Original Dub wrote:
Right, its clear as day that you believe their to be an agenda against Mancini himself as you intimate it in every post.
Be a man and name those who don't want city to do well. Tell us who doesn't really support City. Tell us why they want Mancini to fail. Or else chill out with the conspiracy theories because its getting a bit tedious mate and because I'm one of those who wasn't impressed with performances of late and getting knocked out of two cups, I'm starting to think you are putting me in that category, so I really am intrigued to see who's on your list?
What he said....I always rated you as a poster previously. You were/are one of those who were anti-Hughes who could at least put their views forward in a manner which enabled other sane people to respond.
Aligning yourself with the rabid idiots who are nodding in agreement with each other in this thread does you no favours.
As OD says......no-one is anti-Mancini. Lots of us have been angry at him, disappointed in what we've been served up to date but no-one has an agenda, I'm pretty certain EVERYONE wants to avoid more fucking regime change, upheaval and chaos, I certainly want him to succeed.
Yes, I have said (after a match and when feelings running very high after a shite performance) that I wanted him "out of my club" but I've not then continued banging on about it once I've calmed down in the cold light of day. I think that applies equally for most posters who harbour doubts as to whether he has the right stuff.
I don't want a new manager and I certainly have nothing against Roberto Mancini. I just want us to seem like we are moving forward rather than backwards. I hope that Saturday is the start of that process. But if you, or anyone else thinks that "out of respect" we should put up quietly with unacceptable results and performances then you are delusional.