gillie wrote:We spend over 200 mil and our attacking midfielder gets (injured) and we only have a DM to come on for him.No playmaker on the bench the question is why?.The answer is plain and simple our gaffer is like a rabbit in the head lights ne is shit scared of losing.And i blame the owners for this in the way they got rid of the last incumbent.I dont rate Mancini but i want him to do well for us but i think he is being too cautious at home and thats why we play 3DMs.
john68 wrote:I think he will stick to this strategy and try and hone it at least until the end of the season.
Really? Well I'd have never guessed!gillie wrote:We spend over 200 mil and our attacking midfielder gets (injured) and we only have a DM to come on for him.No playmaker on the bench the question is why?.The answer is plain and simple our gaffer is like a rabbit in the head lights ne is shit scared of losing.And i blame the owners for this in the way they got rid of the last incumbent.I dont rate Mancini but i want him to do well for us but i think he is being too cautious at home and thats why we play 3DMs.
King Kev wrote:Really? Well I'd have never guessed!gillie wrote:We spend over 200 mil and our attacking midfielder gets (injured) and we only have a DM to come on for him.No playmaker on the bench the question is why?.The answer is plain and simple our gaffer is like a rabbit in the head lights ne is shit scared of losing.And i blame the owners for this in the way they got rid of the last incumbent.I dont rate Mancini but i want him to do well for us but i think he is being too cautious at home and thats why we play 3DMs.
Seriously though, is it worth having another sticky for hughes? It seems that some people are totally incapable of getting over the fact that he has gone. Maybe we could have it as some sort of shrine to the great one? Leaving the rest of us to move forward!
john@staustell wrote:Quite right Zurich fella. Vieira was played forward, which he can do and did do fairly well.
How many negative threads do we need? One point takes us to 4th in the league, we were in the semi of the league cup and are still in the FA cup - not already out as some seem to think. All that alone makes it the best season for many a long year.
And the principle is simple - you build a rock-solid defensive line and don't let the other teams score at all. One way of doing this is by keeping the ball. You then score by having top class, counter-attacking forwards. The plan is clear, it's getting the right training, discipline and personnel that takes longer - especially the bit about not giving the ball away.
Personally I think our most devastating players in the last 14 league matches will be Tevez, Bellamy (when fit/not beaten up) and Johnson. None were available on Saturday.
zuricity wrote:Will people stop craping on about Defensive Midfielders. DM's....
When PV can on on Saturday he played in a forward - offensive role !
Furthermore talking about defensive play. Did you notice how often Stevie Ireland dropped deep in midfield during the game ?
Probably not. Although he was supposed to play in attack !
I firmly believe that if Mancini gets City to the top four, he will get all the resources he needs to build a top team.
I simply cannot believe that he is happy with Adebayors lazy football, or De Jongs / Barry's lack of creative play. Also, I'm sure he will replace Toure , given the chance.
Mancini can do nothing about Bellamy getting his head kicked-in in a night club can he ? Furthermore we don't know the circumstances behind Tevez's leave.
This is a silly thread. Absolutely no blame can be laid at Mancinis feet for the 200 mill spent
Gloryhunter123 wrote:Why the fuck did we let Elano go ?
john68 wrote:Kev...NQDP,
You make the point regarding Hughes and quote Gillie. Gillie NEVER mentioned Hughes. He criticised Mancini but it was you who brought Hughes out of the cupboard.
Maybe it is you who needs a Hughes sticky. Most of the others have accepted that Hughes has gone and are merely analysing and debating the PRESENT situation.
HUGHES..[strike]IN[/strike]...[strike]OUT[/strike]...GONE....Please keep up.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:john68 wrote:Kev...NQDP,
You make the point regarding Hughes and quote Gillie. Gillie NEVER mentioned Hughes. He criticised Mancini but it was you who brought Hughes out of the cupboard.
Maybe it is you who needs a Hughes sticky. Most of the others have accepted that Hughes has gone and are merely analysing and debating the PRESENT situation.
HUGHES..[strike]IN[/strike]...[strike]OUT[/strike]...GONE....Please keep up.
Exactly how I see it John.It is possible to have an opinion about Mancini without it relating to a previous manager.
And as for Vieira looking better than Ireland as an attacking midfield player I think I was watching a different game. For that opening 10 or 15 minutes Ireland was excellent and played just as we all know he can. What happened after that I don't know. He might have got his injury early or it might have been down to the caution of the manager adapting his role as we were ahead. When Vieira came on we weren't ahead anymore so whoever it was replacing Ireland would naturally get forward more but I have to say his forays into the box and past Ade must have bypassed me. He can play a more attacking role for sure and find key passes but he won't ever be able to play it asIreland can .
john68 wrote:Kev...NQDP,
You make the point regarding Hughes and quote Gillie. Gillie NEVER mentioned Hughes. He criticised Mancini but it was you who brought Hughes out of the cupboard.
Maybe it is you who needs a Hughes sticky. Most of the others have accepted that Hughes has gone and are merely analysing and debating the PRESENT situation.
HUGHES..[strike]IN[/strike]...[strike]OUT[/strike]...GONE....Please keep up.
john@staustell wrote:Gloryhunter123 wrote:Why the fuck did we let Elano go ?
Dont even go there! Cos he's fucking shite basically.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: blues-clues, gmercer1, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, nottsblue, salford city and 545 guests