Lee_Kinda wrote:Pompey?
WTF!!!
Lee_Kinda wrote:Pompey?
WTF!!!
Vhero wrote:Dunno if anybody posted this before but found it and though you guys might want a look. http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadium_menu/past_future/future_stadiums.shtml Scouse reds Stadium looks really nice but the Olympic Stadium is UGLY. Some really good satiums football and none to look at here. I especially like the Barzial ones for the 2014 world cup in the 60-70k bracket.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Vhero wrote:Dunno if anybody posted this before but found it and though you guys might want a look. http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadium_menu/past_future/future_stadiums.shtml Scouse reds Stadium looks really nice but the Olympic Stadium is UGLY. Some really good satiums football and none to look at here. I especially like the Barzial ones for the 2014 world cup in the 60-70k bracket.
Looking at that from professional point of view, then I can assure you that Stanley Park will look very different from that if actualy build. That is only architects vision. Once engineers count the actual costs, lot of the pointless steel and concrete structures will be scrapped. That is a fact. Unless they get taken over by some filthy rich oil trilliobillionaire who doesn't mind the costs.
Kyle wrote:Thats a really good link Vhero, enjoyed looking at that. I really like Tottenhams, I like the single tier on the ends. And I do agree, the stadiums they have planned for Brasil look really nice.
Moonchesteri wrote:I see that very few of the new stadiums have the pitch close to the field. Spurs' new is one of the only I recall. Not that there's any stupid running tracks there anymore but just like at Eastlands, the pitch is actually surprisingly far away from the stands at some points in the stadium. Why is that? Is it an architectural reason? Easier to build big all round stands when it's like that?
Also, what is it with the Landsdowne Road. Why is there just one tier at the other end when there's three at the other. strange.
mr_nool wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:I see that very few of the new stadiums have the pitch close to the field. Spurs' new is one of the only I recall. Not that there's any stupid running tracks there anymore but just like at Eastlands, the pitch is actually surprisingly far away from the stands at some points in the stadium. Why is that? Is it an architectural reason? Easier to build big all round stands when it's like that?
Also, what is it with the Landsdowne Road. Why is there just one tier at the other end when there's three at the other. strange.
Allrounders will always be further from the pitch than a stadium with open corners. It's quite simple geometry
CityFanFromRome wrote:Speaking of new stadiums, this is the presentation of the new A.S. Roma stadium, entitled to the latest great chairman Franco Sensi, the chairman of the last Italian title won, who died of illness in August 2008:
[youtube]ZQFhBchYavY[/youtube]
The project is still in its embrional stage due to the bad financial situation of the club, so I don't know if it will ever get done, but it looks great imho.
Moonchesteri wrote:mr_nool wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:I see that very few of the new stadiums have the pitch close to the field. Spurs' new is one of the only I recall. Not that there's any stupid running tracks there anymore but just like at Eastlands, the pitch is actually surprisingly far away from the stands at some points in the stadium. Why is that? Is it an architectural reason? Easier to build big all round stands when it's like that?
Also, what is it with the Landsdowne Road. Why is there just one tier at the other end when there's three at the other. strange.
Allrounders will always be further from the pitch than a stadium with open corners. It's quite simple geometry
Yes of course. I actually meant comparison between stadiums like ours and like Spurs' new where is no open corners yet all the stands are very close to the pitch.
http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadium_menu/past_future/pictures/future_stadiums/london_white.shtml
mr_nool wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:mr_nool wrote:Moonchesteri wrote:I see that very few of the new stadiums have the pitch close to the pitch. Spurs' new is one of the only I recall. Not that there's any stupid running tracks there anymore but just like at Eastlands, the pitch is actually surprisingly far away from the stands at some points in the stadium. Why is that? Is it an architectural reason? Easier to build big all round stands when it's like that?
Also, what is it with the Landsdowne Road. Why is there just one tier at the other end when there's three at the other. strange.
Allrounders will always be further from the pitch than a stadium with open corners. It's quite simple geometry
Yes of course. I actually meant comparison between stadiums like ours and like Spurs' new where is no open corners yet all the stands are very close to the pitch.
http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadium_menu/past_future/pictures/future_stadiums/london_white.shtml
But there stadium isn't really round (only on the outside). It's more like this:
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: blues2win, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, ruralblue, steelsnail, zuricity and 549 guests