johnny crossan wrote:With respect friend, that is not the point. Their contribution as home grown first team players at an elite club is what mattersBluemoon4610 wrote:johnny crossan wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:johnny crossan wrote:It doesn't take much brain cranking to work out that the Chavs and all the other clubs at the top of the league are streets ahead of us in producing players for their own first team.
Of the 15 Chelsea players to have made their debuts since Conte took the helm at the start of 2016/17, only 5 are currently at the club. In the same time period, we've given debuts to 15, as well, but 8 are currently with us.
but those five are regulars for the Chavs - Mount, Abraham, James, Hudson Odoi & Christiansen with Gilmour waiting in the wings - already 18 first team appearances so far. That is the point BiB (tedious though it is to have to keep making it)
But which of those 5/6 would get anywhere near our 1st team squad? And who would they replace?
Abrahams - 80 apps
Mount - 89 apps
Christensen - 115 apps
James – 65 apps
Hudson Odoi – 89 apps
IMHO that's exactly the point. To get in our 1st team squad, let alone 1st 11, you need to be world class. Not many academy players are that advanced (though I will concede a select few are), no matter what club they're at. One look at the current PL table is enough to show me that home grown isn't always the way to go. As other posters have said, our owners are very astute businessmen, they wouldn't be investing they sums the do in the CFA if it wasn't making a healthy profit. Nuggets like Phil are the cherry on the icing on the cake (and save us a good few million, to boot!)