Mase wrote:We need Kolarov starting.
100 percent we dont, really handy to have a LB who doesnt defend.
Mase wrote:We need Kolarov starting.
Superbia wrote:Mase wrote:We need Kolarov starting.
100 percent we dont, really handy to have a LB who doesnt defend.
Cocacolajojo wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
I watch quite a lot of it & not only do I struggle to find players like DeRossi, I struggle to find players in any position who would greatly improve City's squad. There are lots of 'maybe's but only a handful of definites & those are either unattainable or very very expensive. Most of the players who play a decent game or two v City, get threads on the net with scores of City fans saying 'sign him' but when you watch most of them, they are not doing better in their own leagues than the player they would replace at City is already doing, for City, in the Prem.
The absolute definite, 100% nailed on certainty to improve our squad was Hazard imo. With us, he would be twice the player he is at Chelsea already.
But IF DeRossi is fit enough, I recon he's as close to a 100% certainty to be a success at City as you could possibly get.
Hazard is great isn't he. I mean we still have to wait and see if he develops even further. However... His decision making and football intelligence is really excellent considering he's what, 12 (21). Most players at that age are naive in comparison.
ruralblue wrote:[highlight]Ok the football hasn't always been entertaining and grinding out the odd win but champions have to do that. Also something evidently wring in defence but think that's to do with changes to formation and lack of consistency of pairings. However we ARE second, defeated and two points behind them rag twats so not all is the doom and gloom some posters make out. Change nothing in regards to management, the chaps brought us a fa cup, premiership title and some tin pot plate![/highlight]
We are City, we always do things the hard way, t'is why I love them so much.
[highlight]this tixi bloke should be able to pull the odd star signing to make subtle not wholesale changes.[/highlight]
Beefymcfc wrote:Chip muffins, that's what we need. A dab of salt and a splash of vinegar would be wonderful.
dazby wrote:We need two things to occur.
Balo to score some goals.
The team to get a 3-0 result or better to boost the confidence.
That is all. Once we get the confidence going there will be no stopping us and we can continue our undefeated run.
Mancio4ever wrote:Superbia wrote:Mase wrote:We need Kolarov starting.
100 percent we dont, really handy to have a LB who doesnt defend.
I almost settled on the same idea along last spring till season end -credit's where credit's due to merit - but defensive wise, the Gael of this season so for is little short to an embarrassment: make no mistake, what he made in order to concede the 2nd (saying it with no intention to crucify a Lad of Ours) on Tuesday, is something that only one coach could fix: the Holy Spirit!Cocacolajojo wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
I watch quite a lot of it & not only do I struggle to find players like DeRossi, I struggle to find players in any position who would greatly improve City's squad. There are lots of 'maybe's but only a handful of definites & those are either unattainable or very very expensive. Most of the players who play a decent game or two v City, get threads on the net with scores of City fans saying 'sign him' but when you watch most of them, they are not doing better in their own leagues than the player they would replace at City is already doing, for City, in the Prem.
The absolute definite, 100% nailed on certainty to improve our squad was Hazard imo. With us, he would be twice the player he is at Chelsea already.
But IF DeRossi is fit enough, I recon he's as close to a 100% certainty to be a success at City as you could possibly get.
Hazard is great isn't he. I mean we still have to wait and see if he develops even further. However... His decision making and football intelligence is really excellent considering he's what, 12 (21). Most players at that age are naive in comparison.
Stop being "cheap", Pal.
Our Teddy, after having taught for almost a whole Academic Year, what actually we did have need to progress, decided that the preservation of the Sacred Image of "the most effective pub-football's Sporting Director of all times" comes ahead everything else, and accordingly he withdrew that chapter from His predicament of the present Academic Year.
Like every Erudite, though, he still knows.
Same knew another football connoisseur, the MCFC manager, who in fact agreed with Owner and Chairman to purchase Hazard and De Rossi: unfortunately something went wrong, but nobody is allowed to claim what [there is no evidence, They said!]
Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:Superbia wrote:Mase wrote:We need Kolarov starting.
100 percent we dont, really handy to have a LB who doesnt defend.
