Tokyo Blue wrote:The ball clearly hit his chest. It was shown from multiple angles on Japanese telly and from each one it was clear-cut enough for me to believe that the linesman, who couldn't get his flag up quickly enough, was a cheat. That was not a thing you can get wrong by accident, especially from the angle the linesman had.
Incidentally, the Japanese commentators also agreed with me that it was not handball and while their knowledge is not that great, unlike me they have no axe to grind.
Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:The ball clearly hit his chest. It was shown from multiple angles on Japanese telly and from each one it was clear-cut enough for me to believe that the linesman, who couldn't get his flag up quickly enough, was a cheat. That was not a thing you can get wrong by accident, especially from the angle the linesman had.
Incidentally, the Japanese commentators also agreed with me that it was not handball and while their knowledge is not that great, unlike me they have no axe to grind.
Ref evened it out for us IMO by not giving the 2nd which was clear cut.
Tokyo Blue wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:The ball clearly hit his chest. It was shown from multiple angles on Japanese telly and from each one it was clear-cut enough for me to believe that the linesman, who couldn't get his flag up quickly enough, was a cheat. That was not a thing you can get wrong by accident, especially from the angle the linesman had.
Incidentally, the Japanese commentators also agreed with me that it was not handball and while their knowledge is not that great, unlike me they have no axe to grind.
Ref evened it out for us IMO by not giving the 2nd which was clear cut.
Well, no. There is a big difference between giving a penalty to make it 2-1 with twenty minutes to go and giving a penalty to make it 2-1 in injury time.
Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:Pretty Boy Lee wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:The ball clearly hit his chest. It was shown from multiple angles on Japanese telly and from each one it was clear-cut enough for me to believe that the linesman, who couldn't get his flag up quickly enough, was a cheat. That was not a thing you can get wrong by accident, especially from the angle the linesman had.
Incidentally, the Japanese commentators also agreed with me that it was not handball and while their knowledge is not that great, unlike me they have no axe to grind.
Ref evened it out for us IMO by not giving the 2nd which was clear cut.
Well, no. There is a big difference between giving a penalty to make it 2-1 with twenty minutes to go and giving a penalty to make it 2-1 in injury time.
True, situational factors aside though, there 2nd was a pen IMO. There is a big difference between not giving a pen when 2-0 up and not giving one 2-1 up at the end as well.
Fish111 wrote:Gareths lack of any sort of protest indicated to me that it was a penalty
ant london wrote:Fish111 wrote:Gareths lack of any sort of protest indicated to me that it was a penalty
Mate he was going fucking mental at the ref telling him to FUCK OFF and NO WAY THAT WAS A FUCKING HANDBALL??
He went spasticated
Fish111 wrote:ant london wrote:Fish111 wrote:Gareths lack of any sort of protest indicated to me that it was a penalty
Mate he was going fucking mental at the ref telling him to FUCK OFF and NO WAY THAT WAS A FUCKING HANDBALL??
He went spasticated
I wasn't there ant but the tv showed a little shouting but nothing more, i may have missed it. The replays on tv indicated it was handball and i would be a little more arsed if the decision had cost us the result but in the grand scheme of things it didn't matter in the end. Thankfully.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, blues-clues, gmercer1, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MIAMCFC, nottsblue, salford city and 552 guests