john68 wrote:Dub,
I am of the opinion that you have an opinion and it is your right to express your opinion because this board is all about having an opinion to express.
However, though you are of one opinion, you are also of the opinion that your opinion is correct and that others should not post their opinion if their opinion is not the same opinion as your opinion....which is bollox.
Ohthers who have a different opinion to your opinion have every right to express that opinion even if their opinion does not match your opinion.
In my opinion my opinion is the correct opinion but I would not criticise someone elses opinion to criticise my opinion if they thought their opinion was correct.
Well, that's my opinion.
Its all about opinions then? :)
It must be the way I post, because you're the third or fourth person who has interpreted my OP to mean you are never allowed have an opinion unless it matches mine, and it baffles me slightly.
The object of the post was because over the last few months each of these players has had threads started about them saying they are not good enough for this level. Not that they felt they have underperformed, that they are NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
So my point was that they can't all not be good enough because we will be fourth if win our games in hand, so as a team they quite clearly are!
I've criticised players as well after a match (eeeeees norrrrrrrrrmal no?), of course I have. I haven't started campaigns against them though and over reacted by saying they should be sold or playing reserve football and I wanted to see what the thinking was behind it. So to those of you I offended I apologise, I just think as fans we over react more than others and I wanted to see if folk reckoned it was because we have money to throw at a problem that might require patience and perseverence.
Do you think as fans we over react because we know we have the money to throw at a problem, where as other teams might be a little more patient and as a result be slower to want a player replaced permanently?