MaineRoadMemories wrote:I'm still buzzing after the win and attacking football we showed in the second half :-)
Perspective tells me that Mancini has the whodoo over Ancelotti when you compare their head to head records. It was a very italian style match for the premiership and Mancini knew how to play against that set-up (a team that plays with no width whats-so-ever).
Mancini struggles against teams that play wide and cross into the box often, the traditional English way.
Ted Hughes wrote:Chinners wrote:john@staustell wrote:It's good but it's only the start, and this is the same outfit so villified recently. But it should serve to temper a little of the amazing hysteria we have had here in the last week. I never like to attack fellow posters or disrespect opinions, but this last week has made me despair about some of the rubbish I've read. Some should hang their heads.
Now Mancini is here, like it or not. So for goodness sake lets get behind the lads, stop attacking them and the manager, and make a real drive for fourth. We have a fortnights rest now to get ourselves together and get everyone fit.
AND GO FOR IT.
This ... my concern is that we seem to raise the bar for these games and that the dire stuff returns next, still enjoy the moment i SAY
This could be a turning point though if Mancini keeps pushing them to break forward with more purpose. I thought it could before the game & I think so even more now. I just wish we had a game straight away to keep the momentum going so it doesn't wear off after all the wanky international friendlies.
Mr Miyagi wrote:john@staustell wrote:It's good but it's only the start, and this is the same outfit so villified recently. But it should serve to temper a little of the amazing hysteria we have had here in the last week. I never like to attack fellow posters or disrespect opinions, but this last week has made me despair about some of the rubbish I've read. Some should hang their heads.
Now Mancini is here, like it or not. So for goodness sake lets get behind the lads, stop attacking them and the manager, and make a real drive for fourth. We have a fortnights rest now to get ourselves together and get everyone fit.
AND GO FOR IT.
It was so bad after the Stoke game I stayed away for a few days... now I'm back to gloat :-)
After the Stoke game I noticed there were about 400 members logged on. Today it was far less. That shows how people love to come out of the woodwork and havve a good moan.
This is something I have noticed too, it's nothing new to this site, in fact I remember a few years ago posting that when we win something this site will be dead as people will have nothing to moan about!Mr Miyagi wrote:After the Stoke game I noticed there were about 400 members logged on. Today it was far less. That shows how people love to come out of the woodwork and havve a good moan.
Colin the King wrote:
Just to pick up on this, have you noticed/what do you think of our tendency to have the full backs deployed so centrally when we're defending? On one hand, it makes it more difficult for the opponent to get a clean shot at goal or make a meaningful run into the box, but when it comes to wing play we put very few obstacles in place. It's like having five central defenders in defensive mode and they only become full backs when we're attacking.
As you say it was effective against Chelsea but I can think of instances where it wouldn't be. I still have trouble sleeping at night when I think of that Semi-Final- the ball constantly being sprayed across to Valencia, who had about 20 yards all to himself to make a decision while Garrido stood on the edge of the 18 yard box.
Mr Miyagi wrote:Colin the King wrote:
Just to pick up on this, have you noticed/what do you think of our tendency to have the full backs deployed so centrally when we're defending? On one hand, it makes it more difficult for the opponent to get a clean shot at goal or make a meaningful run into the box, but when it comes to wing play we put very few obstacles in place. It's like having five central defenders in defensive mode and they only become full backs when we're attacking.
As you say it was effective against Chelsea but I can think of instances where it wouldn't be. I still have trouble sleeping at night when I think of that Semi-Final- the ball constantly being sprayed across to Valencia, who had about 20 yards all to himself to make a decision while Garrido stood on the edge of the 18 yard box.
There is nothing wrong with a tight back four. What they are supposed to do is slide across the pitch as a unit. The fullback can press out wide, but the other three are meant to keep their distance. Same with the midfielders in front. The theory is that even if the opposition do try and switch play the slide to the other flank can happen while the ball is in the air. But it takes a lot of organisation to do that. Perhaps Mancini is not confident enough yet and is telling them not to bother sliding across the pitch as much. All those players keeping a perfect box shape between them takes a lot of work. We have also suffered from lots of personnel changes in defence which makes the system more difficult.
There is no problem with conceding space out wide and letting the opposition put crosses in when you have central defenders and more importantly a goalkeeper who can deal with any kind of aerial threat....oh shit.....
Socrates wrote:Yesterday showed us how completely reliant we currently are on Tevez. His return was the difference. We will continue to struggle a little whenever he is missing as we still have a lack of effective central attacking midfield options. Unless Ireland returns to form as well as fitness we will continue to see ineffective midfielders pressing forward and Mancini compensating by regularly switching wingers so they can switch inside. We don't have a Michael Johnson type player either - someone who will surge forward with the ball through the midfield areas. You can manage without one or the other type of player but without both you get the difficult to watch football we have been seeing and an absolute reliance on Tevez to make things happen in those central areas.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Mr Miyagi wrote:john@staustell wrote:It's good but it's only the start, and this is the same outfit so villified recently. But it should serve to temper a little of the amazing hysteria we have had here in the last week. I never like to attack fellow posters or disrespect opinions, but this last week has made me despair about some of the rubbish I've read. Some should hang their heads.
Now Mancini is here, like it or not. So for goodness sake lets get behind the lads, stop attacking them and the manager, and make a real drive for fourth. We have a fortnights rest now to get ourselves together and get everyone fit.
AND GO FOR IT.
It was so bad after the Stoke game I stayed away for a few days... now I'm back to gloat :-)
After the Stoke game I noticed there were about 400 members logged on. Today it was far less. That shows how people love to come out of the woodwork and havve a good moan.
It's been like that always. ALL our visitor records have been after game lost.
Match thread for Stoke loss was about 25 pages long, Chelsea away win it was 13 pages. That's the way it is.
Personally I stayed away last night first time for a very long time after a game. Rather celebrated by myself than come here and see people picking holes from what was just about as perfect game for me as any. Real marque game for Mancini as well.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, blues-clues, gmercer1, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, MIAMCFC, nottsblue, salford city and 551 guests