Page 1 of 2

Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:52 pm
by Fidel Castro

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:56 pm
by lets all have a disco
Yeah,it will be loan if he does go as he has just signed a new long term deal.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:56 pm
by Crossie
Loan would be absolutely perfect.

They are not direct rivals, and he wouldnt be able to play against us. I really hope this happens.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:58 pm
by Blue Blood
Crossie wrote:Loan would be absolutely perfect.

They are not direct rivals, and he wouldnt be able to play against us. I really hope this happens.


Agree completely, sending Vlad out on loan to a prem team to be a starter would be great for both him and city.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:00 pm
by ashton287
fidel you drama queen it even says its a loan move, i thought we'de sold him when i read the title i was ready for a proper rant ha

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:02 pm
by Martinez
A loan would be quite a good move if he wants more action, I feel we are quite well covered on the flanks now Sweeps is back, Petrov is taken out into the light and Mancini seem to use Bellers and Robbie more as out n out wingers.

Ideally for the team would be to keep him, though, I can see him getting quite a few games with us still in all competitions

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:16 pm
by Mike J
if he is to go anywhere then a loan would be good. would love to see him play more games in the prem.

would be a gigantic mistake to actually sell him on though. but as already mentioned he just signed a new deal so hopefully that wont happen.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:17 pm
by Original Dub
Godd move for us, I'm just suprised Liverpool don't go for him, not that we'd loan him out to those cunts...

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:21 pm
by CTID Hants
Crossie wrote:Loan would be absolutely perfect.

They are not direct rivals, and he wouldnt be able to play against us. I really hope this happens
.


I agree it would be good for him to gain more experience in the Prem although i know KK will not agree with them not being direct rivals. (doesn't agree with loaning to anyone in the Prem, but on this occasion i believe it to be perfect, their laegue position, location just up the road.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:28 pm
by avoidconfusion
I just can't see how a shit team of cloggers like Bolton could use a technical wiz kid like Weiss?

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:29 pm
by Original Dub
avoidconfusion wrote:I just can't see how a shit team of cloggers like Bolton could use a technical wiz kid like Weiss?


In fairness, they won't be half as "cloggerish" under Coyle and that's the reaosn they wanted him... it also says coyle wanted Vlad this Jan if he stayed at Burnley...

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:33 pm
by irblinx
Original Dub wrote:
avoidconfusion wrote:I just can't see how a shit team of cloggers like Bolton could use a technical wiz kid like Weiss?


In fairness, they won't be half as "cloggerish" under Coyle and that's the reaosn they wanted him... it also says coyle wanted Vlad this Jan if he stayed at Burnley...


Spot on, Coyle knows he'll need some major squad surgery to get Bolton playing football. I can see pos and neg in this tbh, I think Vlad is a good option off the bench for us but he is still raw and could do with a bit more first team experience to know when to pass, when to elaborate etc.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:33 pm
by ant london
Good riddance

Just not good enough

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:34 pm
by Original Dub
ant london wrote:Good riddance

Just not good enough


WUM

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:35 pm
by Ted Hughes
Vlad needs to be playing games regularly. Inferior young members of the Slovakian side such as Stoch (sp?) are playing week in week out & no doubt would look better than him in our 1st team right now because of it. He has all the attributes to be great player but has no idea how to actually play football because he never gets a game. It's simply not fair. Loan him out or play him regularly, one or the other.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:36 pm
by ant london
Original Dub wrote:
ant london wrote:Good riddance

Just not good enough


WUM


spoilsport haha

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:37 pm
by CityFanFromRome
Well if Hughes was still here I'd be all for a loan, now with Mancini and his record about blooding youngsters into his sides I would be a bit more cautious, but I still think if he goes in a team where he plays week in week out then it could be a good move as we would never play him that much this season so he could get more experience there than here.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:42 pm
by Ted Hughes
CityFanFromRome wrote:Well if Hughes was still here I'd be all for a loan, now with Mancini and his record about blooding youngsters into his sides I would be a bit more cautious, but I still think if he goes in a team where he plays week in week out then it could be a good move as we would never play him that much this season so he could get more experience there than here.



Hughes said he was going to start playing him more as the season went on. Mancini needs to do the same or let him learn somewhere else so we've got a PL player for next season.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:50 pm
by Socrates
CTID Hants wrote:
Crossie wrote:Loan would be absolutely perfect.

They are not direct rivals, and he wouldnt be able to play against us. I really hope this happens
.


I agree it would be good for him to gain more experience in the Prem although i know KK will not agree with them not being direct rivals. (doesn't agree with loaning to anyone in the Prem, but on this occasion i believe it to be perfect, their laegue position, location just up the road.


KK is wrong on that one. If we strengthen a team that isn't a direct rival then they may be more likely to take points off teams that ARE direct rivals.

Re: Farewell Vlad?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:59 pm
by Ted Hughes
Socrates wrote:
CTID Hants wrote:
Crossie wrote:Loan would be absolutely perfect.

They are not direct rivals, and he wouldnt be able to play against us. I really hope this happens
.


I agree it would be good for him to gain more experience in the Prem although i know KK will not agree with them not being direct rivals. (doesn't agree with loaning to anyone in the Prem, but on this occasion i believe it to be perfect, their laegue position, location just up the road.


KK is wrong on that one. If we strengthen a team that isn't a direct rival then they may be more likely to take points off teams that ARE direct rivals.



Be great to see him given free reign to run at the rags etc.