Grob wrote:Socrates wrote:Socrates wrote:cdncityfan wrote:Honestly, I believe that our existing squad is good enough to win the Barclays Premier League. Why we are 15 points behind the leaders have more to do with the number of games where the team has not played as a unit as opposed to the quality of the players as individuals. Team organization has improved under Mancini, albeit at the cost of scoring as many goals against anyone except Burnley and Championship sides.
Apart from adding more depth (although after injury returns, our bench is deeper than the rags, liverpool and arsenal and slightly behind Chelsea), keeping the team together to develop better chemistry and tactical fluidity would be the best thing which we can do. Or we can spend another 200 million quid and start the process all over again.
And Chelsea?
and Birmingham...
this 4-2-4 formation is starting to grow on me!
Its always easier to win football matches when you try to attack. I like this new approach Mancini is finally trying of putting 4 attackers on the pitch rather than 3. The 4 attackers we are currently using, unlike our long gone Brazilian contingient, work for they're team both with and without the ball.
Maybe getting rid of the brazilians was the key all along?
No, they'd flourish in this system now that we have the defence sorted out. We now have a manager who can get players to attack and defend in the same formation!