Not even when he was limping around feeling his hamstring?Beefymcfc wrote:He didn't look injured!
King Kev wrote:Not even when he was limping around feeling his hamstring?Beefymcfc wrote:He didn't look injured!
Yes he was!! See MMR's post above and Doug's post in the match thread.gillie wrote:KK Stevie played well imo but he was'nt injured it was our defensive minded caoches opinnion that we have what we hold.I wont appologise for this but we are so defensive now Stevie sticks out like a sore thumb as a player that cant play defensive so he will get the hook every time.
King Kev wrote:Yes he was!! See MMR's post above and Doug's post in the match thread.gillie wrote:KK Stevie played well imo but he was'nt injured it was our defensive minded caoches opinnion that we have what we hold.I wont appologise for this but we are so defensive now Stevie sticks out like a sore thumb as a player that cant play defensive so he will get the hook every time.
Not wisdom, realism.gillie wrote:King Kev wrote:Yes he was!! See MMR's post above and Doug's post in the match thread.gillie wrote:KK Stevie played well imo but he was'nt injured it was our defensive minded caoches opinnion that we have what we hold.I wont appologise for this but we are so defensive now Stevie sticks out like a sore thumb as a player that cant play defensive so he will get the hook every time.
Well i bow to superior wisdom lol.
King Kev wrote:Not wisdom, realism.gillie wrote:King Kev wrote:Yes he was!! See MMR's post above and Doug's post in the match thread.gillie wrote:KK Stevie played well imo but he was'nt injured it was our defensive minded caoches opinnion that we have what we hold.I wont appologise for this but we are so defensive now Stevie sticks out like a sore thumb as a player that cant play defensive so he will get the hook every time.
Well i bow to superior wisdom lol.
Wooders wrote:shouldn't have started then - or been replaced earlier - fed up of excuses at the moment to be honest
BlueMoonAwoken wrote:If you looked at the subs bench there was no attacking players on it bar santa cruz? im tired at the moment but are all out attcking players injured?
We had a chance to get this game out of the way without having an even tougher battle away at stoke where the players will know they have been in a game. Winning breads confidence , playing defensively against stoke does not.
Moonchesteri wrote:BlueMoonAwoken wrote:If you looked at the subs bench there was no attacking players on it bar santa cruz? im tired at the moment but are all out attcking players injured?
We had a chance to get this game out of the way without having an even tougher battle away at stoke where the players will know they have been in a game. Winning breads confidence , playing defensively against stoke does not.
Quite right you were. Just checked and the bench of Unused subs was:
Taylor, Onuoha, Garrido, Sylvinho, Boyata.
Though, I think he could've tried of making Garrido a left winger. Not fan of players being played out of position but he has always looked better going forward than at defending...
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bear60, belleebee, blues2win, carolina-blue, Mase, Nigels Tackle, Sparklehorse, stevefromdonny and 558 guests