BlueinBosnia wrote:With everyone starting their own Ade thread over the past couple of days, I've decided I may as well join in.
Some people say we'll be able to appeal, thus allowing him to be able to play for definite on sunday. Others seem to ignore this. I haven't seen an argument yet that would seem to indicate we are not able to appeal, but plenty of people appear to not think we have a hope.
So, can we appeal, and what are the likelihoods of this (bearing in mind there are 2 separate charcges) allowing him to play on sunday?
Thanks.
ronk wrote:There's a new fast track system. Adebayor is the first notable case through it.
The van Persie thing should be dealt with, including appeal, in time for the derby.
Nothing will happen before the derby in the goal celebration case. September 30th IIRC is the next date when anything happens.
BlueinBosnia wrote:ronk wrote:There's a new fast track system. Adebayor is the first notable case through it.
The van Persie thing should be dealt with, including appeal, in time for the derby.
Nothing will happen before the derby in the goal celebration case. September 30th IIRC is the next date when anything happens.
Thanks for that. Is the reason for the disparity in dates between the two charges something to do with police involvement, different panels, or something else, do you know?
sweenyuk wrote:both charges should be the easiest ever to appeal. The celebration he got booked for, so was seen and dealt with on the day. The stamp resulted in a free kick to arse, you don't normally commit a foul when you already have the ball, so free kick could not have been for a badly timed tackle, so again was dealt with during the game. Why is RVP 2 footrd tackle not being investigated..???
Dameerto wrote:The referee actually waves play on during the Ade/VP incident, after staring intently the whole time at the thing he claims not to have seen.
Original Dub wrote:I've a feeling there's a damn good reason why Hughes came out with that statement today about the fact that Clattenburg clearly saw the incident.
It sets it up for an appeal and I'll be suprised if they don't do just that.
I keep saying it, but if a case that relies heavily on a false statement (that can be proven to be just that) cannot be thrown out by order of a top legal team then there is no justice within this system.
BmoreBlue wrote:Original Dub wrote:I've a feeling there's a damn good reason why Hughes came out with that statement today about the fact that Clattenburg clearly saw the incident.
It sets it up for an appeal and I'll be suprised if they don't do just that.
I keep saying it, but if a case that relies heavily on a false statement (that can be proven to be just that) cannot be thrown out by order of a top legal team then there is no justice within this system.
do you have a link to where Hughes said this?
Blueboylewis wrote:Sorry i have not read through these posts. But as it stands Ade can not play in the derby can he? And also If we appeal tommorow will it be dealt with by Sunday?
Cheers
BlueinBosnia wrote:Blueboylewis wrote:Sorry i have not read through these posts. But as it stands Ade can not play in the derby can he? And also If we appeal tommorow will it be dealt with by Sunday?
Cheers
No. As it stands, Ade can play in the Derby unless found guilty of the charges put against him by the FA.
However, City can then appeal against a guilty verdict. What we are trying to clarify is whether an appeal will be over before the Derby. If not, he will be able to play. If we appeal, and the verdict is not overturned, he is banned from the time the appeal is over. However, if we succesfully appeal, there is no ban whatsoever, or it is reduced.
The Man In Blue wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:Blueboylewis wrote:Sorry i have not read through these posts. But as it stands Ade can not play in the derby can he? And also If we appeal tommorow will it be dealt with by Sunday?
Cheers
No. As it stands, Ade can play in the Derby unless found guilty of the charges put against him by the FA.
However, City can then appeal against a guilty verdict. What we are trying to clarify is whether an appeal will be over before the Derby. If not, he will be able to play. If we appeal, and the verdict is not overturned, he is banned from the time the appeal is over. However, if we succesfully appeal, there is no ban whatsoever, or it is reduced.
there is also the possibility that if we appeal and fail, the ban could be increased.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: belleebee, blues2win, carolina-blue, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, patrickblue, stupot and 386 guests