Domestic & European TR3BLE WINNERS
Barclays Premier League 2023-2024 CH4MPIONS
phips
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8335
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: California
Supporter of: Man City, Dortmund
My favourite player is: David Silva, Marco Reus

Re: nasti

Postby Rag_hater » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:29 am

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
mr_nool wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
mr_nool wrote:
PeterParker wrote:He played the second best team in the world for his debut at City facing Benzema and Higuain and that spastic di Maria.

He has done well. Big games will take him to the next level.


I agree on that. Given the circumstances he did well. But I don't think it was the right decision to play him. It didn't make life easier for Kompany either.


Fuck me your a biggger tit than I thought..........now Nasti gets the blame for Kompanys fuck ups.


Listen stupid....Mancini thought that Nasti ahead of Lescott (who has fucked up all season) was the way to go...and he was right..so your opinion is like you..worthless.

do one.


I'M NOT BLAMING NASTI FOR KOMPANY'S MISTAKES YOU STOOOOPID FUCKING CUNT.
But why the hell give an already shaky Kompany two new (I count Maicon as new) partners? Away. At Bernabeu. Against Real Madrid?
Try to see past individual performances and mistakes just for once!


what you and your ilk cannot understand is WHY MANCINI MADE THE CHANGES today???? he made them because we have leaked in goals galore with lescott/Kompany partnership since the latter of last season....its not a change he made willy fucking nilly.

KOMPANY LOST US THE GAME TODAY..HE WAS AT FAULT FOR 2 GOALS......WATCH THE BASTID HIGHLIGHTS.


Maybe Kompany should have been benched then.
Image
Rag_hater
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5470
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:24 pm
Location: Alicante Spain

Re: nasti

Postby Dubciteh » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:30 am

Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Bobby has a bad habit of every now and again dropping lescott for a big game and no matter how many numpties bang on about it being the right call, until we win one of them it's bullshit.

V Arsenal - dropped for boyata, lost 3-0

V Liverpool - dropped for kolo, lucky to draw 2-2

V Madrid - dropped for Nasti, lost 3-2

When one of these dropping lescott master strokes results in 3 pts I'll join Carl's band wagon, until then we are chopping last seasons best (and championship) defense and not once has it worked.


You forgot Bayern last season away too but your point stands.
derby day the scores were level,
then the goat was fed by neville,
silly boy should know for sure,
feed the goat and he will score!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Dubciteh
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8628
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:49 am
Location: Dublin
Supporter of: CTID
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: nasti

Postby Pretty Boy Lee » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:46 am

Dubciteh wrote:
You forgot Bayern last season away too but your point stands.


Cheers, I'm shocked I remembered the 3, it's a worrying pattern tho.
Pretty Boy Lee
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13382
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Brisbane baby!
Supporter of: City!
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: nasti

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:51 am

Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.

A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.

Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.

All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.

Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: nasti

Postby sheblue » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:51 am

crazy stuff to throw nasti in there like that for his debut.....madness sheer fucking madness.
sheblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12555
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:28 pm
Supporter of: city
My favourite player is: silva

Re: nasti

Postby Alex Sapphire » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:55 am

Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.

A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.

Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.

All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.

Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.


I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.

Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: nasti

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:59 am

Alex Sapphire wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.

A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.

Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.

All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.

Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.


I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.

Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide


Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: nasti

Postby Alex Sapphire » Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:04 am

Ted Hughes wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.

A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.

Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.

All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.

Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.


I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.

Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide


Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.


Not in Europe Kolo wouldn't
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: nasti

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:07 am

Alex Sapphire wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.

A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.

Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.

All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.

Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.


I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.

Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide


Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.


Not in Europe Kolo wouldn't


Not ideal but better than a 19 year old kid imo & better than most club's backup cb.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: nasti

Postby Alex Sapphire » Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:08 am

Ted Hughes wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
Alex Sapphire wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Even though imo he shouldn't have been anywhere near the team & he dropped a plethora of bollocks, I think we saw last night that this lad could actually turn out to be the player we hoped Savic would be.

A 19 year old was always going to drop bollocks in a game like that but all of the basics were there. In the case of Savic, there was nothing to work with but in this lad you can see how, with the right coaching, he has all the raw attributes to be a defender.

Although he was often out of position in the basic team set up, as an individual he still managed to spot things & make some really good, situation saving, interceptions, something Savic never did. As well as a natural ability to read the game, he looks like he can tackle, head, is reasonably quick & once he settled down, he got off some nice passes.

All in all, an excellent signing for the future imo.

Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night though.


I mostly agree. Looked good and potentially a very classy player.

Not sure who you'd have on the bench ahead of him though. And a bench without a CB would have been suicide


Kolo & Maicon would have been my defenders on the bench.


Not in Europe Kolo wouldn't


Not ideal but better than a 19 year old kid imo & better than most club's backup cb.


I mean he was left out of the UEFA CL squad
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: nasti

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:10 am

Oh right.

Fair enough, not much choice then. Another mistake.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: nasti

Postby Mike J » Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:01 am

I was actually really impressed. Im surprised by a few comments in this thread. I agree it was a mistake to play him but i thought he actually coped well. Made a few errors but who doesnt. Not going to judge him on one extremely hard game but hopefully this kid has a huge future.
User avatar
Mike J
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:48 pm
Supporter of: Who do you think
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: nasti

Postby bernabias_right_boot » Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:23 am

Thought he did well, apart from the time I screamed at the telly for him to get a bit fucking tighter on Benzema!

I wouldn't be surprised if RM has factored a defeat last night into the CL equation and what he sees is different to what we see as fans.
I guess he saw an opportunity to find out what Nasti is made of and would've been impressed.
Nasri's injury would've fucked up his options if we had a lead going into the final minutes as we had no subs left, so no chance to shore up in from of the defence.
But wtf was Vinnie doing for the third?
bernabias_right_boot
Darius Vassell's Composure
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent
Supporter of: CTID
My favourite player is: Carlito

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Nickyboy, nottsblue and 100 guests