I almost settled on the same idea along last spring till season end -credit's where credit's due to merit - but defensive wise, the Gael of this season so for is little short to an embarrassment: make no mistake, what he made in order to concede the 2nd (saying it with no intention to crucify a Lad of Ours) on Tuesday, is something that only one coach could fix: the Holy Spirit!Cocacolajojo wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
I watch quite a lot of it & not only do I struggle to find players like DeRossi, I struggle to find players in any position who would greatly improve City's squad. There are lots of 'maybe's but only a handful of definites & those are either unattainable or very very expensive. Most of the players who play a decent game or two v City, get threads on the net with scores of City fans saying 'sign him' but when you watch most of them, they are not doing better in their own leagues than the player they would replace at City is already doing, for City, in the Prem.
The absolute definite, 100% nailed on certainty to improve our squad was Hazard imo. With us, he would be twice the player he is at Chelsea already.
But IF DeRossi is fit enough, I recon he's as close to a 100% certainty to be a success at City as you could possibly get.
Hazard is great isn't he. I mean we still have to wait and see if he develops even further. However... His decision making and football intelligence is really excellent considering he's what, 12 (21). Most players at that age are naive in comparison.
Stop being "cheap", Pal.
Our Teddy, after having taught for almost a whole Academic Year, what actually we did have need to progress, decided that the preservation of the Sacred Image of "the most effective pub-football's Sporting Director of all times" comes ahead everything else, and accordingly he withdrew that chapter from His predicament of the present Academic Year.
Like every Erudite, though, he still knows.
Same knew another football connoisseur, the MCFC manager, who in fact agreed with Owner and Chairman to purchase Hazard and De Rossi: unfortunately something went wrong, but nobody is allowed to claim what [there is no evidence, They said!]
We know what went wrong; they refused to sell DeRossi. It was mentioned at their board meeting recently & has been repeated again, so it is now public knowledge. No amount of made up, bullshit stories can change that. It is possible that they will decide to sell him now, as they are struggling & he is apparently pissed off with it all.
It is also possible that the Spaniards will refuse to let Mancini buy him, as they have much more power than the previous bloke.
Hazy2 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:Superbia wrote:Mase wrote:We need Kolarov starting.
100 percent we dont, really handy to have a LB who doesnt defend.
I almost settled on the same idea along last spring till season end -credit's where credit's due to merit - but defensive wise, the Gael of this season so for is little short to an embarrassment: make no mistake, what he made in order to concede the 2nd (saying it with no intention to crucify a Lad of Ours) on Tuesday, is something that only one coach could fix: the Holy Spirit!Cocacolajojo wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
I watch quite a lot of it & not only do I struggle to find players like DeRossi, I struggle to find players in any position who would greatly improve City's squad. There are lots of 'maybe's but only a handful of definites & those are either unattainable or very very expensive. Most of the players who play a decent game or two v City, get threads on the net with scores of City fans saying 'sign him' but when you watch most of them, they are not doing better in their own leagues than the player they would replace at City is already doing, for City, in the Prem.
The absolute definite, 100% nailed on certainty to improve our squad was Hazard imo. With us, he would be twice the player he is at Chelsea already.
But IF DeRossi is fit enough, I recon he's as close to a 100% certainty to be a success at City as you could possibly get.
Hazard is great isn't he. I mean we still have to wait and see if he develops even further. However... His decision making and football intelligence is really excellent considering he's what, 12 (21). Most players at that age are naive in comparison.
Stop being "cheap", Pal.
Our Teddy, after having taught for almost a whole Academic Year, what actually we did have need to progress, decided that the preservation of the Sacred Image of "the most effective pub-football's Sporting Director of all times" comes ahead everything else, and accordingly he withdrew that chapter from His predicament of the present Academic Year.
Like every Erudite, though, he still knows.
Same knew another football connoisseur, the MCFC manager, who in fact agreed with Owner and Chairman to purchase Hazard and De Rossi: unfortunately something went wrong, but nobody is allowed to claim what [there is no evidence, They said!]
We know what went wrong; they refused to sell DeRossi. It was mentioned at their board meeting recently & has been repeated again, so it is now public knowledge. No amount of made up, bullshit stories can change that. It is possible that they will decide to sell him now, as they are struggling & he is apparently pissed off with it all.
It is also possible that the Spaniards will refuse to let Mancini buy him, as they have much more power than the previous bloke.
Has he not said NO twice. Will our S.D also need convincing, and why he is the only player Bobby wants, For me get Bale, A cheeky bid for Gerrard would be nothing to lose.
Hazy2 wrote:Gerrard, 18 months 2 yrs would be asked to play his game not that of 3 players, take him out of the dippers and they would be in free fall.
Ted Hughes wrote:From what their board have said recently, it's the club who have turned us down not DeRossi. I recon we have bid what we think he's worth & they were after more & trying to take the piss. Now I think they're having 2nd thoughts & need the money.
