Paranoia and Conspiracy Theories

[Beefymcfc]

Still nothing about the Mario incident? I smell a rat, and not the one on Clattenburg's head.

They have charged him with violent conduct, mate. It doesn't help us in any way at all though and seeing as it was our player who was elbowed, it is somewhat missing the point.

Cheers mate, at least they have acknowledged it. I suppose it was a case of when rather than if.

Strange that his actions will go to help out Chelsea, Swansea and Liverpool rather than us, but that's the game.

[Tokyo Blue]

Things happen but I don't believe the bias is as big (if at all) as some make out. Some shocking decisions certainly but out and out bias from the refs? ... nah

There should logically be a roughly equal number of things going the other way if that is the case. Where are they?

Thats it, I can't think of that many iffy decisions that have gone our way recently and only a couple last season but I'm sure if you went on other teams sites they'd be highlighting loads ... from their perspective of course, just like some do with the Rags etc.

Wilko has been charged then .... so trhat one I've noticed ;) (albeit a tad too late for our bbenefit as you say)

QED.

[Beefymcfc]

I'm just watching ITV and all's I can say is 'Fuck you Cunts'!

So, you try to blame Joe and then throw it on Bobby; you cunts! Every other time you would support your country, today you supported an ex-Pre Player and Manager. Fuck Cunts at the heighest level.

Come near me fuckwits, I'll show you what its like to just pass away. You are all Cunts!


PS. Dixon tried, he's just not got it.

[ashton287]

Question on the chase today was "which football team made an annual loss of 194 million, the largest in football history".

That question didn't need the "largest in football history" part and i have never seen a football question on there before so it was obviously written by some rag cunt. The bias is everywhere when your as paranoid as me.

[Original Dub]

Question on the chase today was "which football team made an annual loss of 194 million, the largest in football history".

That question didn't need the "largest in football history" part and i have never seen a football question on there before so it was obviously written by some rag cunt. The bias is everywhere when your as paranoid as me.

Mate the bias is everywhere.

I'm at the stage now where I'm not sure if I hate the bias cunts as much as I hate the fucking fucktards on here that try to say it doesn't exist.

[Beefymcfc]

I'm turning over a new leaf and will not be adding anymore to this thread. Tin foil is off and I will now see the world through the same utopian eyes as my fellow non-paranoid/deluded City fans.

Here's to a whole new world. May peace be with us all.

[Beefymcfc]

I'm not biting!

[ashton287]

Fucking joke. Not even a funny joke.

MOTD stayed true to form aswell showing the scum cheating and then giving the ref 10/10 and then not even showing the foul on aguero. Not a fucking mention of it.

They make me hate football.

[Tokyo Blue]

Fucking joke. Not even a funny joke.

MOTD stayed true to form aswell showing the scum cheating and then giving the ref 10/10 and then not even showing the foul on aguero. Not a fucking mention of it.

They make me hate football.

You see, I think that's what they want. To remove all dissenters by battering them into submission with constant repetition of the party line. Selective reporting has been a disturbing trend in Britain for a number of years. Why would football be exempt?

[ashton287]

Just had a report on granade news about the Liverpool. V scum game.

Talked about Liverpool fans tweeting about halsey having throat cancer but no mention of the scum fans. They were immaculate according to this show.

Lying cuntholes.

[blue 68]

When is this obvious bias to the rags going to be investigated or even just aired in a real honest debate in the Premier League?
I am seriously getting the hump with the game in general and unless something is done about the standard and fairness of refereeing decisions it is going to end my involvement in the game, otherwise what is the point.
Surely nobody can doubt the mounting evidence that certain clubs get more than just the rub of the green from certain refs.

[Original Dub]

When is this obvious bias to the rags going to be investigated or even just aired in a real honest debate in the Premier League?
I am seriously getting the hump with the game in general and unless something is done about the standard and fairness of refereeing decisions it is going to end my involvement in the game, otherwise what is the point.
Surely nobody can doubt the mounting evidence that certain clubs get more than just the rub of the green from certain refs.

Mate there are even one or two idiots on this board that can't see it. It's incredible.

[gillie]

Yesterday 2 identical challenges were made one resulted in a red card the other in a yellow card.These challenges were made in the same game so if the referee is not being biased towards one team how can he make 2 different decisions for the same offence.The reality is he bottled his second decision or he was press ganged into his first.Mark Halsey bottled his second decision imo because he would have had to send off the new saviour of the rags.

[Bianchi on Ice]

Yesterday 2 identical challenges were made one resulted in a red card the other in a yellow card.These challenges were made in the same game so if the referee is not being biased towards one team how can he make 2 different decisions for the same offence.The reality is he bottled his second decision or he was press ganged into his first.Mark Halsey bottled his second decision imo because he would have had to send off the new saviour of the rags.

Exactly Gillie and is anyone at the fa gonna run through the game with halsey and ask him why?. This thread is gonna run and run because the stitch up is on..its a heist. The theft of fair play. Ffs they arent even waiting for the run in...the carve up has to start now otherwise it wont work! Thats how far behind us the scum are

[london blue 2]

First time i've seen this angle of the Jon Jo red card



Which looks more dangerous?

[Tokyo Blue]

I find it impossible to tell conclusively on a still. However there is only one of those players going in with two feet.

[london blue 2]

I find it impossible to tell conclusively on a still. However there is only one of those players going in with two feet.

Slur alex said it's ok as Evans got the ball...

This one still pisses me off. Nothing was mentioned about it after the VK sending off! Amazing.

[Tokyo Blue]

I find it impossible to tell conclusively on a still. However there is only one of those players going in with two feet.

Slur alex said it's ok as Evans got the ball...

This one still pisses me off. Nothing was mentioned about it after the VK sending off! Amazing.

Couldn't agree more, mate.

[Duckman]

First time i've seen this angle of the Jon Jo red card



Which looks more dangerous?

a bit earlier, they both had their foot on the ball.

that scum penalty is nonsense.
windmills...

[Way to Blue]

Halsey is unlikely to give a penalty again in the near future - guess which game he is reffing at the weekend