Ted Hughes wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:If he loves him so much then why did he start with the second string last night?
Btw he was successful with 95% of his tackles against Chelsea and to all those that say he just passes backwards and sideways have a look at the graph provided in this link
http://squawka.com/news/2013/10/28/play ... 3102829754
I don't think he's good enough for our first XI but as seems the norm he is ridiculed by many for not being world class. It's all a bit pathetic really.
Tend to think these things are built on bollocks, but Garcia did play reasonably well that day imo.
I also, very sadly, thought that Cahill, Terry & Ivanovic (3 players who, 2 years ago, when our defence was good, were nowhere near good enough to get in our team & haven't improved) were miles beter than Nastasic & Zabs, who were both ball watching for much of the game & letting people run past/behind them, Clichy (who imo was playing better than Cole at that time) was a joke & if a manager had a choice of all 8 players for the next game, only Demichelis looked anywhere near good enough to get in Chelsea's starting back 4, but still wouldn't get in.
2 years ago, Zabs Vinny Lescott Clichy were head & shoulders a better back 4 than theirs & Hart was at least as good keeper.
Why so?
Somebody has decided that certain factors qualify for points plus and minus but how can it be an accurate system ? There are so many other factors in any given performance than just the obvious stats.
Ah right, I agree with you there, stats will never give the full picture and a rating system based on them is extremely flawed but at the same time they can't be just dismissed either.
For example, the claims by some that he can't tackle are clearly bullshit as are the claims that he just passes backwards and sideways as shown by the stats compiled. By all means criticise him, he has a number of flaws in his game, I just don't like to see him ridiculed over things that patently aren't true.