King Kev wrote:Dixon should grow a pair and tell them to either to give us a decent showing or he's off.
avoidconfusion wrote:King Kev wrote:Dixon should grow a pair and tell them to either to give us a decent showing or he's off.
Said that before in a MOTD thread a few weeks back. Hansen, Shearer, Lawro etc. are all biased as fuck.
I would never think that Dixon actually is a City fan the way he talks about them, the only thing he said really was that it was a vital 3 points for the chase of "that 4th spot" .
Also pissed me off how they spent more time talking about how "unlucky" Fulham were and how angry their manager looked than about the actual game and our dominance in it.
guv111 wrote:avoidconfusion wrote:King Kev wrote:Dixon should grow a pair and tell them to either to give us a decent showing or he's off.
Said that before in a MOTD thread a few weeks back. Hansen, Shearer, Lawro etc. are all biased as fuck.
I would never think that Dixon actually is a City fan the way he talks about them, the only thing he said really was that it was a vital 3 points for the chase of "that 4th spot" .
Also pissed me off how they spent more time talking about how "unlucky" Fulham were and how angry their manager looked than about the actual game and our dominance in it.
Didn't MOTD recruit Slaven Bilic recently, on a one-off basis? Maybe I dreamt it, because it transformed the programme into something actually watchabe. Articulate, no particular axe to grind; my senile old memory even seems to recall him speaking up for City while he was being patronised by Alan Hansen et al.
If Dixon were man enough to to have some principles, he would make a point of defending City against the Spurs-for-fourth campaign and other transgressions at BBC/Sport/Fotball and elsewhere in the media. He's comfortably the most eloquent of the regulars, but it seems to me that he's so chuffed to be there, getting paid for chatting about football, that he's terrified of knocking some housewives' favourite's nose out of joint. Either that, or he couldn't really give a monkey's about City. Not while Arsenal are winning.
Manx Blue wrote:
They bring in Bilic Guv and I agree he was a breath of fresh air. From what I seen last night, they didn't talk about the splendid fluent attack and finish for the second goal, just two possible penalty decisions.
I no longer watch the pundits on MOTD or SKY where possible. I find Jamie Redknapp can be fairly balanced in his oppinions and explanations regarding a game, and gives a fresh insight from a player who has recently played the game at a higher tempo than say Lawrenson/Hansen from the 80's
But other than Redknapp, I can't stomach the anti City bias just because the Top four are in the process of being dismantled. A few years ago when we were wallowing in a barrel of Premier league shite, no one gave a damn. Now we have a few bob, I don't care what people think.
I can make my own decisions on how my team are playing, and don't need to listen to the ramblings of a senile former player, who is encouraged to be a controversial as possible in an effort to increase ratings.
WHY DO YOU NOT SHOW A LONGER EDIT OF THE SUNDAY MATCH IN MOTD2?
Unfortunately we're only allowed contractually to show ten minutes of match action from a Sunday live game.
Tokyo Blue wrote:I don't see why Dixon is getting flak for this. It isn't him who edits the studio footage.
If you don't like a programme, why do you watch it? Thirty years ago there were two programmes showing weekend football on the telly, Match of the Day and The Big Match plus Sportsnight (RIP Harry) on Wednesday nights. Now you've got dozens of them to choose from plus the internet.
I am actually pleased we are being ignored; it takes all the pressure off. Let spurs cope with the media expectation.
That is clearly a load of bollocks because they showed way more than 10 minutes of the scouse v scum game!WHY DO YOU NOT SHOW A LONGER EDIT OF THE SUNDAY MATCH IN MOTD2?
Unfortunately we're only allowed contractually to show ten minutes of match action from a Sunday live game.
Whilst he doesn't have control over the edit, I am assuming that he has some control about what he says and what his opinions are. Personally I would like to see him stand up to the City bashing from time to time.Tokyo Blue wrote:I don't see why Dixon is getting flak for this. It isn't him who edits the studio footage.
ant london wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:I don't see why Dixon is getting flak for this. It isn't him who edits the studio footage.
If you don't like a programme, why do you watch it? Thirty years ago there were two programmes showing weekend football on the telly, Match of the Day and The Big Match plus Sportsnight (RIP Harry) on Wednesday nights. Now you've got dozens of them to choose from plus the internet.
I am actually pleased we are being ignored; it takes all the pressure off. Let spurs cope with the media expectation.
I agree with that....I just don't see why some people continue to get upset about this.
It is well commented from longtime on here that the MOTD coverage varies between ignoring City to being actively anti-City
Why watch it? Or if you choose to, why do expect anything other than the type of bias shown previously.
I don't care. "Everyone wants us to fail" hasn't exactly done the scum any harm has it....we just need to use that sentiment from outside to our advantage rather than crying about it
Grob wrote:ant london wrote:Tokyo Blue wrote:I don't see why Dixon is getting flak for this. It isn't him who edits the studio footage.
If you don't like a programme, why do you watch it? Thirty years ago there were two programmes showing weekend football on the telly, Match of the Day and The Big Match plus Sportsnight (RIP Harry) on Wednesday nights. Now you've got dozens of them to choose from plus the internet.
I am actually pleased we are being ignored; it takes all the pressure off. Let spurs cope with the media expectation.
I agree with that....I just don't see why some people continue to get upset about this.
It is well commented from longtime on here that the MOTD coverage varies between ignoring City to being actively anti-City
Why watch it? Or if you choose to, why do expect anything other than the type of bias shown previously.
I don't care. "Everyone wants us to fail" hasn't exactly done the scum any harm has it....we just need to use that sentiment from outside to our advantage rather than crying about it
Agreed. A very precious topic. On Sunday the other 2 matches involved 2 of the countries top 3 teams with one match being a Derby. Of course they were going to get top billing.
LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:Jesus H Christ, some people's "woe is City" stance is bordering on the playground now.
The BBC show the most popular teams to get the most viewers. Simple as. THERE ARE NO CONSPIRACY THEORIES! The sooner people realise that the better, at least for the sanity of this site.
We'd all like to see City on 24/7 with Merson kissing our arse and maybe even Lawro with a cheeky finger. But it's just not going to happen. Not until we start winning the league every year at least.
LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:Jesus H Christ, some people's "woe is City" stance is bordering on the playground now.
The BBC show the most popular teams to get the most viewers. Simple as. THERE ARE NO CONSPIRACY THEORIES! The sooner people realise that the better, at least for the sanity of this site.
We'd all like to see City on 24/7 with Merson kissing our arse and maybe even Lawro with a cheeky finger. But it's just not going to happen. Not until we start winning the league every year at least.
Beefymcfc wrote:LookMumI'mOnMCF.net wrote:Jesus H Christ, some people's "woe is City" stance is bordering on the playground now.
The BBC show the most popular teams to get the most viewers. Simple as. THERE ARE NO CONSPIRACY THEORIES! The sooner people realise that the better, at least for the sanity of this site.
We'd all like to see City on 24/7 with Merson kissing our arse and maybe even Lawro with a cheeky finger. But it's just not going to happen. Not until we start winning the league every year at least.
You mentioned this to me in another thread and wondered if I might be a little paranoid. Well, you answered the question for me as in my eyes, it is a BIG enough reason. It's all about audience and therefore, money.
Thank you very much ;-)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 537 guests