would it be so bad for liverpool if he HAD gone to them

[ashton287]

probably bullshit anyway but got me wondering

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 58,00.html


If the story is true and liverpool had sacked rafa, would there be such a big fuss about it all and would mancini be being hailed as a saviour for a club in trouble instead of a dodgy usurper. i dont beleive the whole issue is THE WAY we did it because how else was it going to be done. hughes wasnt getting the job done so he got sacked SIMPLEZZ would of made no sense to sack him before the game cos it would have affected the team and would have given mancini less time if they waited a few days

[feedthegreek]

no there would,nt have been anything said at all.
despite rafa winning champions league fa cup and appearing in another champion league final.
the press look at city as upstarts as if city could ever win anything god forbid.
but they are in for a rude awakening cos these owners of ours wont settle for second best.
the sacking of hughes is the first real sign they mean buisness.
theres a guy called neil ashton just been on talksport notw journo
he reckons if mancini doesnt get city in the top 4
that they will go all out for mourinho in the summer.
he also said when ferguson said we had a small club mentality, he was
way off the mark, city are the most ambitious club in the prem.

[irblinx]

Just another example of "please Mr Cook, shut the feck up!"