mcfc1632 wrote:Kladze wrote:Hughes is gone.
The king is dead, long live the king.
If most of us can get over Hughes then just maybe Antii can get over his Mancini obsession?
I think that you have it the wrong way around - I think that NQDP has a Hughes obsession he can just not let go
There were a few highly vocal Hughes haters that went on and on - after they got what they wanted it is them that have not been able to let it go - this is just another thread (after several others) that seem to be aimed more about those same people reaffirming that they were right
Meanwhile the rest of us are just getting on with supporting CITY (as we were before)
Grob wrote:Hughes was given the boot with the club in 6th after failing to get into the top 4.
Currently we are 6th.
If Mancini finishes 6th he will have failed to hit his target and like his predecessor, and should be given the boot accodingly in a show of consistancy.
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Grob wrote:Hughes was given the boot with the club in 6th after failing to get into the top 4.
Currently we are 6th.
If Mancini finishes 6th he will have failed to hit his target and like his predecessor, and should be given the boot accodingly in a show of consistancy.
on paper, yeah brilliant, but who the fuck else is there? i'd have kept Hughes, as I'd have kept Sven, and I preferred them both to Mancini (stylistically) but surely there is no mileage at all in replacing him this quickly... let's have a bit of continuity - it remains the onlyy thing we have not tried.
Grob wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Grob wrote:Hughes was given the boot with the club in 6th after failing to get into the top 4.
Currently we are 6th.
If Mancini finishes 6th he will have failed to hit his target and like his predecessor, and should be given the boot accodingly in a show of consistancy.
on paper, yeah brilliant, but who the fuck else is there? i'd have kept Hughes, as I'd have kept Sven, and I preferred them both to Mancini (stylistically) but surely there is no mileage at all in replacing him this quickly... let's have a bit of continuity - it remains the onlyy thing we have not tried.
Getting the club into the top 4 with a squad full of good players and an open cheque book shouldnt be too hard, im sure theres scores of managers who could do that job. Its worthless listing names here just so others can write them off as 'shit'.
Again, if Hughes was sacked for not hitting his target, I expect the club to be consistant and fire Mancini if he misses his.
I hope he doesnt by the way to dispell any myths that I am a Mancini hater, but I think he will.
DoomMerchant wrote:Grob wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Grob wrote:Hughes was given the boot with the club in 6th after failing to get into the top 4.
Currently we are 6th.
If Mancini finishes 6th he will have failed to hit his target and like his predecessor, and should be given the boot accodingly in a show of consistancy.
on paper, yeah brilliant, but who the fuck else is there? i'd have kept Hughes, as I'd have kept Sven, and I preferred them both to Mancini (stylistically) but surely there is no mileage at all in replacing him this quickly... let's have a bit of continuity - it remains the onlyy thing we have not tried.
Getting the club into the top 4 with a squad full of good players and an open cheque book shouldnt be too hard, im sure theres scores of managers who could do that job. Its worthless listing names here just so others can write them off as 'shit'.
Again, if Hughes was sacked for not hitting his target, I expect the club to be consistant and fire Mancini if he misses his.
I hope he doesnt by the way to dispell any myths that I am a Mancini hater, but I think he will.
so you don't think it's healthy to suggest that this squad helmed by MON, Moyes, Arry, or Hodgson would make it into the Top 4? or that one of Neil Warnock, Fat Sam, Paul Jewell, or Stuart Pearce might be able to get Top 6 easily or even Top 4 as well?
cheers
Kladze wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Kladze wrote:Hughes is gone.
The king is dead, long live the king.
If most of us can get over Hughes then just maybe Antii can get over his Mancini obsession?
I think that you have it the wrong way around - I think that NQDP has a Hughes obsession he can just not let go
There were a few highly vocal Hughes haters that went on and on - after they got what they wanted it is them that have not been able to let it go - this is just another thread (after several others) that seem to be aimed more about those same people reaffirming that they were right
Meanwhile the rest of us are just getting on with supporting CITY (as we were before)
Couldn't agree more.
But we (the rest of us) need to stop responding to 'that group' of posters, who clearly have an agenda which we can either ignore or feed.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Grob wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Grob wrote:Hughes was given the boot with the club in 6th after failing to get into the top 4.
Currently we are 6th.
If Mancini finishes 6th he will have failed to hit his target and like his predecessor, and should be given the boot accodingly in a show of consistancy.
on paper, yeah brilliant, but who the fuck else is there? i'd have kept Hughes, as I'd have kept Sven, and I preferred them both to Mancini (stylistically) but surely there is no mileage at all in replacing him this quickly... let's have a bit of continuity - it remains the onlyy thing we have not tried.
