Beefymcfc wrote:Due to the controversial comments from Taggart regarding Alan Pie'ly, was just wondering what your thoughts were after his first game back. Criteria is based on fitness and judgement with reasons. So:
Fitness: 8
Judgement: 3
He got around OK and seemed to be always up with play. As for judgement, I thought he had a very poor performance. That should never have been a yellow for Zab, completely missed the penalty claim of Shaun, only booked Wigan players when asked (ie. Zabs) and definately did not take appropriate action against Melchiott (?) when he went through on Carlos!
The Original Special One wrote:Fitness, 5
(he should have been on the spot for 'the penalty that wasn't!)
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The Original Special One wrote:Fitness, 5
(he should have been on the spot for 'the penalty that wasn't!)
He was on the spot but made a decision many disagree with. Could have gone either way and we didnt get the rub.
Original Dub wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The Original Special One wrote:Fitness, 5
(he should have been on the spot for 'the penalty that wasn't!)
He was on the spot but made a decision many disagree with. Could have gone either way and we didnt get the rub.
Hold on I'm not buying this whole thing that it could have went either way. The defender made no contact with ball whatsoever and brought the player down in the box.
The referee was wrong. That's why 'many disagree with him' Doug!! ;)
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Original Dub wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The Original Special One wrote:Fitness, 5
(he should have been on the spot for 'the penalty that wasn't!)
He was on the spot but made a decision many disagree with. Could have gone either way and we didnt get the rub.
Hold on I'm not buying this whole thing that it could have went either way. The defender made no contact with ball whatsoever and brought the player down in the box.
The referee was wrong. That's why 'many disagree with him' Doug!! ;)
lol I am one of those who disagree but I also know I wouldnt have been happy if a pen had been given against us in that situation. I would guess that would be given on about 3 or 4 out of 10 occasions.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I thought his fitness looked fine , no problems at all so an 8.
His judgements seemed pretty good generally. It's par for the course for a fan to disagree with decisions made against his team and I do think the pen should have been given but overall a 7 I would say.
I am not one of those who thinks in black and white as I feel many fans are especially when emotions are runnimng high. One bad/poor decision , whether by a player or referee or manager does not make them useless.
LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:I don't think these discussions help football one bit.
So I give the thread 0
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 714 guests