Blue2 wrote:Its not that we've drawn five games on the bounce that is the problem, its who we have drawn against . Apart from Villa , they are all dross.
Blue2 wrote:Its not that we've drawn five games on the bounce that is the problem, its who we have drawn against . Apart from Villa , they are all dross.
Vhero wrote:Differnce between the scum and us is they already lost their points to chelski which we are still to do before Jan as I honestly can't see us stopping them right now. So add another 3 points to that.
Alex Sapphire wrote:Blue2 wrote:Its not that we've drawn five games on the bounce that is the problem, its who we have drawn against . Apart from Villa , they are all dross.
although Fulham beat us at ours the last 2 seasons and the our recent record at Wigan is W 0 D 1 L 3 F 12 A 6. But they're dross.
Socrates wrote:comparing our results now to our past underachievements isn't a substitute for a proper analysis of where we actually are and where we need to be.
Alex Sapphire wrote:Socrates wrote:comparing our results now to our past underachievements isn't a substitute for a proper analysis of where we actually are and where we need to be.
that's the trouble.
My benchmark for the progress of my team is my team's past performance.
Every time we improve I am happy.
Others seem to have a starting point of the European Champions and everything less is failure and causes misery.
I'd rather be me
carl_feedthegoat wrote:simon12 wrote:As was said in another thread we have some Pot Noodle supporters
AND WE ALSO HAVE FANS THAT WEAR "WE ARE THE WORLD" T SHIRTS AND HOLD HANDS IN A CIRCLE.
Socrates wrote: I'd have to factor changes in the relative strength of our opposition from season to season as well. .
Alex Sapphire wrote:Socrates wrote: I'd have to factor changes in the relative strength of our opposition from season to season as well. .
what formula would you use?
A + B = C
(where A = Manchester City, B = £200 million and C = Barcelona)
or
A = B - C
(where A = Progress, B = City's current performance, C = City's recent past performance)
Socrates wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:Socrates wrote: I'd have to factor changes in the relative strength of our opposition from season to season as well. .
what formula would you use?
A + B = C
(where A = Manchester City, B = £200 million and C = Barcelona)
or
A = B - C
(where A = Progress, B = City's current performance, C = City's recent past performance)
X + Y = Z
(where X = City, B = £200 million and C= 4th)
ENIAM NAM wrote:Socrates wrote:Alex Sapphire wrote:Socrates wrote: I'd have to factor changes in the relative strength of our opposition from season to season as well. .
what formula would you use?
A + B = C
(where A = Manchester City, B = £200 million and C = Barcelona)
or
A = B - C
(where A = Progress, B = City's current performance, C = City's recent past performance)
X + Y = Z
(where X = City, B = £200 million and C= 4th)
What do y & z = ?
Dronny wrote:What is the club's stated aim for this season?
a) Chumps League
b) 5th
c) 6th
What are the fans stated aim for this season?
a) Chumps League
b) 5th
c) 6th
The difference is that the club have only stated that for season 09/10 their aim is to finish in the top 6, forget what some people think the club is aiming for.
Original Dub wrote:How come U***d are still in the title race, yet we're in a crisis? It seems very odd to me.
DoomMerchant wrote:Original Dub wrote:How come U***d are still in the title race, yet we're in a crisis? It seems very odd to me.
U***d aren't in the title race.
cheers
Original Dub wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Original Dub wrote:How come U***d are still in the title race, yet we're in a crisis? It seems very odd to me.
U***d aren't in the title race.
cheers
Silly silly boy. That has to be the stupid post of the day.
Cheers
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: john@staustell, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 306 guests