Getting the club into the top 4 with a squad full of good players and an open cheque book shouldnt be too hard, im sure theres scores of managers who could do that job. Its worthless listing names here just so others can write them off as 'shit'.
Again, if Hughes was sacked for not hitting his target, I expect the club to be consistant and fire Mancini if he misses his.
I hope he doesnt by the way to dispell any myths that I am a Mancini hater, but I think he will.
so you don't think it's healthy to suggest that this squad helmed by MON, Moyes, Arry, or Hodgson would make it into the Top 4? or that one of Neil Warnock, Fat Sam, Paul Jewell, or Stuart Pearce might be able to get Top 6 easily or even Top 4 as well?
cheers
no, it's not healthy to suggest that.
john68 wrote:Considering we are just about to enter the most exciting last few days of a season that could see us qualify for the CL for the 1st time since 1968. I would have thought that all our energies would have been concentrated into focussing on that.
I haven't the time and certainly not the inclination to consider failure at this point...Maybe in a weeks time...but certainly not now.
We are about to go into the final battle and people are thinking about sacking our manager...I give up!!!!
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Kladze wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Kladze wrote:Hughes is gone.
The king is dead, long live the king.
If most of us can get over Hughes then just maybe Antii can get over his Mancini obsession?
I think that you have it the wrong way around - I think that NQDP has a Hughes obsession he can just not let go
There were a few highly vocal Hughes haters that went on and on - after they got what they wanted it is them that have not been able to let it go - this is just another thread (after several others) that seem to be aimed more about those same people reaffirming that they were right
Meanwhile the rest of us are just getting on with supporting CITY (as we were before)
Couldn't agree more.
But we (the rest of us) need to stop responding to 'that group' of posters, who clearly have an agenda which we can either ignore or feed.
shows the priorities of you two as you only harp on about Hughes and me.
Some City supporters. Maybe one day I see football related topic started by either of you. In fact football related post would be a good start.
mcfc1632 wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Kladze wrote:mcfc1632 wrote:Kladze wrote:Hughes is gone.
The king is dead, long live the king.
If most of us can get over Hughes then just maybe Antii can get over his Mancini obsession?
I think that you have it the wrong way around - I think that NQDP has a Hughes obsession he can just not let go
There were a few highly vocal Hughes haters that went on and on - after they got what they wanted it is them that have not been able to let it go - this is just another thread (after several others) that seem to be aimed more about those same people reaffirming that they were right
Meanwhile the rest of us are just getting on with supporting CITY (as we were before)
Couldn't agree more.
But we (the rest of us) need to stop responding to 'that group' of posters, who clearly have an agenda which we can either ignore or feed.
shows the priorities of you two as you only harp on about Hughes and me.
Some City supporters. Maybe one day I see football related topic started by either of you. In fact football related post would be a good start.
Some CITY supporter? - organised my flight on holiday to leave after the game against Arsenal - flying back from holiday for the Villa and Spurs games - still negotiating with the wife getting back for the Hammers games where I will be forking out for hospitality - lifelong fan - long long time season ticket holder up and down from Berkshire all the time - yeah I am a real poor supporter compared to you
Throw any of the bollocks that you specialize in - but do not question my credentials as a CITY fan - you are conference league compared to me
And anyway can you not just go away - you have said you will ignore me - please just do it
Original Dub wrote:
Questioning other people's support is about the worst thing that can be levelled at anyone on this site I reckon and I've had it done to me quite a few times over the last few months.
We should all refrain from that bollox IMO.
ant london wrote:Original Dub wrote:
Questioning other people's support is about the worst thing that can be levelled at anyone on this site I reckon and I've had it done to me quite a few times over the last few months.
We should all refrain from that bollox IMO.
Very true....I could easily level the accusation against Antti that he cannot possibly hate U***d as much as a blue who grew up in Manchester and has had a lifetime of them and their fans (some of whom are his closest childhood friends and maybe family) rubbing their noses in it every time they have succeeded and we have failed. That all his hatred of them smacks of someone trying too hard to prove how massive a blue he is....and that he cannot possibly "get it" the way a Manc can.
I don't actually think that and I respect all City fans for supporting the club in their own way but that would be an easy cheap shot and I'm pretty sure there are those who would nod along in some way.
Pot shots at fellow fans for not being "proper blues" is a cunt's trick
Leave it out
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: belleebee, gilford, Mase, MIAMCFC, mr_nool, nottsblue, ruralblue and 558 guests