The mancityfans.net football forum

http://www.givemefootball.com/premier-l ... hester-cit

Just saw this. Probably tripe - can't see us ditching him with our lack in defence. Does say 'short term loan'...Thoughts?

no i cant either. we cannot be helping out

any other teams in this division

Especially ones in direct competition with our ambitions you would have thought.

'Reports in The People' are hardly concrete evidence either. Not even 'a source close to the club' gets a mention!

Has to be horseshit.

feedthegreek wrote:no i cant either. we cannot be helping out

any other teams in this division

Such as Birmingham or Everton.

King Kev wrote:

feedthegreek wrote:no i cant either. we cannot be helping out

any other teams in this division

Such as Birmingham or Everton.

Everton?

King Kev wrote:

feedthegreek wrote:no i cant either. we cannot be helping out

any other teams in this division

Such as Birmingham or Everton.

Surely you don't mean Jo?

I would have thought that a hinderance

Mancini has said on the OS that Richards is going nowhere becuase he is talented and we are short of defenders. I can't see how this would not apply to Ned as well.

As for loaning him to Liverpool....it would make no sense at all. Selling him makes no sense but a loan deal would be "madder than Mad Jack McMad, the winner of this year's Mr Madman competition"

IanBishopsHaircut wrote:

King Kev wrote:

feedthegreek wrote:no i cant either. we cannot be helping out

any other teams in this division

Such as Birmingham or Everton.

Surely you don't mean Jo?

I would have thought that a hinderance

Maybe but we didn't know that at the time.

As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

this is probably one of the worst pieces of lazy crappy journalism ever. not worth wrapping your chips in

King Kev wrote:As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

no chance, the only thing that will cost us a top 6 place is playing shit football and getting beat.

no point getting excuses in already.

The Man In Blue wrote:

King Kev wrote:As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

no chance, the only thing that will cost us a top 6 place is playing shit football and getting beat.

no point getting excuses in already.

I hope you're right.

Regardless, lending players to your opposition is fuclin stupid IMO.

King Kev wrote:

The Man In Blue wrote:

King Kev wrote:As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

no chance, the only thing that will cost us a top 6 place is playing shit football and getting beat.

no point getting excuses in already.

I hope you're right.

Regardless, lending players to your opposition is fuclin stupid IMO.

a promoted club with useless player, I thought we were being kind to them and it was a good move for Joe. They are the usual surprise package from the promoted clubs. However, they have 40 million to spend in the summer so who knows.

King Kev wrote:

IanBishopsHaircut wrote:

King Kev wrote:

feedthegreek wrote:no i cant either. we cannot be helping out

any other teams in this division

Such as Birmingham or Everton.

Surely you don't mean Jo?

I would have thought that a hinderance

Maybe but we didn't know that at the time.

As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

not with you here joe hart cant play verus city, so the best he can do is stop other teams scoring against birmingham,
like he did last nght v scum, therefore they drop another 2 points.
win win for us he gets better and better.

King Kev wrote:

The Man In Blue wrote:

King Kev wrote:As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

no chance, the only thing that will cost us a top 6 place is playing shit football and getting beat.

no point getting excuses in already.

I hope you're right.

Regardless, lending players to your opposition is fuclin stupid IMO.

What i'm saying mate is that we are better than Birmingham, Hart or no Hart. If we fail to finish in the top six the fault will lie with our performances on the pitch, not with the teams above us and how they perform.

Edit: On topic i reckon the story is bollocks; Mancio recently said he would not consider selling Richards as we only have four fit defenders, why would he then go and get rid of Ned?

King Kev wrote:

The Man In Blue wrote:

King Kev wrote:As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

no chance, the only thing that will cost us a top 6 place is playing shit football and getting beat.

no point getting excuses in already.

I hope you're right.

Regardless, lending players to your opposition is fuclin stupid IMO.

Considering the options at the beginning of the season - wouldnt you agree lending him to brum appeared the most intelligent?

Patrick wrote:

King Kev wrote:

The Man In Blue wrote:

King Kev wrote:As for lending Hart to Birmingham, well that decision might just cost us a top 6 place.

no chance, the only thing that will cost us a top 6 place is playing shit football and getting beat.

no point getting excuses in already.

I hope you're right.

Regardless, lending players to your opposition is fuclin stupid IMO.

Considering the options at the beginning of the season - wouldnt you agree lending him to brum appeared the most intelligent?

To be honest mate, no.

I rate Hart very highly and, whilst I understand him wanting 1st team football and us not wanting to sell him, I believed then and still believe now that you should never loan a player to a team in the same league as yourselves.

Svensational wrote:I always thought that teams in the same league couldnt loan players to each other anyway?! Or were they the old rules?

They can loan players to teams in the same league but the player isn't allowed to play against his parent club.

I don't believe a word of it. Even sillier that is says as defensive cover for Lpool. What's the point in going as cover, surely the only reason for loaning anyone is so that get guaranteed game time.

As I said elsewhere, we are short of defenders, bound to get rid of the half fit ones we have obviously! Utter b*ll*x

Yeah; assumed it was rubbish. Thought i'd stick it out there just in case.

It would be weird to have a Press job where you get paid to make up ridiculous stories to fill newspaper pages. One one hand it's great luck to have something so easy to do. On the other hand you'd spend your career spouting absolute crap, and knowing it. Can't be good for the soul.