In the red - Big style

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

In the red - Big style

Postby blues-clues » Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:56 pm

Interesting article in the Times Business Pages today but no mention of it in the sport section.

The Trafford Borough team seem to have considerable problems financing their debts.

They are looking for £600m from a bond sale but that wont cover the PIK debts guaranteed by the Glazers of £140m that have already increased by £40m.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 973929.ece

Basically all their operating profits are consumed paying off the interest leaving no excess to reduce the capital balance. It seems they paid £790m for the club and still owe at least £700m five years after taking over. If I was in the position of a bank with all the dodgy debts out there would I really be looking to lend them more money?

They earn about £70m from qualifying for the final stages of the CL. So if for some reason they failed to qualify they would have to reduce their costs or would not be able to meet their interest payments....
User avatar
blues-clues
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:57 pm
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Joe Corrigan

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:59 pm

thanks malcolm.

Image
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby 10.Goater_Legend » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:06 pm

Ohh dear, couldn't happen to a nicer club ;)
User avatar
10.Goater_Legend
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:21 am
Supporter of: City

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:10 pm

If the club’s financial performance deteriorates below a certain level then the hedge funds have the right to appoint their own directors to the board.


translates as "Fire Sale"
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby Vhero » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:12 pm

That Pik debt is a bitch they need to get that sorted I have a feeling those cunts will land on their feet though. Although I really hope they go bust. I mean all that history would mean shit then wouldn't it?
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:13 pm

after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28910
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:15 pm

Wonderwall wrote:after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?


from what i can understand from the article, they have been paying off some debts whilst others are piling up:

The so-called payment in kind (Pik) notes borrowed from Perry Capital and Citadel, two American hedge funds, initially stood at £138m in 2006, but have since accrued £40m of unpaid interest.
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby OliverHardy » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:44 pm

if this was a financial problem of this magnitude relating to most other teams (certainly us) it would be back page news today for sure.
OliverHardy
Horlock's Aggressive Walk
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:31 am

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby ronk » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:47 pm

OliverHardy wrote:if this was a financial problem of this magnitude relating to most other teams (certainly us) it would be back page news today for sure.


It's not exactly a surprise though. This is common knowledge that they have debts, it was included for background. The news is a bond issue, which belongs in the financial section anyway.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby sandman » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:10 pm

When was the last time they failed to qualify for the champions league?

When was the last home league game that they had 10% of their stadium unsold?

I cant see them struggling financially for too long... Unfortunately!!
User avatar
sandman
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:34 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby psut1 » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:12 pm

Wonderwall wrote:after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?


they paid 790mil but still owe 780mil

They are looking for £600m from a bond sale but that wont cover the PIK debts guaranteed by the Glazers of £140m that have already increased by £40m.

600 + 140 + 40 = 780
They have not been able to pay the interest on the 140 pik debt and that is what will kill them if they are not carefull as it is at 14% which is 19.6 million per year in interest on the 140, they then have to pay interest on the 600mil if that was at 5% (which is low) thats another 30 mil so they are paying 50mill a year in interest. add wages etc and you have a potential problem
"I scored after 19 minutes a "bluemoon" goal - David White picked it up, he saw me standing alone, he crossed and I hammered it home. The moon had turned gold"
(Niall Quinn the autobiography)
psut1
Richard Edghill Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:15 am
Location: Salford
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby psut1 » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:13 pm

Wonderwall wrote:after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?


Lady boy is being paid off as 12 million euros per year for 7 years
"I scored after 19 minutes a "bluemoon" goal - David White picked it up, he saw me standing alone, he crossed and I hammered it home. The moon had turned gold"
(Niall Quinn the autobiography)
psut1
Richard Edghill Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:15 am
Location: Salford
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:28 pm

psut1 wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?


Lady boy is being paid off as 12 million euros per year for 7 years



I thought the big news about the transfer was the fact it was all one payment?
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28910
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:29 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
psut1 wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?


Lady boy is being paid off as 12 million euros per year for 7 years



I thought the big news about the transfer was the fact it was all one payment?


oh, and thanks for the break down, makes it much easier to understand for numpties like me ;-)
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28910
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby ronk » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:36 pm

Wonderwall wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:
psut1 wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:after 5 years they have cleared 90m of debt, that doesnt sound too bad in the circumstances and the fact that they have paid huge amounts for players too.

Is the ladyboy 80m in these figs?


Lady boy is being paid off as 12 million euros per year for 7 years



I thought the big news about the transfer was the fact it was all one payment?


oh, and thanks for the break down, makes it much easier to understand for numpties like me ;-)


Well, I'm still no nearer to understanding the answer to your question.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby jodrellblue » Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:55 pm

Oh Dear!

Going out of the FA Cup costs potential £4M in prize and TV money without match day and merchandise income.

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompeti ... 82009.aspx
jodrellblue
Micah Richard's Penalty Dives
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby blues-clues » Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:03 pm

jodrellblue wrote:Oh Dear!

Going out of the FA Cup costs potential £4M in prize and TV money without match day and merchandise income.

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompeti ... 82009.aspx


Interesting link! The winners of the FA Cup Final, the worlds most famous cup competition, get less than the winner of Wimbledon!
User avatar
blues-clues
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:57 pm
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Joe Corrigan

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby ronk » Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:30 pm

blues-clues wrote:
jodrellblue wrote:Oh Dear!

Going out of the FA Cup costs potential £4M in prize and TV money without match day and merchandise income.

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompeti ... 82009.aspx


Interesting link! The winners of the FA Cup Final, the worlds most famous cup competition, get less than the winner of Wimbledon!


How do you figure that? The winner of the Wimbledon singles got £850,000. Winning just the final nets £1.8m and that's before including the prize money for each round (£3.4m from where we start) and the TV income on the way. It also doesn't include any ticket sales.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby bluej » Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:32 pm

ronk wrote:
blues-clues wrote:
jodrellblue wrote:Oh Dear!

Going out of the FA Cup costs potential £4M in prize and TV money without match day and merchandise income.

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompeti ... 82009.aspx


Interesting link! The winners of the FA Cup Final, the worlds most famous cup competition, get less than the winner of Wimbledon!


How do you figure that? The winner of the Wimbledon singles got £850,000. Winning just the final nets £1.8m and that's before including the prize money for each round (£3.4m from where we start) and the TV income on the way. It also doesn't include any ticket sales.


Unless he means each individual player? Even then their wages would make up for that.
bluej
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:11 am
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: In the red - Big style

Postby blues-clues » Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:37 pm

No. Sorry I fucked up!

I misread the figures on the FA website and only saw the runners up figure, I also didnt realise you get prize money after every round.
User avatar
blues-clues
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:57 pm
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Joe Corrigan

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blues2win, Majestic-12 [Bot], salford city, stupot, TomS and 254 guests