The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Fish111 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:34 am

From the Guardian:

Sir Alex Ferguson likes to boast that his Manchester United team score more late goals than any other side in the world. Others argue that they get a bit of extra help from referees. It has now emerged that the Premier League champions do, as suspected, benefit from an imbalance in the amount of stoppage time that is added to their matches.

After the controversy over Michael Owen's winning goal in Sunday's Manchester derby, the Guardian has looked at all of United's league matches at Old Trafford since the start of the 2006-07 season and discovered that, on average, there has been over a minute extra added by referees when United do not have the lead after 90 minutes, compared to when they are in front. In 48 games when United were ahead, the average amount of stoppage time was 191.35 seconds. In 12 matches when United were drawing or losing there was an average of 257.17sec.

The average stoppage time added at Old Trafford in the period in question is below that given at Anfield, the Emirates Stadium and Stamford Bridge. United's is 205 seconds, compared to Liverpool's 210sec, Arsenal's 224sec and Chelsea's 229sec. But there is also evidence to support the suspicions of many managers, players and supporters that United get preferential treatment at home. When Owen made it 4-3 on Sunday the game was five minutes and 26 seconds into stoppage time. In total, the referee, Martin Atkinson, allowed almost seven minutes, even though the fourth official had signalled a minimum of four. Mark Hughes, the City manager, spoke of feeling "robbed". His sense of grievance will not be helped if he analyses the last three seasons.

In 2006-07, for example, United were winning 15 times on entering stoppage time and referees added an average 194.53sec. In the four games when United were not winning there was an average of 217.25sec. The following year the disparity was greater, Opta's figures showing an average 178.29sec added when United were winning and 254.5sec when they were not. Last season it was 187.71sec compared to 258.6sec.

The pattern has continued in the first three games of the season. In the two games United have led they have played an average 304sec of injury time. On Sunday, Atkinson allowed the game to go on for 415sec.
User avatar
Fish111
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3999
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:09 pm
Supporter of: The Citizens
My favourite player is: Bell & Silva

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby mcfc1632 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:59 am

This issue also flushed some proof over the bias of SKY towards the scum

They were pushing out 'facts' that this concern that the scum get extra time is unfounded - demonstrating that in fact less 'extra time' is played at the swamp than anywhere else

Now they might think that the average viewer is thick - but I suspect that I am not the only one to see straight through it - of course they are using every game - not when the scum are not in front.

So put together this proves that the scum benefit both ways - the ref blows early when they are in front and adds extra when they are not!!
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby david yearsley » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:06 am

And people say it´s all conspiracy bollox - the fact is the refs know what Baconface is like and they ARE intimidated by his touchline antics and constant cajouling of the 4th official. They know their future as prem refs could be jeapordised by incurring the chagrin of the almighty one .Anyone who says Ferguscum doesn´t hold sway at the F.A and P.L. really does have his head up his own sphincter - most refs are very aware of this.
Can you imagine had WE scored after 96 mins? Atkinson would now be a dead man walking - end of
The world is your oyster but your future´s a clam
User avatar
david yearsley
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:19 am
Location: alicante, españa

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Vhero » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:10 am

david yearsley wrote:And people say it´s all conspiracy bollox - the fact is the refs know what Baconface is like and they ARE intimidated by his touchline antics and constant cajouling of the 4th official. They know their future as prem refs could be jeapordised by incurring the chagrin of the almighty one .Anyone who says Ferguscum doesn´t hold sway at the F.A and P.L. really does have his head up his own sphincter - most refs are very aware of this.
Can you imagine had WE scored after 96 mins? Atkinson would now be a dead man walking - end of

I agree the guy would be working in the championship for the rest of his career.
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby david yearsley » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:25 am

For "Championship" re "Unibond" !
The world is your oyster but your future´s a clam
User avatar
david yearsley
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:19 am
Location: alicante, españa

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Guy Debord » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:21 am

Referees make mistakes. We can accept that, but they must be unbiased.

This article is clear proof of bias in favour of the home team at Old Trafford. That bias results in points won for the home team and enables them to proper in the league and consequently to benefit financially.

