Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
s1ty m wrote:Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
thing is, you cannot cut out all the threats, the rags have a lot of weapons. we have no other viable left back and we are struggling to cobble together a defence. after all, noone in the back 4 is in their regular slot. though vinny must be first pick there now.
i thought our approach in the last 20 was suicidal.
and benjani should have just sprinted about like a madman, he was fresh against tired legs. but did he break sweat?
Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
Wonderwall wrote:s1ty m wrote:Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
thing is, you cannot cut out all the threats, the rags have a lot of weapons. we have no other viable left back and we are struggling to cobble together a defence. after all, noone in the back 4 is in their regular slot. though vinny must be first pick there now.
i thought our approach in the last 20 was suicidal.
and benjani should have just sprinted about like a madman, he was fresh against tired legs. but did he break sweat?
he was saving himself for the 30 mins of fergie time
JB wrote:Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
I do get your thinking, but agree with keeping Bellers on for his defensive qualities rather than Rigsby's.
Wonderwall wrote:JB wrote:Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
I do get your thinking, but agree with keeping Bellers on for his defensive qualities rather than Rigsby's.
mancini is paid to make those decisions and it paid off..... just! Next time lets hope he uses attack as a form of defence as if we keep things status quo, they are going to have to commit players forward and if we leave a quick man up top, we can put the tie to bed.
JB wrote:Wonderwall wrote:JB wrote:Wonderwall wrote:I enjoyed the quick change when he saw it wasn't working and he changed things for the better. He didnt cut out the valencia threat which was really annoying as everyone could see it. I also hated the fact that he sat back on the 18 yard line from 80 mins onwards. We will get ripped apart at OT with the same tactics.
IMO Petrov being brought on for bellers, who was knackered would have given utd a real problem as his pace would have murdered them as they pressed us for the equaliser.
I do get your thinking, but agree with keeping Bellers on for his defensive qualities rather than Rigsby's.
mancini is paid to make those decisions and it paid off..... just! Next time lets hope he uses attack as a form of defence as if we keep things status quo, they are going to have to commit players forward and if we leave a quick man up top, we can put the tie to bed.
You're not wrong, very edgy stuff. I don't think we're much good at the catanaccio, or whatever it's called. I would have liked us to keep possession further up the pitch and put them under a bit of pressure instead of inviting them on to us.
CityFanFromRome wrote:I definitely agree that sitting back at the end was very risky, and that Valencia could have been controlled better, but I think him being dangerous was more due to us sitting back than anything else, he was barely noticeable until we started defending the lead, bar their first goal which he set up.
Wonderwall wrote:CityFanFromRome wrote:I definitely agree that sitting back at the end was very risky, and that Valencia could have been controlled better, but I think him being dangerous was more due to us sitting back than anything else, he was barely noticeable until we started defending the lead, bar their first goal which he set up.
Valencia was given room from the first few minutes, if you manage to see the game again have a look. I thought Mancini would have cut that supply line and he didnt, which surprised me. I would have asked Garrido to push 10 yards to the left to ensure Valencia didnt get the run on him but he would have at least had a chance of the 50/50 tackles. We allowed valencia to waltz all over our left hand side and it was very hit and miss as we have Zabba there one minute and the next he played right mid and SWP was pushed into the centre!
It worked though, so well done Mancini and thank you.
CityFanFromRome wrote:I know it may be better to enjoy the win at the moment but I just wanted to point out how we switched to a diamond 4-4-2 in the second half, with SWP behind the strikers, and how I thought it worked quite well until the last 15 minutes when we were clearly trying to hold onto the lead, plus we were also quite tired.
What do you think of it? I think Ireland could shine in that kind of formation, played in SWP's position, but then, assuming De Jong sits in front of the defence, the other two spots in central midfield will be u for grabs for Barry, Zabaleta, Vieira, and possibly SWP to start from there and maybe interchange positions with Stevie during the match, and make runs from the middle to the flank when he finds space to give us a bit of width.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, patrickblue, zuricity and 131 guests