Hazy2 wrote:nottsblue wrote:Mase wrote:Outcast wrote:https://www.mailplus.co.uk/edition/comment/143966/manchester-city-should-never-have-made-the-men-horribly-abused-as-boys-by-barry-bennell-face-this-malevolent-predator-in-court
Wtf!! should the current owners be accountable for past ownership mishap?
I feel for the victims, however this cunt is using their misfortune to bash city. Just when you thought this cunt can't sink any lower
The victims knew it was a possibility they’d have to see the horrible cunt, so it’s on them for trying to make money from a rich club just because we once employed someone. The whole thing makes no sense and I’m not sure why it even went to court as he wasn’t employed by City during the period they were abused.
They saw a potential payout and saw the pound signs. Most probably egged on by the solicitors and other hangers on, also sniffing a payday. They got what they deserved, which was nothing
They were after a payday. Out of court £ would have been a win. Disgusting what happened, however they should be ashamed of themselves.
Just about sums it up. Yes terrible things happened and the kiddy fiddler is banged up and hopefully getting a few pastings but his actions are not on us and the solicitors knew this and were chancing their arms on us caving to avoid a publicity scandal which we rightly did not do so yes, shame on the law firms