gillie wrote:To world football domination for years to come.71pts gets us CL imo and all the superstar players we craved when the Shiekh first took over our great club.We will achieve it and they will come.Thoughts.
brite blu sky wrote:i'm not convinced that we need that many new superstar players. we need to continue to improve and get slightly more quality in depth. But we have ( and i firmly believe they will come good ) Vlad Wiess, Joe Hart, Boyata, Magic Johnson, Stevie Ireland.
I would think 2 or 3 buys would be enough but not necessarily superstars already.. they can become that at City
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:I don't think people quite understand how far away we are materialwise from best teams in the world. I repeat what I said on another thread. It will take another 200m easy to get us to top of the world.
Regarding first post, i agree that nine points will do it but will demand sweat and tears looking at our fixture list.
Patrick wrote:We are on a great run at the moment but the last nine points were a lot easier than the next nine considering the opposition. It would be the greatest thing that has happened to city in 30 years if we finish 4th. I can't remember feeling this excited since dickov slid about north London on his knees
Vhero wrote:Patrick wrote:We are on a great run at the moment but the last nine points were a lot easier than the next nine considering the opposition. It would be the greatest thing that has happened to city in 30 years if we finish 4th. I can't remember feeling this excited since dickov slid about north London on his knees
Saying that though we had a lot better luck this season against the tougher teams than the lower teams. It's been the lower teams that's troubled us most. We beat arsenal a good few times already this season and the rags at home already. I think we have the best record against the top 4 this season so far don't we? Outside the top 4 teams of course...
patrickblue wrote:Vhero wrote:Patrick wrote:We are on a great run at the moment but the last nine points were a lot easier than the next nine considering the opposition. It would be the greatest thing that has happened to city in 30 years if we finish 4th. I can't remember feeling this excited since dickov slid about north London on his knees
Saying that though we had a lot better luck this season against the tougher teams than the lower teams. It's been the lower teams that's troubled us most. We beat arsenal a good few times already this season and the rags at home already. I think we have the best record against the top 4 this season so far don't we? Outside the top 4 teams of course...
By a mile. In fact I think we probably have the best record including the top 4. Spuds have one of the worst.
Edit; Thought I'd check. We're second to Chelsea who have played 5 and won them all. (but then we've had 6 points off them)
City played 6 - 11 points
Arse played 6 - 6 points
scum played 6 - 9 points
liverpool played 5 -3 points
Chelsea played 5 -15 points
http://www.statbunker.com/football/btb/ ... atType=AG4
giokingkladze wrote:patrickblue wrote:Vhero wrote:Patrick wrote:We are on a great run at the moment but the last nine points were a lot easier than the next nine considering the opposition. It would be the greatest thing that has happened to city in 30 years if we finish 4th. I can't remember feeling this excited since dickov slid about north London on his knees
Saying that though we had a lot better luck this season against the tougher teams than the lower teams. It's been the lower teams that's troubled us most. We beat arsenal a good few times already this season and the rags at home already. I think we have the best record against the top 4 this season so far don't we? Outside the top 4 teams of course...
By a mile. In fact I think we probably have the best record including the top 4. Spuds have one of the worst.
Edit; Thought I'd check. We're second to Chelsea who have played 5 and won them all. (but then we've had 6 points off them)
City played 6 - 11 points
Arse played 6 - 6 points
scum played 6 - 9 points
liverpool played 5 -3 points
Chelsea played 5 -15 points
http://www.statbunker.com/football/btb/ ... atType=AG4
If you add us to those four however, and our double over Chelsea, it puts us on 17 points and them still 15... a telling stat.
I think if we get fourth, we'll spend roughly £100m in the summer on just 3 or 4 players. Same again next summer and we'll be a match for anyone
patrickblue wrote:giokingkladze wrote:
If you add us to those four however, and our double over Chelsea, it puts us on 17 points and them still 15... a telling stat.
I think if we get fourth, we'll spend roughly £100m in the summer on just 3 or 4 players. Same again next summer and we'll be a match for anyone
only if we beat scum and arse would we be on 17, but still a telling stat
Yes, if you imagine us as part of a big 5 it would look like this.
City played 6 - 11 points
Arse played 7 - 6 points
scum played 7 - 12 points
liverpool played 7 - 5 points
Chelsea played 7 -15 points
giokingkladze wrote:patrickblue wrote:giokingkladze wrote:
If you add us to those four however, and our double over Chelsea, it puts us on 17 points and them still 15... a telling stat.
I think if we get fourth, we'll spend roughly £100m in the summer on just 3 or 4 players. Same again next summer and we'll be a match for anyone
only if we beat scum and arse would we be on 17, but still a telling stat
Yes, if you imagine us as part of a big 5 it would look like this.
City played 6 - 11 points
Arse played 7 - 6 points
scum played 7 - 12 points
liverpool played 7 - 5 points
Chelsea played 7 -15 points
Ah right, my mistake, I thought you'd not included each of the 'big 4's' results against us
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, Harry Dowd scored, johnnyondioline, Mase, MIAMCFC, Nigels Tackle, Paul68, salford city and 596 guests