Page 1 of 3

Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:04 pm
by paulmclaren
Given-6-nowt to do.
Zabaleta-6-got stuck in as you would expect, nothing else though.
Kompany-8-solid yet again.
Lesscott-8-these two are our best defenders.
Bridge-6-nothing spectacular,defended well.
Swp-5-very poor again,I'm having serious doubts about him in this team.
Barry-5-untill he got a kick he sprung to life, other then that,not good enough, needs resting.
De Jong-7-broke play up as u expect him to do.
Ireland-4-dire fucking bolocal, ain't no superman this guy, lazyman maybe.
Johnson-6-would of been an 8 from first half, faded badly.
Ade-7-worked harder for a change, unlucky.

Subs.
Bellamy-6-injected a bit of pace and life when on the ball.
Ibrahim-6-didn't look to bad.

Mancini-6-negativity cost us yet again, liverpool were there for the taking.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:09 pm
by Green in blue
paulmclaren wrote:Given-6-nowt to do.
Zabaleta-6-got stuck in as you would expect, nothing else though.
Kompany-8-solid yet again.
Lesscott-8-these two are our best defenders.
Bridge-6-nothing spectacular,defended well.
Swp-5-very poor again,I'm having serious doubts about him in this team.
Barry-5-untill he got a kick he sprung to life, other then that,not good enough, needs resting.
De Jong-7-broke play up as u expect him to do.
Ireland-4-dire fucking bolocal, ain't no superman this guy, lazyman maybe.
Johnson-6-would of been an 8 from first half, faded badly.
Ade-7-worked harder for a chance, unlucky.

Subs.
Bellamy-6-injected a bit of pace and life when on the ball.
Ibrahim-6-didn't look to bad.

Mancini-6-negativity cost us yet again, liverpool were there for the taking.



1. zabba was motm
2. thats the most attacking line up in weeks

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:10 pm
by Socrates
We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:11 pm
by Nick
Green in blue wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:Given-6-nowt to do.
Zabaleta-6-got stuck in as you would expect, nothing else though.
Kompany-8-solid yet again.
Lesscott-8-these two are our best defenders.
Bridge-6-nothing spectacular,defended well.
Swp-5-very poor again,I'm having serious doubts about him in this team.
Barry-5-untill he got a kick he sprung to life, other then that,not good enough, needs resting.
De Jong-7-broke play up as u expect him to do.
Ireland-4-dire fucking bolocal, ain't no superman this guy, lazyman maybe.
Johnson-6-would of been an 8 from first half, faded badly.
Ade-7-worked harder for a chance, unlucky.

Subs.
Bellamy-6-injected a bit of pace and life when on the ball.
Ibrahim-6-didn't look to bad.

Mancini-6-negativity cost us yet again, liverpool were there for the taking.



1. zabba was motm
2. thats the most attacking line up in weeks


Ibrahim didnt look too bad?! I struggle to see how he has the same ratings as bridge and zabba who I thought did well going forward. There the only driving force we seem to have. Bring back the bloody 4-3-3 with tevez in it.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:11 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
paulmclaren wrote:Zabaleta-6-got stuck in as you would expect, nothing else though.



I suspected you didn't even watch the game on another thread. Now I KNOW you didn't watch the game.

Brilliant performance from Zabba.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:12 pm
by LookMumImOnMCF.net
Given - 7 Untested
Zabs - 9 Brilliant
Kompany - 7
Lescott - 7
Bridge - 7
Barry - 6
De Jong - 7.5
Johnson - 7.5
SWP - 6
Ireland - 6
Ade - 7.5

Bellamy - 6
Ibrahim - 6

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:12 pm
by paulmclaren
Socrates wrote:We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Opinions dick face.
Opinions.
And it wasn't a attacking display, it was a hard working display.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:12 pm
by sidSmith
That's hard on SWP. He didn't have a great game but he really is crippled when Mancini insists he plays on the left for most of the game. Luckily Johnson can use both feet but it hinders him as well. It's so easy for the defend, just show him the outside and best case we get a corner.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:13 pm
by paulmclaren
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:Zabaleta-6-got stuck in as you would expect, nothing else though.



