Ted Hughes wrote:brite blu sky wrote:Well put it this way, it is something that obviously has to evolve.. and probably initially inspired by someone that for starters achieves some success. So put like that it is obvious City have not been anywhere near getting something set up.
But things have changed, and the City hierarchy must be aware of such debates as this, and i would be interested to get the take of someone so closely involved with the system at City to see what their response is to being asked that question.
Tbf it's something only one or two special clubs do. I thought we were going to be one that built a similar structure though. Mancini is probably the last chance for that to happen. If we move him on quickly then we've established our club philosophy ; change.
not sure i would buy the last chance bit, but for sure City are now in a superb position to have a go at establishing such an attitude, ethos and style.
When our last chance of anything approaching that happened the club fucled it up big time. you get the impression that wont be allowed to happen this time ( look at the investment proposals for Manchester and the club ).
So far i have stayed on the fence as to whether Mancini is the Man and put simply it depends on bringing that first bit of success to build on, but he does seem to have all the necessaries. If he gets himself established at City then he may well be the kind of person ( and footballing talent ) to inspire the grounding of an ethos at the club. i certainly hope so anyways, as long as.. like a lot of other fans.. the football we generate is some of the best you are likely to see.
Manchester City was on the brink of being a special club and lost the plot, we have a second shot at it now and it must be in the thinking of those at the club organising everything, that our ambition of becoming the best club in the world means that we will be special, very special. So for me i want to hear about the plans that we have for the world wide academy system and how that fits into the plans for the team. I want to know if they are thinking about the relationship of the academies to the club and the current team / manager, i want to know if they are considering and debating and generating ideas about the style, ethos and attitude of City in the future. The ambition is to get into a situation where we are actually dominating the Real Madrids, Barca's, Bayern's, Milan's, Arsenal, Chelsea etc etc..
To do that, we are going to have to both be and have something pretty fuclin special on the pitch and off it.
Jim Cassell is an inside man with a great deal of understanding of what the club is tryng to do, in fact he remains an integral part of that ambition, so what is wrong with asking him what consideration has been given to a Barca style integrated academy by the powers that be at the club?