Gerrard looks to me as if he still thinks he's 21. Unlike Scholes, who learned to use his brains, Gerrard is still trying to pull stunts all the time. If he did learn to play with intelligence, I think he could go on for years but, like Beckham, he's a bit thick.
Can't see us getting Bale; too expensive. If we wouldn't pay over the odds for Hazard, we won't do for him.
Ted Hughes wrote:From what their board have said recently, it's the club who have turned us down not DeRossi. I recon we have bid what we think he's worth & they were after more & trying to take the piss. Now I think they're having 2nd thoughts & need the money.
Gerrard looks to me as if he still thinks he's 21. Unlike Scholes, who learned to use his brains, Gerrard is still trying to pull stunts all the time. If he did learn to play with intelligence, I think he could go on for years but, like Beckham, he's a bit thick.
Can't see us getting Bale; too expensive. If we wouldn't pay over the odds for Hazard, we won't do for him.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:From what their board have said recently, it's the club who have turned us down not DeRossi. I recon we have bid what we think he's worth & they were after more & trying to take the piss. Now I think they're having 2nd thoughts & need the money.
Gerrard looks to me as if he still thinks he's 21. Unlike Scholes, who learned to use his brains, Gerrard is still trying to pull stunts all the time. If he did learn to play with intelligence, I think he could go on for years but, like Beckham, he's a bit thick.
Can't see us getting Bale; too expensive. If we wouldn't pay over the odds for Hazard, we won't do for him.
We should have payed over the odds for Hazard....and what the fuck is classed over the odds anyway..5 mill? 8 mill?....would have been worth it instead of shelling out for the likes of sinclair.
Not surpirsed Mancini was/is fucked off with Marwood.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:From what their board have said recently, it's the club who have turned us down not DeRossi. I recon we have bid what we think he's worth & they were after more & trying to take the piss. Now I think they're having 2nd thoughts & need the money.
Gerrard looks to me as if he still thinks he's 21. Unlike Scholes, who learned to use his brains, Gerrard is still trying to pull stunts all the time. If he did learn to play with intelligence, I think he could go on for years but, like Beckham, he's a bit thick.
Can't see us getting Bale; too expensive. If we wouldn't pay over the odds for Hazard, we won't do for him.
We should have payed over the odds for Hazard....and what the fuck is classed over the odds anyway..5 mill? 8 mill?....would have been worth it instead of shelling out for the likes of sinclair.
Not surpirsed Mancini was/is fucked off with Marwood.
Green & Blue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:From what their board have said recently, it's the club who have turned us down not DeRossi. I recon we have bid what we think he's worth & they were after more & trying to take the piss. Now I think they're having 2nd thoughts & need the money.
Gerrard looks to me as if he still thinks he's 21. Unlike Scholes, who learned to use his brains, Gerrard is still trying to pull stunts all the time. If he did learn to play with intelligence, I think he could go on for years but, like Beckham, he's a bit thick.
Can't see us getting Bale; too expensive. If we wouldn't pay over the odds for Hazard, we won't do for him.
We should have payed over the odds for Hazard....and what the fuck is classed over the odds anyway..5 mill? 8 mill?....would have been worth it instead of shelling out for the likes of sinclair.
Not surpirsed Mancini was/is fucked off with Marwood.
Exactly we have paid over the odds for many a donkey so why not for Hazard, big big mistake on Citys behalf.
Ted Hughes wrote:Green & Blue wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:From what their board have said recently, it's the club who have turned us down not DeRossi. I recon we have bid what we think he's worth & they were after more & trying to take the piss. Now I think they're having 2nd thoughts & need the money.
Gerrard looks to me as if he still thinks he's 21. Unlike Scholes, who learned to use his brains, Gerrard is still trying to pull stunts all the time. If he did learn to play with intelligence, I think he could go on for years but, like Beckham, he's a bit thick.
Can't see us getting Bale; too expensive. If we wouldn't pay over the odds for Hazard, we won't do for him.
We should have payed over the odds for Hazard....and what the fuck is classed over the odds anyway..5 mill? 8 mill?....would have been worth it instead of shelling out for the likes of sinclair.
Not surpirsed Mancini was/is fucked off with Marwood.
Exactly we have paid over the odds for many a donkey so why not for Hazard, big big mistake on Citys behalf.
Who have we paid over the odds for ?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: C & C, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 89 guests