An open letter to The Sun
The Sun journalist Steven Howard receives an open letter from mancityblues.com member "Bluesky" following his statements this morning, quote;
It's Manu madness
SO a £25,000 fine and suspended two-match ban for Emmanuel Adebayor.
In other words, he's as good as got off for effectively doing his best to incite a riot against former club Arsenal. What sort of message is this from the FA?
And yet Carlos Tevez is criticised on numerous radio phone-ins for his low-key celebrations against West Ham. No wonder players are confused.
Dear Mr. Howard
Oh the irony! On the day Manchester City announce that for the second time in the last couple of months the Sun has been forced to apologise for publishing lies about the club, your newspaper's anti-Manchester City agenda rears its ugly head once again with the astonishing claim that Emmanuel Adebayor "got off" with a £25,000 fine and a suspended two match ban for his goal celebration against Arsenal.
I know this goes against the grain for the Sun but let's look at the facts.
1) Adebayor did not abuse the Arsenal fans.
2) At no time did he leave the field of play.
3) He didn't engage in any badge tugging or badge kissing.
4) He had to put up with all manner of racial and personal abuse from the warm up to the end of the game.
5) The Arsenal fans "got off" with trying to enter the field of play, throwing coins and other objects, including at least one banana, at Adebayor and assaulting a steward.
6) He was shown a yellow card, apparently for his celebration, but because the F.A. would have been powerless to charge him for this incident referee Mark Clattenburg later said that it was for "timewasting" not for the celebration.
7) The time elapsed between the ball hitting the back of the net and Clattenburg issuing the yellow card for "timewasting" was 30 seconds. Hardly timewasting by anybody's definition. Few goal celebrations involve a shorter period of time.
In addition, and yet again, the F.A. has shown itself up with inconsistencies and different treatment for different clubs.
In the same game game Robin van Persie scored an equaliser at the Arsenal end. Instead of running a few yards to celebrate in front of them he veered off to the other side to do so in front of the City fans. In doing so he left the field of play and screamed obscenities at the City fans in an area where many children sit. Result? No yellow card and just a letter from the F.A. reminding him of players' responsibilities.
Also worth noting is that the City fans were very restrained in the face of such foul mouthed abuse and, unlike the Arsenal fans, didn't attempt to riot.
All of 3 years ago Gary Neville ran the length of the pitch to celebrate a goal (not even scored by himself) in front of Liverpool fans. He yelled abuse at them and tugged at his badge. Result? A £5,000 fine and a warning as to his future conduct.
Cue the Manchester derby less than two weeks ago and when the winning goal was scored Neville, without any authorisation from the officials, entered the field of play then ran half the length of the pitch to taunt the City fans. Result? Despite previous for this sort of thing the F.A. are to take no action.
Again, the City fans restrained themselves and didn't attempt to riot.
So it looks like both van Persie and Neville "got off" with it whereas Adebayor is treated differently with a fine and a suspended two match ban.
Apart from the double standards, the F.A. have made a rod for their own backs with this decision. They have set a precedent that action will only be taken against players overcelebrating goals if the opposing fans attempt to invade the pitch and cause a riot. What sort of message does this send to potential hooligans? Millwall must be studying this case carefully in view of the recent F.A charges against them.
It should also be borne in mind that F.A. chief executive Ian Watmore is a self-confessed Arsenal fan who made totally inappropriate public comments about the two incidents involving Adebayor in the Arsenal game that undoubtedly prejudiced and pre-judged both of Adebayor's cases.
In addition, Manchester United chief exective David Gill is also a member of the F.A.'s board of management. It would be to his club's advantage if Adebayor missed the upcoming derby and guess what? Adebayor's 'stamping' case was fast tracked so that he did miss the derby. And guess what again? As well as the Neville incident in the derby, the F.A. are taking no action against Manchester United for the incident when City substitute Javier Garrido was struck by a coin thrown from the crowd.
Before you or your newspaper publish any more unfounded tosh about Manchester City you would be well advised to bear in mind that the club is fast becoming an unstoppable force in the Premier League despite the F.A.'s and much of the media's best efforts to keep
the cosy 'big 4' intact. The City fans aren't asking for preferential treatment, just consistency and a level playing field. A bit of factual reporting wouldn't go amiss either.
Kind regards
http://mancityblues.com/newsblog/index. ... to-the-sun