For the FA to retain any credibilty it needs to review all aspects of refereeing in games involving United, and the big teams in general, to ensure that we are all playing the same game. If we're not, the competition is valueless.
User avatar
Guy Debord
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:22 am
Location: Hulme, Manchester
Supporter of: Columma Durruti

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Fidel Castro » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:32 am

The sooner that alcoholic paedo cunt Fergiescum dies, the better.
User avatar
Fidel Castro
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11909
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: Amersfoort, Cheeseland
Supporter of: City

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 am

david yearsley wrote:Can you imagine had WE scored after 96 mins? Atkinson would now be a dead man walking - end of

That's a bit of a Dream isn't it Dave! If we or any other team were anywhere near their half into injury time, the ref would most certainly pull the play back and give them a freekick/penalty. Tevez' getting a freekick against him in the 94th minute was a prime example, or am I being bitter and cynical? Let's face it, if Owen had tripped over an extraordinary long blade of grass, he would've almost certainly got a penalty and the nearest player to him would've got sent off!

Is it any wonder why some of our players get eat-up and frustrated on the pitch when things like this happen?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46392
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby ronk » Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:44 am

It's a pyrrhic victory for the rags.

They're celebrating more because they deserved it less. Their extra time trick was only worthwhile when it was a mere rumour. Now, it's notorious, Bacon Face can celebrate a great example of it helping save the day but they've also drawn a lot of attention to it.

Next time you can be damn sure the ref will blow the whistle on time. This was worth more to them when they could use it regularly.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby john68 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:39 pm

I really wish I had your faith Ronk. I don't agree. Football, as with other sports will continue to do its own thing, in full public view with utter contempt for the fans.
It happens weekly in rugby league and even when slo-mo videos of tries etc are shown on the big screen, they give the descision that suits them.
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14629
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Robinho_Is_GOD » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:43 pm

david yearsley wrote:And people say it´s all conspiracy bollox - the fact is the refs know what Baconface is like and they ARE intimidated by his touchline antics and constant cajouling of the 4th official. They know their future as prem refs could be jeapordised by incurring the chagrin of the almighty one .Anyone who says Ferguscum doesn´t hold sway at the F.A and P.L. really does have his head up his own sphincter - most refs are very aware of this.
Can you imagine had WE scored after 96 mins? Atkinson would now be a dead man walking - end of


Not a chance Dave, we would have gone on all night and day after until united got the lead back, and then the whistle would have blown, our players obviously realised this, and just thought they might as well get it over with, as they promised their wives and children they would meet them later that night.
User avatar
Robinho_Is_GOD
pot noodle style supporter
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:40 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Robinho

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Robinho_Is_GOD » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:46 pm

ronk wrote:Next time you can be damn sure the ref will blow the whistle on time. This was worth more to them when they could use it regularly.


I have a feeling that if City get that Atkinson twat as ref again this season, then we might accompany his "time added on" with a chorus of "ARE YOU FUCKING SURE THIS TIME"
User avatar
Robinho_Is_GOD
pot noodle style supporter
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:40 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Robinho

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Slim » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:49 pm

I am absolutely gutted about this guys, but WE HAVE TO GET OVER IT.

If we dwell on being the victim then we will lose focus on the bigger picture, cementing a top 4 place and winning the league (and both cups). Have your bitchin, it's probably fitting, but come Wednesday we are done and it's Fulham.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30343
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby ronk » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:57 pm

john68 wrote:I really wish I had your faith Ronk. I don't agree. Football, as with other sports will continue to do its own thing, in full public view with utter contempt for the fans.
It happens weekly in rugby league and even when slo-mo videos of tries etc are shown on the big screen, they give the descision that suits them.


Football is as bent as an s-hook. We both know that and that it has been for a long time. The powers that be know that they won't fool some fans very often, but as long as the majority are happy then they'll keep coming back. You just think it's full public view because it's more obvious to you than the usual clueless fan.

That limits their brazenness. If they go too far then the naive fans who miss all the little things will realise and will be more tuned to future transgressions. Part of cheating is changing the rules and the way you cheat to use more effective strategies.