I suspected you didn't even watch the game on another thread. Now I KNOW you didn't watch the game.

Brilliant performance from Zabba.

I come home from work halfway through the first half.
So i watched it.
Does that make sense?
Obviously not.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:14 pm
by avoidconfusion
Please do us all a favour and fuck off from this website, you are no City fan.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:14 pm
by paulmclaren
Socrates wrote:We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Yeah on ur girlfriends cracker :P

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:14 pm
by Green in blue
paulmclaren wrote:
Socrates wrote:We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Opinions dick face.
Opinions.
And it wasn't a attacking display, it was a hard working display.


ur due a ban u snidey piece of work. try leaving a post without swearing at respected members of the board

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:17 pm
by Fidel Castro
Given - 6
Zabba - 8
Bridge - 7
Kompo - 8
Lescott - 8
SWP - 5
Johnson - 7
de Jong - 7
Barry - 6
Ireland - 4 (blame it on the hughesie? blame it on the shackles? BLAME IT ON THE BOOGIE!)
Adebayor - 7

I thought we were the better team but fuck knows what that Ibrahim sub was about?! Should've brought Bellamy on for KuntaKinte and given Ade the support he deserved.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:22 pm
by Nick
I wouldnt be surprised if mancini wanted to fuck ireland off. He seems to give players a few starts, then if there shit he fucks them off. Thats not really what managements about IMO. We saw with the ibrahim sub that we have nothing else. Why the fuck he didnt get a few more loans in I dont know.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:26 pm
by paulmclaren
Green in blue wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:
Socrates wrote:We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Opinions dick face.
Opinions.
And it wasn't a attacking display, it was a hard working display.


ur due a ban u snidey piece of work. try leaving a post without swearing at respected members of the board

What eeeeeer.
Like all the abuse i get off everyone else for having an opinion on things?

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:27 pm
by paulmclaren
Fidel Castro wrote:Given - 6
Zabba - 8
Bridge - 7
Kompo - 8
Lescott - 8
SWP - 5
Johnson - 7
de Jong - 7
Barry - 6
Ireland - 4 (blame it on the hughesie? blame it on the shackles? BLAME IT ON THE BOOGIE!)
Adebayor - 7

I thought we were the better team but fuck knows what that Ibrahim sub was about?! Should've brought Bellamy on for KuntaKinte and given Ade the support he deserved.


God someone see's a bit of sense.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:27 pm
by Green in blue
paulmclaren wrote:
Green in blue wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:
Socrates wrote:We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Opinions dick face.
Opinions.
And it wasn't a attacking display, it was a hard working display.


ur due a ban u snidey piece of work. try leaving a post without swearing at respected members of the board

What eeeeeer.
Like all the abuse i get off everyone else for having an opinion on things?


its for being a cunt

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:28 pm
by paulmclaren
avoidconfusion wrote:Please do us all a favour and fuck off from this website, you are no City fan.

And you have proof of this do you?
Didn't think so.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:28 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Fidel Castro wrote:Given - 6
Zabba - 8
Bridge - 7
Kompo - 8
Lescott - 8
SWP - 5
Johnson - 7
de Jong - 7
Barry - 6
Ireland - 4 (blame it on the hughesie? blame it on the shackles? BLAME IT ON THE BOOGIE!)
Adebayor - 7

I thought we were the better team but fuck knows what that Ibrahim sub was about?! Should've brought Bellamy on for KuntaKinte and given Ade the support he deserved.


Well out of order.

Re: Rating ves scousers

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:29 pm
by paulmclaren
Green in blue wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:
Green in blue wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:
Socrates wrote:We weren't remotely negative, I take it back he isn't just on the booze he must be on crack...

Opinions dick face.
Opinions.
And it wasn't a attacking display, it was a hard working display.


ur due a ban u snidey piece of work. try leaving a post without swearing at respected members of the board

What eeeeeer.
Like all the abuse i get off everyone else for having an opinion on things?


its for being a cunt

I ain't being no cunt.
If i wanted to be a cunt.
I would.
I have opinions what obviously not everyone agrees with.
There my opinions.
Why am i being a cunt?