Mase wrote:"Smash" the British transfer fee?!!! "Smash"? Didn't the rags pay pretty much £60 mill for Di Maria? How would we be "smashing" that IF we did pay £1 million more than what they paid?
bigblue wrote:How you know a big City transfer is getting close... the player has gone to shit right before signing for us:
Flanked by "scouse to win trophies" and "Chase your dreams at chelsea"... ridiculous
Next thing you could see: "City sign £100 million scum flop. Couldn't even start over rafeal!"
Nigels Tackle wrote:can't we just swap him for all the balkan spastics?
Duckman wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:can't we just swap him for all the balkan spastics?
fuck off Im stayin
South Stand Balti wrote:I don't think this deal is anywhere near as close as the press are saying. The fee of £60m is being quoted by the Mirror but others are quoting £40m. Munich are supposedly interested too.
lets all have a disco wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:I don't think this deal is anywhere near as close as the press are saying. The fee of £60m is being quoted by the Mirror but others are quoting £40m. Munich are supposedly interested too.
Munchen have just spent a sack load on Vidal.
Ted Hughes wrote:I didn't like the look of him for Chelsea, at all but I am a convert to this & I think he can do for City, what we hoped Jovetic would do.
basically like he was never even there.
"Wolfsburg say they have not received an approach for Kevin De Bruyne despite strong media reports linking the former Chelsea midfielder with Manchester City…."Nothing has arrived here. And neither Kevin nor his agent have told me they want to leave," sporting director Klaus Allofs told the German media."
phips wrote:just saving face?"Wolfsburg say they have not received an approach for Kevin De Bruyne despite strong media reports linking the former Chelsea midfielder with Manchester City…."Nothing has arrived here. And neither Kevin nor his agent have told me they want to leave," sporting director Klaus Allofs told the German media."
bigblue wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I didn't like the look of him for Chelsea, at all but I am a convert to this & I think he can do for City, what we hoped Jovetic would do.
After playing 2 games for chelsea, he was benched for at least a month in between appearances, only playing 395 minutes over 9 apperances in his whole chelsea career. Not sure what you really saw to dislike in the first place. Never got the chance to get going, basically like he was never even there.
bigblue wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I didn't like the look of him for Chelsea, at all but I am a convert to this & I think he can do for City, what we hoped Jovetic would do.
After playing 2 games for chelsea, he was benched for at least a month in between appearances, only playing 395 minutes over 9 apperances in his whole chelsea career. Not sure what you really saw to dislike in the first place. Never got the chance to get going, basically like he was never even there.
zuricity wrote:bigblue wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I didn't like the look of him for Chelsea, at all but I am a convert to this & I think he can do for City, what we hoped Jovetic would do.
After playing 2 games for chelsea, he was benched for at least a month in between appearances, only playing 395 minutes over 9 apperances in his whole chelsea career. Not sure what you really saw to dislike in the first place. Never got the chance to get going, basically like he was never even there.
Spot on.
Well said.. Some rubbish written on here at times.
Goals Assists K. De Bruyne 15 25 Alexis Sanchez 24 9 Eden Hazard 20 11 Cesc Fabregas 6 21 Gareth Bale 17 10 David Silva 12 8 Yaya Toure 12 1 James Milner 8 7 Raheem Sterling 8 8 Paul Pogba 10 6 Santi Cazorla 7 13 Marco Reus 10 6 Ivan Rakitic 8 8 Isco 6 9 Angel Di Maria 4 10 B. Schweinsteiger 5 4 Arturo Vidal 8 4 |
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, gmercer1, Google [Bot], Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], Nick, PeterParker, stupot and 97 guests