PrezIke wrote:
So who then is accountable for this behaviour? "Oh sorry, there are too many workers to monitor we can't keep track of what's going on." That's a piss poor way to justify anything from a managerial standpoint, but especially given the consequences here. If the Qataris, as you say, are pressuring the contractors to get the job done then that right there is therefore a root cause of the problem. Through that behaviour the Qataris are then directly responsible for pressuring contractors to make labourors work long hours and in dangerous conditions (heat) and probably turn a blind eye to what is happening because they know they can get away with it. Why? The lack of political power, in particular, that these migrant workers -- desperate enough to travel thousands of miles for a job that does not even pay well -- in a country that is far from democratic have to protect themselves.
Yes, there is a wider problem of migrant workers in other Arab nations (I've seen and know of it in Jordan, for example with workers from Sri Lanka) and elsewhere (I've seen it in Taiwan with Phillipino migrant workers) where they are practically, or really treated like slaves. This is a global problem.
Whether it pays well is subjective. It seems there is some sort of expectation that Indians should be paid a European wage, why? $300-500 a month is enough to support themselves and an extended family in their home country, so why on earth would (or for that matter should) companies pay more than the market rate. In terms of conditions, when under their direct supervision on site, conditions are no worse than a European construction site. In fact most companies have this week moved to summer working hours which reduces the working day from 8 to 6 hours, so the argument of 12 hour days in 50 degree heat is bollocks, it's a media myth that is simply not true.
The Qatari government are putting no more pressure on the contractors than any client does, they want the job done, on time, on budget and in line with the labor law (which has better provisions for employee welfare in construction than British law), and like I said, they pay very, very well within that budget. The issue is down to the subcontractors behaviour, and the impossibility of enforcing sanctions on the subcontractors which have influential Qatari sponsors.
It kinda goes like this, main contractor goes to the govt with a complaint, government are genuinely concerned, but then the complaint gets held up in all manner of red tape for some 'unknown' reason, which everyone knows is due to the Qatari sponsor of the subcontractor using influence to delay proceedings. Unfortunately, it's personal interest interfering in the resolution of issues.
What the main contractors should do, is simply down tools and walk off the jobs, but the contracts make it impossible to do so - I can't speak for the European companies in Qatar, but I know of two British companies at least, who wish they had never bothered.