Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Original Dub wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Original Dub wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I think Bale's far better than a lot on your list. But even if you don't, the one thing he has over most of those players is time on his side. He's 24 which gives him another 6, 7 or maybe even 8 years at the top. I
I think it's fair to say he isn't currently in the top five players in world football.
Kaka was when we bid for him.
That is my point.
In your opinion he isn't. In mine and several others he is.
That is my point.
Who are the "several others" who believe he is very close to being the best player in world football?
Clearly Real Madrid do for starters.
And i'm not saying he's the best or 'very close'. Ronaldo and Messi are head and shoulders above anyone else. I'd say Bale's top 5 though with potential to be right up there.
Oh, I thought you meant folk on here, not the bidding club. There's not much point in going into that debate, because of course, based on your theory, every high transfer paid for a player is warranted, merely by virtue of the fact that a bid was made.
I'm not sure of the top 5 rankings for the latest FIFA World Player of the Year?