Future instances of extra long extra time will be scrutinized closely and commentators worldwide will pick up on it sooner when it happens again. At that point it goes out of the control of the cosy cartel of sports journalists who revel in the power they've been given and since they can't stop it from becoming a story, they use it.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Robinho_Is_GOD » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:17 pm

Slim wrote:I am absolutely gutted about this guys, but WE HAVE TO GET OVER IT.

If we dwell on being the victim then we will lose focus on the bigger picture, cementing a top 4 place and winning the league (and both cups). Have your bitchin, it's probably fitting, but come Wednesday we are done and it's Fulham.


True, but it isn't Wednesday until tomorrow, and I have a lot to get out of my system Slim.
User avatar
Robinho_Is_GOD
pot noodle style supporter
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:40 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Robinho

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby robinho1025 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:25 pm

IMO we mostly have ourselves to blame for losing on sunday. In the last 30 seconds, Tevez gives up a free kick then he heads the ball to a U****d player when he could have headed it down and booted it. Then Ireland comes running in from f**k knows where just in time to see the ball passed to a wide open Owen who no one has marked. We really were just standing around and I don't care how many extra seconds were allotted, YOU PLAY UNTIL THE FINAL WHISTLE. And we did not.
robinho1025
Carlo Nash's Debut
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:18 pm
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Robinho

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby david yearsley » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:43 pm

[quote]Not a chance Dave, we would have gone on all night and day after until U***d got the lead back, and then the whistle would have blown, our players obviously realised this, and just thought they might as well get it over with, as they promised their wives and children they would meet them later that night

and
That's a bit of a Dream isn't it Dave! If we or any other team were anywhere near their half into injury time, the ref would most certainly pull the play back and give them a freekick/penalty. Tevez' getting a freekick against him in the 94th minute was a prime example, or am I being bitter and cynical? Let's face it, if Owen had tripped over an extraordinary long blade of grass, he would've almost certainly got a penalty and the nearest player to him would've got sent off![quote]

Derrrr.. how could I ever have been so dumb!;)
The world is your oyster but your future´s a clam
User avatar
david yearsley
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3739
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:19 am
Location: alicante, españa

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:51 pm

david yearsley wrote:
Not a chance Dave, we would have gone on all night and day after until U***d got the lead back, and then the whistle would have blown, our players obviously realised this, and just thought they might as well get it over with, as they promised their wives and children they would meet them later that night

and
That's a bit of a Dream isn't it Dave! If we or any other team were anywhere near their half into injury time, the ref would most certainly pull the play back and give them a freekick/penalty. Tevez' getting a freekick against him in the 94th minute was a prime example, or am I being bitter and cynical? Let's face it, if Owen had tripped over an extraordinary long blade of grass, he would've almost certainly got a penalty and the nearest player to him would've got sent off!

Derrrr.. how could I ever have been so dumb!;)

Ha ha ha, you know it ;-)
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46392
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby shawzy » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:35 pm

robinho1025 wrote:IMO we mostly have ourselves to blame for losing on sunday. In the last 30 seconds, Tevez gives up a free kick then he heads the ball to a U****d player when he could have headed it down and booted it. Then Ireland comes running in from f**k knows where just in time to see the ball passed to a wide open Owen who no one has marked. We really were just standing around and I don't care how many extra seconds were allotted, YOU PLAY UNTIL THE FINAL WHISTLE. And we did not.


Yes its all our fault we lost..I am annoyed about the biased added time but im not goin to bitch about it...The game was lost far before that and we need to defend as a unit better.Fletcher had 2 identical headed goals and we just left him unmarked.The clunt hardly ever score goals and we just left him 2 it.No excuses.
Image
User avatar
shawzy
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4619
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:22 pm
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Marc-Vivien Foé

Re: The Proof: Not That We Needed Any!

Postby Bloke » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:45 pm

Sky Sports Breaking News: Giggs has just scored to make it 5-3
Bloke
Sun Jihai's Vacant Smile
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:33 pm


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, branny, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, mr_nool, stupot and 228 guests