Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba well worth the world-record fee. He was as anonymous in the second half as he was in the first.
It really is amazing how the media aren't all over this abject cunt and his price tag ..........
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba well worth the world-record fee. He was as anonymous in the second half as he was in the first.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba well worth the world-record fee. He was as anonymous in the second half as he was in the first.
patrickblue wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba well worth the world-record fee. He was as anonymous in the second half as he was in the first.
Thought he was better first half.
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:His nose was a mile offside, in fact his nose is always a mile offside but this time his head was too.
london blue 2 wrote:Apparently IF scum took all their chances theyd be on more points now.
Clowns
Woodyblue wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Apparently IF scum took all their chances theyd be on more points now.
Clowns
Keep getting that off a rag at work who keeps saying that if they would've just scored one more goal in all the games they'd drawn they would be top of the league now. I keep telling him that if they'd scored one less in those games they'd be in the bottom six
Original Dub wrote:The amount of times they replayed the offside goal to explain the travesty was cringeworthy.
Mark my words, it will be played in a loop on ssn tomorrow with the commentary "united were unlucky to have a goal ruled out"
While sterling having both his legs taken out from underneath him by milner was a "chance he really should have taken".
Sky LOVE the rags.
Beefymcfc wrote:Original Dub wrote:The amount of times they replayed the offside goal to explain the travesty was cringeworthy.
Mark my words, it will be played in a loop on ssn tomorrow with the commentary "united were unlucky to have a goal ruled out"
While sterling having both his legs taken out from underneath him by milner was a "chance he really should have taken".
Sky LOVE the rags.
I still don't get why I've only seen one angle of the Sterling penalty shout?
globalbollox wrote:Wasn't there a game on Sunday where someone pretended to head the ball but played it with their arm instead. The decision? NO PEN!!!!!
Fortunately the game was on BT so 'Sky Hermeneutics Inhouse Team' don't get their red meat to work with.Original Dub wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Original Dub wrote:The amount of times they replayed the offside goal to explain the travesty was cringeworthy.
Mark my words, it will be played in a loop on ssn tomorrow with the commentary "united were unlucky to have a goal ruled out"
While sterling having both his legs taken out from underneath him by milner was a "chance he really should have taken".
Sky LOVE the rags.
I still don't get why I've only seen one angle of the Sterling penalty shout?
The editing has really become a big weapon with sky this season in particular. Simple and very effective when steering the sheep into the other field.
Original Dub wrote:The amount of times they replayed the offside goal to explain the travesty was cringeworthy.
Mark my words, it will be played in a loop on ssn tomorrow with the commentary "united were unlucky to have a goal ruled out"
While sterling having both his legs taken out from underneath him by milner was a "chance he really should have taken".
Sky LOVE the rags.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Original Dub wrote:The amount of times they replayed the offside goal to explain the travesty was cringeworthy.
Mark my words, it will be played in a loop on ssn tomorrow with the commentary "united were unlucky to have a goal ruled out"
While sterling having both his legs taken out from underneath him by milner was a "chance he really should have taken".
Sky LOVE the rags.
I don't quite know how the video ref thing will work but if it's anything like cricket the off side decision would have stood anyway. Umpires decision stands when it's very close. Anyway it was offside.
All goes to help the deflection from the poor performance though doesn't it. That and the amazing attack on Shaw which didn't need to be done ( especially as he played quite well) and was clearly planned. I reckon he only put him on as a sub so he could make his planned attack on him.
It's true that Utd had a number of very close calls. Woodwork twice and a couple of decent altho not that special saves but it does seem to me they mostly "create" chances by lifting the ball into the box in hope or shoot from 25 yards rather than with much cultured football. Maybe Jose should focus on how to play good quality football or maybe that's just not what he does.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
All goes to help the deflection from the poor performance though doesn't it. That and the amazing attack on Shaw which didn't need to be done ( especially as he played quite well) and was clearly planned. I reckon he only put him on as a sub so he could make his planned attack on him.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Hazy2, john@staustell, Nigels Tackle, salford city, trueblue64 and 155 guests