Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:--------------------------------------------------------------------
But NQDP - you are the common denominator here - unless you are incredibly thick skinned you must see that - so you are either:
a) incredibly thick skinned
b) on a WU or
c) just entirely self obsessed
I cannot see any other options
I do not want this to become another one of 'those threads' - but whenever 'those threads' occur - you can be found at the heart of them - followed by bollocks comments as you try to sound all statesman like and ignore the fact that you were the instigator in the first place
I only pick you up on it because I think that it is a really shallow way to act - but I am sure most of the other members see it as clearly
Your utterly thicko comment about "..like last year.." diverted this thread - and now you are saying others are going on about Hughes - you might need to swear and insult - last bastion of a failed argument - but you never answered the question
If this becomes another one of 'those threads' - an objective analysis (ie not your self obsessed viewpoint) will show that (yet again) you were the instigator
Hold on. You are full of shit as per usual. It wasn't ME who started talking about Hughes.
But, I'm going to try and ignore you from now on. I think you and that other weirdo are whiners and moaners who add absolutely nothing on this site while having a cheek of commenting on the quality. I can take criticism from people who actually add something here but not from stooges like you two.
NDQP -lets be clear about one thing - and I would love to see the massive number of posts to shout me down (not from you)
On your pet subject - you cannot not take criticism - you are unable to see how you stir this site up - you just cop out blaming others
So lets be clear, as Carl would say - YOU CANNOT TAKE CRITICISM!!!
And - there was a fair question - and you diverted the thread - AGAIN!!!
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:11 pm