The mancityfans.net football forum

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

london blue 2 wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

There will always be a section of "fans" that want a managers head after a disappointing result. I'm suprised you really needed me to type that.

ashton287 wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

There will always be a section of "fans" that want a managers head after a disappointing result. I'm suprised you really needed me to type that.

Using my keen detective skills i've picked up on the undertone hear and i think it's completely diffrent to our situation, i'm pretty sure if we had the same manager for that amount of time that brought us that amount of success we wouldnt be considering binning him because of a few bad games.

Andy, lincs wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

Oh does he have to. I think he was talking about our last manager who didn't have the support of some fans before a ball was kicked. Now lets not start bickering again, we've a game on tonight! Channel the energies there. ;0)

ashton287 wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

There will always be a section of "fans" that want a managers head after a disappointing result. I'm suprised you really needed me to type that.

Using my keen detective skills i've picked up on the undertone hear and i think it's completely diffrent to our situation, i'm pretty sure if we had the same manager for that amount of time that brought us that amount of success we wouldnt be considering binning him because of a few bad games.

john@staustell wrote:I found myself in the bizarre position of agreeing with most that was said on Sunday Supplement.

About SCUM they said firstly that Baconface would do a lot better if he was allowed to spend and replace players (which he clearly aint). And secondly that he is holding the whole nasty, sad, corrrupt, obnoxious show together, and if he leaves at the end of the season the whole thing will come down like a pack of cards! (I may have added a few adjectives).

So if any of them actually want to sack him, they are proved the most mindless of mindless morons!!

Party on!

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

ashton287 wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

There will always be a section of "fans" that want a managers head after a disappointing result. I'm suprised you really needed me to type that.

Using my keen detective skills i've picked up on the undertone hear and i think it's completely diffrent to our situation, i'm pretty sure if we had the same manager for that amount of time that brought us that amount of success we wouldnt be considering binning him because of a few bad games.

Exactly.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Andy, lincs wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:that's football fans for you, so fickle. We'd be the same mate (not all of us)

Explain.

Oh does he have to. I think he was talking about our last manager who didn't have the support of some fans before a ball was kicked. Now lets not start bickering again, we've a game on tonight! Channel the energies there. ;0)

So he was comparing Hughes to manager who has won eleven Premier League titles, Five FA Cups, Three league cups, Two Champion's League titles, Cup Winners Cup, UEFA Cup, Three Scottish titles, Four Scottish Cups? Very much the same thing.

Ted Hughes wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

ashton287 wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:[quote="Niall Quinns Discopants][/quote]

Explain.[/quote]

There will always be a section of "fans" that want a managers head after a disappointing result. I'm suprised you really needed me to type that.[/quote]

Using my keen detective skills i've picked up on the undertone hear and i think it's completely diffrent to our situation, i'm pretty sure if we had the same manager for that amount of time that brought us that amount of success we wouldnt be considering binning him because of a few bad games.[/quote]

Exactly.[/quote]

Some would. I'm convinced after watching City all these years that a percentage of fans actually enjoy the unrest more than the football.[/quote]

london blue 2 wrote:Why the fuck are people talking about Hughes?

london blue 2 wrote:Why the fuck are people talking about Hughes?

Dazzacity wrote:

london blue 2 wrote:Why the fuck are people talking about Hughes?

Because to me, and obviuosly others, it sounded like you was having some kind of dig towards City fans calling for Hughes head. I cant really see anyother way it can come accross. In reality, you simply cant compare the two.