The BEST FORUM in all the land and all the world
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=32218
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:32 pmPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:46 pmgillie wrote:It's only a game if we win on wednesday we still have to win on sunday so take it one game at a time please.If we succeed we are in the CL if not we are in the Europa.Chill brother blues what will be will be.In the words of the song "THE WINNER TAKES IT ALL".
ARE WE WINNERS?.
Agreed mate. I was more nervous before the 1st game of the season at Blackburn. I had a horible feeling that after a summer of hype we would lose, get of to a bad start and the media would be all over us creating stacks of pressure.
I know believe we have proved a point that we can be serious contenders in the future.
If we get into the Champs League this year, absolutely brilliant. If not, so be it, we will do soon .... it's inevitable.
Whatever ..... this is much better than a relegation fight!
YOU BET YOUR ARSE WE ARE.COME ON CITY.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:38 amgillie wrote:It's only a game if we win on wednesday we still have to win on sunday so take it one game at a time please.If we succeed we are in the CL if not we are in the Europa.Chill brother blues what will be will be.In the words of the song "THE WINNER TAKES IT ALL".
ARE WE WINNERS?.
YOU BET YOUR ARSE WE ARE.COME ON CITY.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:12 pmPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:19 pmSlim wrote:Technically gillie, if we win this one by a significant margin, maybe 2 or 3 goals, then a draw against West Ham would be good enough.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:25 pmOriginal Dub wrote:
It'd probably be even more nail biting that way though, because Spurs are more than capable of winning by four goals or more at burnley...
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:32 pmOriginal Dub wrote:Slim wrote:Technically gillie, if we win this one by a significant margin, maybe 2 or 3 goals, then a draw against West Ham would be good enough.
That's also true.
It'd probably be even more nail biting that way though, because Spurs are more than capable of winning by four goals or more at burnley...
All these permitations have been doing my fucking head in over the last while. Bring on Wednesday NOW FFS!
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:39 pmSlim wrote:Technically gillie, if we win this one by a significant margin, maybe 2 or 3 goals, then a draw against West Ham would be good enough.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:40 pmBeefymcfc wrote:Slim wrote:Technically gillie, if we win this one by a significant margin, maybe 2 or 3 goals, then a draw against West Ham would be good enough.
And how good will that point at Arsenal feel? We currently have a +2 GD on Spurs and as we need to win it will be a minimum of +3, which means Spuds would have to score 4 at Burnley without conceding. Not much of an ask really, but not that easy if you ask me as only us and Liverpool have scored more than 3 at Turf Moor.
I know it's jumping the gun and the only game that matters is the one on Wednesday, but I wonder if Mancio planned it like this.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:53 pmSlim wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Slim wrote:Technically gillie, if we win this one by a significant margin, maybe 2 or 3 goals, then a draw against West Ham would be good enough.
And how good will that point at Arsenal feel? We currently have a +2 GD on Spurs and as we need to win it will be a minimum of +3, which means Spuds would have to score 4 at Burnley without conceding. Not much of an ask really, but not that easy if you ask me as only us and Liverpool have scored more than 3 at Turf Moor.
I know it's jumping the gun and the only game that matters is the one on Wednesday, but I wonder if Mancio planned it like this.
Oh you poor math-retarded fool.
If we are +2 and we beat THAT team, our GD goes up one...what does theirs do?