Ted Hughes wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Well it was before the Arse game anyway so I think he'll be happier to have been chosen/trusted for a big game & may not have made those comments if asked this week. It could also be that this wasn't an interview as such but a few comments made in private which he didn't realise were on the record, having a general moan after missing the Blackpool game.
Whatever the ins-and-outs are, they become irrelevant once they are depicted in this way. If Mancini sees these quotes, which undoubtedly he will, then I would suggest he will take it as a personal attack on himself which leaves Micah in a very awkward position. It also brings into question other peoples loyalties which may also impact on their status at the club.
Silly silly boy, in my humble opinion.
I don't see it as an attack at all, it's just a statement of fact for the most part. If Bob decides to victimise Micah for that whilst letting other players do what they like, I'll lose all respect for him.
"City are second and they will say what the manager is doing is working and keeping us fresh but I know my ability and I want to show it.
"I'm not the sort of player who can just sit around and bank his wages.
"I've got no problem with the club or Roberto Mancini as a manager but he knows how I feel.
"I went to see the boss and told him how frustrated I was.
"He said I was part of his plans but I went three Premier League games without even getting on, started against Aston Villa, then didn't play against Blackpool.
"Sometimes I'm in, then Jerome Boateng comes in instead, or Pablo Zabaleta, or two of us play.
"It's in, out, in, out, mix and match.
"I could understand being left out when Mark Hughes was in charge because I wasn't playing that well and was going through a bad time.
"We didn't have so many good players but I wasn't at my best.
"I wasn't in the team at the end of last season under Mancini either but I worked really hard in pre- season and was determined to become an important part of the team. I feel I've been playing well. I'm confident in my ability and know when my game is in good shape, which right now it is.
"When I first got into the team as a teenager everything was going great but I hadn't really learned the game properly and I sort of crashed for a while.
"But I'm a different person now, I've learned, and I'm happy with my game again. Mancini says I've improved a lot but it's not getting me regular starts.
"I've never really been used to sitting on the bench and not playing and I hate it.
"I don't feel it's acceptable to me if I'm honest.
"We've got a ridiculous amount of players, so many in every position who are all top quality and there are plenty of good players who don't get in at all.
"We travel with 21 and three don't even get to be sub.
"You hope the club understands that they have to let people go and not leave them to rot.
"Players like Shaun Wright-Phillips have been frustrated at not playing as has Adam Johnson. Shaun was told the same thing by Mr Capello that I was, that he needs to get regular football.
"I feel more for Adam, particularly, because he could find himself in the same situation as me and Shaun. He's a young man who wants to be playing too and he has said that a few times this season.
"I love City. I've been there since I was 15 and I got capped by England while playing for this club.
"But having reached that level I want to keep myself up there.
"This is not me telling the boss, 'you must pick me for every game', I'm just telling it as I feel it.
"I want to be somewhere where I'm kicking a ball every week."
Ted Hughes wrote:What's wrong with currants?
Ted Hughes wrote:Woah hang on, I haven't said he should play instead of Zabba or that he's right to blart stuff out in public, I disagree with both.
It's most certainly not an attack on Mancini though. There's not one word of criticism for Mancini. He doesn't say Mancini is wrong about anything, just that the club shouldn't hang onto players they don't want. He's right; they shouldn't.
Mancio4ever wrote:Side note: I’d like to take the Micah out/Nedum in post as a good fun: It wouldn’t be any good, either technically and professionally wise.
Beefymcfc wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Woah hang on, I haven't said he should play instead of Zabba or that he's right to blart stuff out in public, I disagree with both.
It's most certainly not an attack on Mancini though. There's not one word of criticism for Mancini. He doesn't say Mancini is wrong about anything, just that the club shouldn't hang onto players they don't want. He's right; they shouldn't.
OK mate, we'll just have to see things differently, but if he's going to tell all and sundry that he should be playing instead of the likes of Zab and make it quite clear that Mancini is wrong in his choices, then in my mind what he is actually saying is that the manager doesn't know what he's doing.
But you are right, if we don't want him let him go; just the same way Nedum and Beller's went.
PS. I'd usually poo-poo these type of stories but on this occassion, I think it's true.
Ted Hughes wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Woah hang on, I haven't said he should play instead of Zabba or that he's right to blart stuff out in public, I disagree with both.
It's most certainly not an attack on Mancini though. There's not one word of criticism for Mancini. He doesn't say Mancini is wrong about anything, just that the club shouldn't hang onto players they don't want. He's right; they shouldn't.
OK mate, we'll just have to see things differently, but if he's going to tell all and sundry that he should be playing instead of the likes of Zab and make it quite clear that Mancini is wrong in his choices, then in my mind what he is actually saying is that the manager doesn't know what he's doing.
But you are right, if we don't want him let him go; just the same way Nedum and Beller's went.
PS. I'd usually poo-poo these type of stories but on this occassion, I think it's true.
Mancini has already said about 50 times that he wants players who aren't in the team to be pissed off & thinking they should be in the team, not players who just accept it. As he says' "ees normal".
Ted Hughes wrote:What's wrong with currants?
sandman wrote:I've just changed my mind on Richards, its easy to forget he's still only 22, I have just been reminded by a member of staff at the club.
My view has been changed after a dicussion at length, the lad has another two years until he is expected to be at the peak of his career, if he can listen and learn off players around him like Vieira and Kolo Toure that have done it in the prem, if he can gain a little more spacial awareness and if he can start tracking back after pushing forward then he still has at least 8 years (injury depending) in the premier league. He still has a lot of potential and has time to develop, plus he is in a position where he can still play aged 30+.
I must apologise any earlier criticisms I have had (not only in this thread), these were based on how long he has been at the club, not on how long he has been in football. It is strange how much a view can change after speaking to someone REALLY in the know.
Beefymcfc wrote:I read something last year about Max Clifford being his publicist and, just maybe, he may have thrown this out to the Sun to get maximum publicity to one of his boys.
Just thinking out loud.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 254 guests