lets all have a disco wrote:Its like flirting with the fittest bird everytime you go out and end up pulling a fucking dog rough one at the end of the last club night of the year and being told its best you could get.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Btajim.
Hi Garry,I just wanted to shake your hand and ask you a question.I go to COMS as mucha as possible but sometimes I cannot leave the house as Sophie.....sorry..Sophie is my Cat...... needs a carer when Im away and sometimes I cannot find one.
My question is ; Is it possible to bring Sophie to matches at COMS in her kitten box and can she come in for free?
btajim wrote:lets all have a disco wrote:Its like flirting with the fittest bird everytime you go out and end up pulling a fucking dog rough one at the end of the last club night of the year and being told its best you could get.
Ian Holloway hijacks Disco's PC?
mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
Grob wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
The guys whose opinion that was hated Mark Hughes. The point raised was handy when trying to belittle him.
Grob wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
The guys whose opinion that was hated Mark Hughes. The point raised was handy when trying to belittle him.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Grob wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
The guys whose opinion that was hated Mark Hughes. The point raised was handy when trying to belittle him.
Bullshit. Really sad to see you lower yourself to level of that wind up clown.
Most people, me included, have stayed pretty much the same with their targets from the beginning of the season. It's only Hughes fanatics who were satisfied with any shit under their favourite boy that bang on now about sacking changing the targets.
bluej wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Grob wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
The guys whose opinion that was hated Mark Hughes. The point raised was handy when trying to belittle him.
Bullshit. Really sad to see you lower yourself to level of that wind up clown.
Most people, me included, have stayed pretty much the same with their targets from the beginning of the season. It's only Hughes fanatics who were satisfied with any shit under their favourite boy that bang on now about sacking changing the targets.
[highlight]But surely the targets changed with his sacking? Given that we were 5th when he was sacked the target must be 4th?[/highlight]
I would deem this season a failure if we don't get 4th for those reasons. (although I personally would be happy with any european football)
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:bluej wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Grob wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Is it just me? - or do others when they read this thread think back to the 'anti' threads in October - December - the threads that harped on about ambition and the how we should be demanding 4th absolutely - despite pre-season targets of 6th - and think - double standards????
Surely anything les than 4th is a major failing - especially with the squad we had and the position we were in at December??
Why all the reversing of positions?
The guys whose opinion that was hated Mark Hughes. The point raised was handy when trying to belittle him.
Bullshit. Really sad to see you lower yourself to level of that wind up clown.
Most people, me included, have stayed pretty much the same with their targets from the beginning of the season. It's only Hughes fanatics who were satisfied with any shit under their favourite boy that bang on now about sacking changing the targets.
[highlight]But surely the targets changed with his sacking? Given that we were 5th when he was sacked the target must be 4th?[/highlight]
I would deem this season a failure if we don't get 4th for those reasons. (although I personally would be happy with any european football)
We were NOT fifth when he was sacked. When the decision over his sacking was taken we were 8th. When he was sacked we were 6th.
Original Dub wrote:
Irrelevent.
The target was 70 points and we were on course to achieve it. There is no such thing as a hughes fanatic, so I don't know why you're trying to provoke people there mate.
But you're making stuff up to suit yourself and you've become a lot calmer about performances and targets since Mancini took over. That's obvious for everyone to see, so you shouldn't get offended when its pointed out.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Original Dub wrote:
Irrelevent.
The target was 70 points and we were on course to achieve it. There is no such thing as a hughes fanatic, so I don't know why you're trying to provoke people there mate.
But you're making stuff up to suit yourself and you've become a lot calmer about performances and targets since Mancini took over. That's obvious for everyone to see, so you shouldn't get offended when its pointed out.
Irrelevant or not, he was twisting the truth.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bear60, carolina-blue, gilford, Google [Bot], Mase and 343 guests